Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
If I only can defend myself by knocking the attacker away or down, then I would punch them, regardless of gender or age.However, self-defense does not necessarily mean punching someone.
"Oh, that nice woman is stabbing my chest, how could I react in not causing her any harm? :D"Also, the point isn't the kind of damage the woman can do, it's the damage that you can do.
It really depends on the circumstances. I repeat, if I get choked or attacked with a weapon, then yes, a punch would be justified if that was a way of getting them away. However, if it was just a slap cause you were a jerk, then that's a whole different situation.The general sentiment here seems to be, "Well, she hit me first, so I was justified in my actions." Really? Another poster used the example of responding to a physical attack by hitting someone with your car. Is that a justified response? There is nothing short of a life-and-death struggle that justifies a man punching a woman.
I'm 24. I live in New Orleans. I deal with crazy women, not high school girls. Physically speaking, I'm not someone that is going to be running from a fight. My build is that of power, not of speed. Women are not saints, there are just as many *****y females as douchy men out there.@Ran Iji
giving someone what they deserve.
As for giving someone what they deserve, I would beat someone up.
Lets say I have a friend that has a baby with a women and then leaves her. I would probably beat him up.
Or if a guy would hit my GF. He would deserve the same treatment.
Or if someone ***** a women, I would beat them up. Or even worse, if they ***** a child. Then I would seriously beat them up.
The only problem with giving someone what they deserve is that it is to close to revenge and you need to decide if you are being a douche yourself.
IDK, I haven't had a reason to beat someone up for many many many years (since I was 11).
I hope that I don't break my streak.
Oh God make it stop...
Okay, let's substitute the word "woman" with two different words: "child"; "elderly person". Is it okay for you to LOSE CONTROL if any of these people were to hit you?
Should I be the only one at fault if I'm assaulted?
See, this is why people crack me up with this subject. They're so busy judging the male for his actions instead of the other party. Stop with the special treatment. A child, who by the way can still be stronger than an adult male since you like ****ty logic, is no more better than me for hitting. Same goes for the elderly. Same goes for women.
And just to show you how terrible this logic was, let's say I'm that child's father. Child puts his hands on me and threatens me. Are you seriously going to judge me knocking him or her to the ground without judging the fact that a child just attacked his father?
Let's say one of the elderly people I know snaps for whatever reason and is macing me the **** down. Judging my reactions over that person's actions is stupid, especially if the only reason you're judging just me is because that other person is elderly. What if a man my size and my age did it? I bet you wouldn't have any qualms with me striking back then, now would you? If you actually did have a problem with it, I'm 100% sure you wouldn't view it equally to a child attacking me because, well, you pretty much said it yourself. Terrible, terrible logic.
I don't even have to relate this to women because they're a less extreme example, at least in your mind.
What do all of these groups have in common? They are all weaker than the average male. You don't need to be a rocket scientist to know that the average woman, child, or elderly person is weaker than the average male. That gives you power over them, and with that power comes a level of responsibility (thanks Spiderman!). Yes, you do have to exercise control and restraint, because as a man, you can do serious damage to anyone who is weaker than you. And that's everyone who is not an average man.
You are an absolute fool if you base this off of physical strength. Anyone who puts their hands on someone else has to face the potential consequences. Period. If you EVER judge a situation with the crux of it all based on who was physically stronger, you have terrible judgment and are in no position to reprimand the "stronger" person. A person weaker than me can do serious damage to me with weapons, or by hitting me in a spot where my big manly toughness doesn't mean ****.
Seriously though, I'm truly surprised and disturbed at how many people think it's okay to strike a woman, regardless of the circumstances.
I'm shocked that people play the chivalry role still with flawed logic spewing out of their mouths without them realizing it. I'm also shocked that people magically forget that the women/child/elderly person is still an aggressor and is just as much at fault as the man and deserves equal, or WORSE, consequences.
And let me be clear: when anyone posts that they would hit a woman, I read that as, "I will close my fist and punch a woman." If that's not what you meant, then I apologize for lumping you in with the rest of the dirtbags in this thread that think striking a woman is okay.
Doesn't make your logic any ****tier. I don't care what you think of me because you've shown that, at least on this subject, you have double-standards out the *** and most of it could be cleared away with a bit more critical thinking rather than focusing on physical aspects of people.