Shugo-Chan
Smash Lord
lol snake vs co. midwest has tons of ics i hate it thats why i use mk for em. falco vs ics is doable but rly hard even played perectly
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
That makes sense because Lain developed the ICs metagame there early (just like NJ has a ton of MKs and FL has tons of Snake players).lol snake vs co. midwest has tons of ics i hate it thats why i use mk for em. falco vs ics is doable but rly hard even played perectly
It's a good and a bad thing. There aren't Many falcos, so no one knows how to against him. But there are alot of char that reck falco in the MW. I honestly don't know how uve done it shugo. Maybe Ohio is better. MI is hell, winners finals are ********, cause ur playing the best icee or debatebly the best pika. And there's judge the falco slayer too.Haha what you say redhalberd is very true. midwest is full of wario and ics.
Yes, he would be the second best char on our tier list-- IF we went strictly off of matchup ratios (many games do this). We don't do our list that way though; we have a bit more "gray area" taken into account, rather than straight matchup numbers-- and that's fine, it's just how we do it. There's not really a right or wrong method.OK, you guys can keep on thinking like that ROFL
Just think about it: If Marth had the second best match-up's HE WOULD BE THE SECOND BEST CHARACTER. MK doesn't hold only him back.
True datMarth doesn't have the 2nd best match-up you biased *****
and ROFL @ GWs position
Not many people have actually studied this game, me included for the moment. Just because it's been given forever or "agreed" upon doesn't necessarily mean it's true. People accept other opinions too quickly w/out actually finding the information out for themself.Marth definitely has the best or second best overall matchup data. That's been a given since like, forever.
The match-up chart doesn't mean anything. It's practically out-dated and a lot of it is based on opinions w/out much factual evidence. That, and Brawl is still new, so some players don't have enough experience to base their opinions on. This can be said for a lot of character match-up charts.Yes.. Have u ever checked the match up chart?
It's just marth is a harder char to be consistent with.
Screw you man. Luigis and Peachs get at me.Diddy has better matchups than Marth.
Do something.
Read my post correctly please. I said you post LIKE you don't know anything. I dont know if you actually do or not.Mav, I've been to LOTS of tournaments. But I'm not from the US so that auto-exculdes me from being knowledgable about Brawl. You win. GGs
AND LOL what does being from the US have to do with anything?
ally doesnt get first here either. San does.Lol.
Someone didn't read Ally's blog or check how Ally just didn't get first in our low tiers event D:
The thread has gone to the public Denzi, it's beyond repair now. Besides, the thread has served it's purpose since they are on week 6 now.And third, QUIT ARGUING ABOUT NOTHING IMPORTANT
I hate to just see things fall off like that though.The thread has gone to the public Denzi, it's beyond repair now. Besides, the thread has served it's purpose since they are on week 6 now.
Marth/MK/ICs.Falco's only BAD matchup is Pikachu.
Agree/disagree?
Marth is probably 55:45 Marth, 60:40 at worst. MK is even in the current ruleset imo, with mk having an advantage on some cps. Icys yes.Marth/MK/ICs.