NAKAT
Smash Champion
Don't ban Brinstar I've beaten MK's there with Fox.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I exaggerated a little. But lets look at the characters who do pretty well against Mk in general. The first 2 that pop up immediately are Diddy, and Falco. Both of these character have a very similar method for fighting MK. You run away and throw crap the entire match. Falco lasers and phantasms around and very rarely DIRECTLY attacks MK but rather looks for openeing when hes not on even ground with MK (figuratively). Diddy works the same way. He pressures MK with peanuts, and chucks bananas at him safely until one of them can connect then attacks MK once MK is no longer in a neutral position.Avoiding a matchup is impossible. Not sure what you're talking about. If you mean avoiding him when landing then I agree with you, there's not really anywhere safe that you can land on this stage. But if you mean avoiding him entirely then I'm not sure what logic you're following. :/
Because placement on the tier list is, of course, everything you need to know about a character's strengths and weaknesses.Lets see. the Tier list goes MK, Snake, Diddy. If I main Diddy, then the only aerial character I could choose from without downgrading would be MK. This would be true for every character on the top of the tier list up until ICs.
In terms of gameplay? Sure. But in terms of crafting a ruleset, I cannot agree. Have you seen the kind of things that they have been brining out? TKD especially. They see things that I don't, but have not been able to explain to me what they see even remotely. I'm not a closed-minded person. But all that TKD has been willing to bring to me is "The Mexicans want it this way". That's not good reasoning for a ruleset.BPC I probably read it but it was inconsequential with my belief( I honestly can't even remember it(but I know I read it). I don't think your paradigm allows you to understand people like adhd, m2k, tkds arguments based on what stages they allow for tournament play(which is the only debate I will discuss here, not anything like a lgl or air time rule). I believe you can only currently understand the game in terms of logic, which is great on paper but loses its practicallity at a tournament when so many factors both seen, and unseen are at play, that the far more experienced players SUCH AS tkd DEHF ADHD can grasp that you or may not.
But it's like calling that kid from "Radio" a ******. You're going on the dictionary definition of the word.But I really suggest you stop labeling people as scrubs, when you really aren't in a place to be the arbiter of the metagame. Disagreement is fine, flaming quite honestly isn't.
This is kind of a false dichotomy, just FYI (and the last statement is simply not applicable to brawl). Character diversity is great, so is stage diversity. But you don't automatically have to sacrifice one for the other. With more stage bans, Metaknight is forced down to the "next tier" of counterpicks for him-Delfino and Frigate. In many matchups, this is simply not that amazing. Character variability is maintained. You can have a fairly ridiculous number of legal stages this way, without character viability suffering. So if you throw in more stage bans, you can keep stages like RC and Brinstar legal, but the "broken" factors like MK on Brinstar are not an issue.@ everyone as a whole
whether you decide to ban brinstar, or not, really depends on what your competitive values are.
Do you favor a greater stage diversity? by allowing brinstar? Which (as far as I know)
isn't random and does not break any ethics soley based by logical backing.
Or do you favor a greater character diversity (like an fd or static based metagame), as more characters will generally prefer FD over brinstar, which more along the lines of (to quote pierce) "a set of skills that directly corrolate to defeating your opponent"
HEY NAPPY!clearly u have not played good warios.
What, you mean like:and honestly i think BF, SV and FD, and yoshis should be legal.
all the other gimmicky stages are dumb and dont really support competition.
the points into having other stages legal are just silly lol
Come on tho you can't tell me that there isn't a stricter correlation between MK and MU's where the other can avoid him than most.", socal sucks." :'( Am sad.
@Judo: But that's true for all of Falco's matchups. Fish for chaingrabs, laser camp, punish landings, kill with bair/usmash high%. That's generally how it goes am I right? And, well, the idea in ALL matchups is to look for an opening and punish once they are at a disadvantaged position. Its just that MK's options reduce the amount of actually disadvantageous positions he can be in in the first place.
I agree.no they wouldn't. wario is hitable
You don't even argue, though.well, have fun guys I'm done arguing here.
you rarely argue either, you just spout correct (in my opinion) informationYou don't even argue, though.
Your arguments are 5-word sentences that a 5-year-old can write better.
what the ****? that ONE post was from like page 2. I then had a 4 page war between just myself and jebus. I posted more than just 5 word arguments. did you even take the time to read this thread?you rarely argue either, you just spout correct (in my opinion) information
That's your problem, not the stages.Only problem I've ever had with Brinstar
Is the acid and how crappy the stage layout is but eh if it's in the game and it's been in so many tournies why complain?
If you can't handle it learn how.
I wasn't talking to you or about you. Simply that ADHD is known to be bull headed in his beliefs, and despite that I generally agree with him.what the ****? that ONE post was from like page 2. I then had a 4 page war between just myself and jebus. I posted more than just 5 word arguments. did you even take the time to read this thread?
don't be a douchebag and spout wrong information
I have every right to rip on the staff. this is the third time I've reported ADHD to the staff for DIRECTLY insulting me in this forum ( not thread). not to mention that he insults others all the time ( and I'm not saying others don't do it) and posts absolutely nothing of worth. this is bull **** and I'm ****ing sick of mods not banning him for this. I absolutely detest the mods way of dealing with people like him. they just give him warnings or a slap on the wrist saying "don't do that again" but guess what, he does. and even if he DOES get an infraction, he waits a week or however long it is until points expire and then comes right back to it.Also Ripple way to rip on the staff, I pay clsoe attention to this thread and this forum. If I miss it reporting it can help make sure it is dealt with and an Smod can take care of it.
this is too selective and you will failWins By MKs:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M-19NssjjZQ&feature=related against Ally (Snake)
Wins by Warios:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ZF4S2kBctE against Ally (MK)
Wins by Captain Falcons:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xo6Qj0b7ReM&feature=related against Judge (Wario)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=an3xN3RpaHs against MK (Lain)
Wins By Snakes:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SJZC84cJQJg against Judge (Wario)
Wins By G&Ws:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8R_H3qerLnA against Shaky (Ness)
More to come
How? I am putting every match I can find that involves characters that are known to be overpowering on that stage (including the matches in which they lose)this is too selective and you will fail
this is why.How? I am putting every match I can find that involves characters that are known to be overpowering on that stage (including the matches in which they lose)
How does one define generally less skilled?I think it would be more relevant to post matches in which the person who is generally less skilled than his opponent wins. Showing matches of better players winning on brinstar does not mean much but seeing a significantly lesser skilled player win does.
Skill is a persons ability to consistently achieve victory. You are right that there is no hard and fast measurement of skill however we can still use the obvious cases.How does one define generally less skilled?
There really isn't any relative game by game statistic to determine that. The only game by game statistic we have to determine skill is who wins. And if they won, they displayed more skill during that specific match.
That is not the level's fault. It's the players and their ability to adapt to the necessary requirements to win in that particular scenario. If they are losing because they can't adapt, it shows less skill on their part.
can you prove that? you have nothing but speculation@Ripple, This stage doesn't get played too often because alot of people ban it (unless there was an MLG stage list in which case most people banned Norfair)
I only have what I heard from pros in Socal after they came back from the MLGs. What do you have?can you prove that? you have nothing but speculation
the burden of proof isn't on me. you have to prove its "too good" for less skilled players.I only have what I heard from pros in Socal after they came back from the MLGs. What do you have?
Larry told me that he would ban Norfair. everyone else either mains MK or does good on that stage so they didn't have to worry about that stage. I talked to Tyrant and he was talking about how Larry was at a disadvantage because of the stage list. I talked to DSF about his win against ADHD and he would say that the stage list definitly helped him a lot (From what I remember him saying, he won him on Norfair).the burden of proof isn't on me. you have to prove its "too good" for less skilled players.
and just curious, what "pros" said this?
No, but this guy wants proofShould the competitive viability of a stage be considered in weighing whether another separate stage is competitively viable?
My gut says it shouldn't.
You are really going to compare my posts to Ripple's?...As he stated.
Also, ADHD, seriously? You're really one to talk...
1. Vinnie > Shaky@ Sunshade, The problem with that is that it is sometimes hard to determine which player is at a higher level than the other when both players are at a top level. Here are some where it is obvious who the better player was and yet they still lost:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=92bAXnlQP-o Gnes vs. D4ba
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=92bAXnlQP-o NickRiddle vs. Slikvik
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8R_H3qerLnA Vinnie vs. Shaky (?)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ZF4S2kBctE Ally vs Krystedez
@Ripple, This stage doesn't get played too often because alot of people ban it (unless there was an MLG stage list in which case most people banned Norfair)