Once the Meta finds out that Zelda's recovery has such a ridiculously long startup time you won't be living for long, its so simple to just chase her off the stage and keep her off with meta.
double post without thinking... JK JigglyZelda saved me!
MK is a better gimper against Zelda than G&W, but G&W can gimp sometimes too. But the matchup isn't all about gimping. it's about the fact taht Zelda has a nearly impossible time hitting G&W (that means wracking damage AND killing) and merely a tough time hitting meta. And game and watch DOES juggle her better on the stage and CAN kill her better.
As for snake, he's easier to hit than either, but he's harder to kill. He's easier to gimp maybe, but he's harder to kill outright. He can camp the hell out of us and, not lettingbus get our feet below us is really rough. He can't gimp us like the other two, or brutalize us in the air, but his aerials hit hard enough to maim and he can still abuse our recovery even if he can't gimp it. But all that is unimportant considering how ridiculously early he kills us outright. I find it funny, yet sad, that zelda's recover is bad enough that he can actually nail us with his FSMASH as punishment.
All these things considered inevitibly lead to one conclusion: all 3 are bad matchups. Clearly hard counters. Beyond that, however, it seems largely subjective and unsure as far as which is the worst.
My personal experience of the matchups say that Metaknights are the easiest (not easy... but easier than the others) and that game and watches are the toughest.
Also, they are not worse than 80:20 or better than 70:30
general consensus is that, indeed, G&W is the worst matchup, but it looks like a lot of you have more trouble with MK than Snake.
I disagree.... but.... whatever. given how bad all the matchups are. The fact that they are hard counters is sufficient to know.