• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

Which Pokemon should be in Brawl?

Which Pokemon should make the roster?

  • Lucario

    Votes: 255 26.3%
  • Blaziken

    Votes: 264 27.2%
  • Deoxys

    Votes: 191 19.7%
  • Meowth

    Votes: 163 16.8%
  • Heracross

    Votes: 64 6.6%
  • Dragonite

    Votes: 112 11.5%
  • Poliwhirl

    Votes: 38 3.9%
  • Sandslash

    Votes: 106 10.9%
  • Paras

    Votes: 41 4.2%
  • Swampert

    Votes: 37 3.8%
  • Buoysel

    Votes: 19 2.0%
  • Bulbasaur & evolutions

    Votes: 52 5.4%
  • Munchlax

    Votes: 45 4.6%
  • Lugia

    Votes: 47 4.8%
  • Charizard

    Votes: 116 11.9%
  • Sceptile

    Votes: 63 6.5%
  • Scyther

    Votes: 189 19.5%
  • Sneasel/Weavel

    Votes: 57 5.9%
  • Kadabra

    Votes: 58 6.0%
  • Gengar

    Votes: 111 11.4%
  • Pichu Bros. / Plusle & Minun

    Votes: 108 11.1%
  • Hitmonlee / Hitmonchan

    Votes: 207 21.3%
  • Eevee & evolutions

    Votes: 100 10.3%
  • Grimer

    Votes: 40 4.1%
  • Missingno

    Votes: 95 9.8%
  • Cubone

    Votes: 120 12.4%

  • Total voters
    971
Status
Not open for further replies.

Pyr0

Smash Ace
Joined
Sep 1, 2006
Messages
918
Location
Plucking Pikmin
Snorlax is TOP tier in all 4 gens
(well not sure about the 4rth since there aint no metagame yet)

But yeah, Snorlax is in pretty much in 80% of competitive teams.

and Ive personaly seen a Curselax (Curse attack using Snorlax) defeat a whole team alone.

So yeah im DEAD serius about snorlax pwnin.
 

Khanczar

Smash Ace
Joined
Apr 25, 2006
Messages
505
Location
what
i personally would want mew in brawl... I know hes been a pokeball pokemon for the last two games, but i still want him in. MewTWO is in, why not mew? He IS the most popular legendary, after all...

Snorlax will not be in brawl.
 

Pyr0

Smash Ace
Joined
Sep 1, 2006
Messages
918
Location
Plucking Pikmin
I smell weight Discrimination :p

Anyway Snorlax is really cool and all, but Munchlax is more Smash Fitting
and hes recent poularity makes him a freat candidate.


If you ever seen the anime, Munchlax is a sort of comic relief character.
wich is suiting into Brawl becouse of the more mature looking characters (Snake, Link, Fox)
we need some comical characters too you know :D


Also another one that looks rather cool... and could play the villian role Ala' Mewtwo is the new DARK type legendary Darkai

 

urban_shinobi

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Dec 20, 2006
Messages
425
Location
Here
No, Salamence is not a better choice. A popular Pokemon? Sure. Powerful? Yes. But a good Smash choice? No. He doesn't fit the Smash physical requirements (Can't stand upright, can't hold items, getting grabbed would be akward, etc.).
sorry, that was for a dragon symbol pokemon. for melee i was gonna go wit snorlax, but now that I think about it, Munchlax is the better choice.
 

MewtwoMaster2002

ミュウツーマスター2002
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
6,148
Location
Japan
3DS FC
2922-0496-2962
I don't think Mew is the most popular legendary. Darkrai doesn't seem much like a good villain since all he does is give bad dreams =/. He would fit better as a Pokeball character by making everyone (except person who threw Pokeball) fall asleep while having their damage rise up as long as they sleep.

Mewtwo by far is still the most popular legendary, but that topic is debatable. Out of all the battles I watched that allows Ubers in them, most have Mewtwo in it. He has the best Special Attack (if you don't count Attack Form Deoxys). He should return to Brawl with less lag and a boost in stats.
 

FiErCe_oNi

Smash Lord
Joined
Apr 6, 2006
Messages
1,355
Location
Ballarat, Australia
do you want to see how dragonite is a symbol? heres some ways: the dragon symbol (this is a fact, whenever you see a pokemon representing dragons, it is dragonite. on top of that, dragonite and its pre-evo's were the only dragons in the first game),

Ridey is enough Dragon for brawl. If they need a poke-dragon, Charizard would be my choice.
ridley isnt a powerful pokemon. charizard isnt a dragon.
a powerful pokemon symbol (it was the first pokemon to have the biggest attack in the game),

Gee, I guess Salmance, with a higher HP, attack, speed, and Special attack makes a better poke then.
salamence is a rip off of dragonite. dragonite was the FIRST pokemon to have the highest attack. besides that, dragonite is more important and suitable.
a boss symbol (the D thread proves that),

He's the favored poke of 1 trainer that isn't even the last one you face, that hasn't been seen in 2 generations.
he is an important boss in 2/3's of the gens (D/P isnt global yet) and a boss in alot of other games. it was the last shadow pokemon able to be captured in XD.
a popular to fans symbol (it was on the top 20 list of pokemon poll. every pokemon fan likes dragonite and it is a favourite pokemon to many).

Top 20. So if 20 pokemon get in, you can expect Dragonite. But for some reason, I don't think that's going to happen.
[/QUOTE]if 20 pokemon became characters, dragonite would be one of them. besides, i was just using that to prove the point that it is popular.
FiErCe_oNi... just to make it clear to you:

1) We already have enough 1st generation Pokémon. I honestly doubt or atleast HOPE that they don't replace Mewtwo and Jigglypuff, since both characters are still populair and don't deserve to go. Pichu will likely get replaced, but not by a 1st generation Pokémon, rather by a 3rd or 4th gen one.
why are generations so important that they judge a characters chances? they dont. popularity and importance does.
2) You complain about that Pokémon are getting more and more ugly after every generation... Well first of all, Dragonite aint a beauty either. Neither is Exegutor, or what about Omastar, Tangela or Clefable? I mean, they're monsters... They are supposed to be ugly right? <_<; Now in all seriousness, I don't think the 3rd generation was THAT bad... I mean, we got Rayqauza, Salamence, Groudon and some other good looking ones... Sure there always are Luvdiscs and Beautyflies around, but don't complain about them because Dragonite is ugly as **** to... Especially comparing to the more dragon-like 3rd gen Salamence.
im not complaing on looks. im complaining about design. the older pokemon have much more unique designs. dragonite is a dragon with electricity inducing antennae and expandable wings. exegutor is a tree with lots of coconut heads. omastar is a prehistoric snail/octopuss. tangela is... covered in vines. salamence doesnt have a unique design. its a rip off of dragonite. its auctually labelled as the hoenn equivilent to dragonite.
3) And even IF Dragonite was considered, he'd had to rival Ridley... Since they're pretty alike -not clones mind you but let's keep it at similair. And he'd never win that populairty contest.
it wouldnt have to rival ridley. i posted ways Dragonite is different from ridley a few posts back. dragonite can use unique pokemon moves. ridley cant.
No, what you know and think are two different things that you need to distinguish between. what you know can mainly be related to facts, unless of course your an idiot who belives everything he/she hears. what you think can be anything. fact or fiction. having a wtf pokemon would be great, because a gret wtf character would be dragonite. but sadly, your reasons are misguided. dragonite isnt a symbol: charizard is a dragon, and if it isnt then that is a horrible mistake on the part of the creators. Snorlax, Aeordactyl, and Gyrados learn hyper beam, the move that i think your talking about. i'd rather have snorlax in the game than dragonite, because it's more of a symbol than dragoinite. remeber that although they are making this for fans of the game (SSB not POKEMON) that they also want more consumers to buy that havent played before. in truth, snorlax would be better as a playable character, than just in a pokeball. ( but again, like many of the guesses here everyone has made, highly unlikely). a boss symbol? that's just whack. it's a boss, but that's really not important. everyone overcame the challenge. so what. and although it was ppular to fans, what about the other guy. I'm sure there are alot of fans of SSB who hate pokemon. the business needs to cater to them as well. dont say that you dont want dragointe because it isnt your favorite pokemon. that's the reason why many have come to this post. im mean hell, you made a friggin shrine.(creepy)
what you think is what you know... now stop trying to act smart, because you arent. charizard isnt even a dragon. do you see "dragon" in its typing? sure, it looks like one, but it isnt. *starts trying to translate your next part*... so now you're trying to compare it? bah, just look at its score on the polls.. its beating them... boss's are important. look at bowser, ganondorf. they started off as bosses that you overcame, and now they are important characters. they dont need to cater for the pokemon haters because everyone knows they are idiots and they shouldnt listen to their opinion. Dragonite should be in because it would be a great character for everyone. i made a support shrine then. you got a problem? why dont you start hastling Kaid now because of his lucario thread?
again and again and again i have to repeat it. This game isnt just for the fans of SSB. In order to have the highest amount of sales, and for replay value, they have to make it to custom not only the fans, but anyone who seems slightly interested to come and and play. you cant go and just put in any pokemon, but rather pokemon that are always there, and will be here later in the series. Snorlax is still in the later series, and Blazeken/Combusken are both up and comers. It's either they put in a regualr in the the show/any media , or a pokemon that had a big part in movies. we, the smash fans of america, arent the only ones playing.
blaziken/combusken arent always going to be there because they are starters... starters are limited to 1 generation, then they never appear in other games (unless it requires picking a starter, like mystery dungeon). Dragonite has appeard in every gen except 1, and it probably will keep appearing in future gens. like i said before, does anyone care abotu what poke haters thing? take out mewtwo and jiggly?
What's wrong with you. Everyone has to agree? Heck no. New pokemon arent looking worse and worse. Your vision of pokemon is gtting worse and worse. You want games that have the same old crap over and over again. Better stats and better looking are your views, so dont hypocrisize yourself by making it seem like that is true. all because a pokemon gets newer moves, or that it's stats get raised doesnt make it better than all the rest guess. maybe the stats are raised so that the older ones can keep up. it's like giving viagra to a senior. you take that away, and guess who greatly surpasses who.
they have worse designs. they are less unique. they are increasing the number of rip offs. the new evolutions look pathetic. face it, 1st gen is the best gen. it isnt some sort of old car that cant keep up. why do you think they made a remake of it?
obviously you dont. again, in order to balance the game they have to raise their stats. it's only fair. the were design as more of a stone age like race. newer pokemon are getting much more advanced, and frankly i think some look much better.
i dont think i care about what you think now. 1st gen stone age design? newer gens more avanced design? you like the newer designs better? o yeah, Dainoosu (nosepass evo), Dosaidon (Rhydon evo) and buuburn (magmar evo) have better more (advanced) designs eh?
No, you fail to understand comparisons. They dont have to be the same, or revelant. they just have to be able to prove a point ( which is impossible for you, due to you lack of knowledge). I said that no new pokemon into the game of SSB ( not new to the pokemon franchise). Look at this whole post, actually the first few ones. All new. All have a hhigher possiblity of going in.
oh, im sorry but i cant tell when you are making points, because you mostly make points out of irrevilence like global warming and companys i've never heard of... can you please stop trying to act smart? its annoying. now what does this next part say? bah, im not going to bother...
This arguement is pointless because of what your arguing for. I never said i didnt want dragonite in the game/ nor did i said it wasnt a favorite of mine. I'm stating the possiblity of many of the R/B series pokemon getting into SSB is low. No ones throwing the towl( w/e the hell that is). yes, any 1st gen would be a WTF character. not everyone would know it. What about the others, the children, the people who dont even like pokemon. Everyone wont know it (thing your think). Many people would know it(thing I know). A new pokemon is going to be able to be for everyone. Old pokemon, although cool and what brought us up as kids, are going to be wtf characters if they get in. I was stunned by mewtwo in SSBM, not pichu. again, dont say stuff that cant partain to everyone, not just teens, or fans.
you havnt stated any good reason why the first gen pokemon have lowered chances. everyone that ahs played pokemon knows the first gen. where do you get the idea that people play 3rd gen and then stop playing? the children that dont like pokemon? you mean they 5 year olds that think they're gangstas? newer pokemon are known much less than older pokemon because older pokemon ahve been around longer and were available when it had its beggest fanbase. are you too much of an idiot to understand that? i cant even point out something obvious without you coming up with a nonsense theory...
ok, come on. stop acting dumb. IT HAS THE WORD PET IN IT. obviously it has something to do with domesticated animals (P..E..T..S). run a dang google search.
na i dont think i will... you should provide info, being the guy im arguing with, you should at least tell me what you're talking about. on the other hand, i dont care and this is irrevilent and pointless. now stop trying to act smart by using irrevilence.
yea it is. what type of weed to they have in Austrailia man. HELLO. you cnat just go and expect everything you see on tv, or on your gameboy. grow a reality gland man.
oh no! i have a false sense of reality because i play video games! ever heard about facts of fiction or something like that? idiot...
yea, that is the only factors. Some kids cant vote, and they have to make a decision also on movie sales, game sales, and reviews for games. it doesnt make sense because of the lack of brain capacity, and lack of actual british school teachings in Aussieland.
noone watches the movies (i cant find them at video stores, they arent at the cinemas), the oldest gens remain with the best game sales and have the best reviews. stop trying to hide the fact that you are an idiot that doesnt make sense.
pokemon arent real, thus pokedex isnt real either. so try and make sense of stuff, i know it's a strain for you, but someday you'll be in me grade group and you'll understand.
what? pokemon are real! can you PLEASE stop trying to act smart? you are an idiot. face it. i know pokemon and anything pokemon related isnt real (except products). did i say i did? im talking about the facts in the fiction.
o yea, and salamence is a much better choice. we are lacking in strong characters, but hey guess what, maybe we dont need them to be pokemon, and theere are much better choices. Snorlax is waaayyyyy better in popularity, and i don care what polls say. i want poliwrath thought
the majority of pokemon are small, cute and weak. the only striong pokemon isnt physical. there arent better choices than dragonite. why would snorlax be better? it isnt more unique. besides, it isnt even suitable for a character. it sleeps constantly. if you dont care about what the poll says, i dont care about what you think. if you want poliwrath, good for you. noone cares. it isnt popular/important.

awww... everyone posts when im asleep... oh well...
 

kaid

Smash Master
Joined
Nov 3, 2004
Messages
3,414
Location
Boulder Creek, CA.
Charizard is a Dragon, because it's in the Dragon Breeding Groop.

And while there's pokemon architypes, such as the "Common bird" "Common bugs A and B" and "dragon at the end of the 'dex" Many will agree with me that Salmance LOOKS cooler than Tyranataur, Dragonite, and D/P's Gaburaisu.
 

FiErCe_oNi

Smash Lord
Joined
Apr 6, 2006
Messages
1,355
Location
Ballarat, Australia
Charizard is a Dragon, because it's in the Dragon Breeding Groop.

And while there's pokemon architypes, such as the "Common bird" "Common bugs A and B" and "dragon at the end of the 'dex" Many will agree with me that Salmance LOOKS cooler than Tyranataur, Dragonite, and D/P's Gaburaisu.
charizard still isnt a dragon type...
sure, salamence does look pretty cool but it isnt any more unique, suitable, original, popular and important than Dragonite. its a quadroped rip off of dragonite with no unique traits. it cant use electric attack because it lacks antennae. it hasnt had nearly as much important roles than dragonite. even if it does seem better in the game, Dragonite will own it and a large amount of other pokemon when D/P is released worldwide.
 

kaid

Smash Master
Joined
Nov 3, 2004
Messages
3,414
Location
Boulder Creek, CA.
Charizard is still a dragon, wether it's weak to ice or not.

If a dragonite or Salmanice is using Electric or Ice moves, somethin is serously wrong, because their Special stats are crappy. A high attack means moves like Earthquake and Rock Slide are far more effective than Thunder or Ice beam.
 

FiErCe_oNi

Smash Lord
Joined
Apr 6, 2006
Messages
1,355
Location
Ballarat, Australia
Charizard is still a dragon, wether it's weak to ice or not.

If a dragonite or Salmanice is using Electric or Ice moves, somethin is serously wrong, because their Special stats are crappy. A high attack means moves like Earthquake and Rock Slide are far more effective than Thunder or Ice beam.
charizard is not a dragon type. its type is fire/flying. not dragon/flying or fire/dragon. its a quasi dragon, it can learn dragon moves, it looks like a dragon but it is not a dragon type. the only dragon types are genuine dragons.

Salamence cant even learn any ice/electric special attacks... anyway
100 base special stat is crappy? its not crappy. its very good. the reason people ignore its special stats is because its physical stats outweigh its special stats. its still good to give it just 1 special attack to counter psysical tanks, cause those screw up psysical sweepers. anyway, Dragonite can learn more physical attacks than salamence. auctually, Dragonite knows every physical attack salamence can learn except its biting attacks and a psychic headbutt. can salamence punch and use the ultimate dragon move: outrage? no, it cant. Dragonite is going to be much more useful than Dragonite in 4th gen anyway.
 

kaid

Smash Master
Joined
Nov 3, 2004
Messages
3,414
Location
Boulder Creek, CA.
The punches are unnessisary, and Outrage fixes your next 3 moves, THEN confuses you. You can't even pull dragonite out! You may call it "Ultimate" but I call it suicide... expecially with Draggy's crappy speed.

And saying Charizard isn't a dragon is saying Jinx isn't humanshape.
 

FiErCe_oNi

Smash Lord
Joined
Apr 6, 2006
Messages
1,355
Location
Ballarat, Australia
The punches are unnessisary, and Outrage fixes your next 3 moves, THEN confuses you. You can't even pull dragonite out! You may call it "Ultimate" but I call it suicide... expecially with Draggy's crappy speed.

And saying Charizard isn't a dragon is saying Jinx isn't humanshape.
the punches are neccisary. fire/electric/ice physical attacks that are stronger+accurate/reliable then fang attacks is neccisary. use dragon dance (a move dragonite learns by level) a few times before outrage and you have speedy unstoppable sweeper. 120 damage plus physical stab and additional speed+attack boosts is not suicide. you could use safeguard (another move Dragonite learns by level) beforehand to get rid of the confusion, and stop pesky intoxicaters in the process if you're cautious. of course, a physical tank could stop it, but you dont believe in special attacks anyway.
charizard isnt a dragon type: fact. there isnt a pokemon type called humanshape, so i cant argue with that. charizard looks like a dragon, attacks like a dragon and seems based on a dragon but it still isnt a dragon type.
 

Black/Light

Smash Master
Joined
May 23, 2006
Messages
3,207
Charizard is a dragon, and Blastoise is a turtle. Pikachu is a mouse, and you are wrong.
OMG. . .LMAO!!!
QFT. . .:laugh:

Edit-And to think, I didn't use one full word in that post. . .

Edit 2- And Blast IS a turtle. It swims and lives in water which the mighty tortoise does not do.
 

FiErCe_oNi

Smash Lord
Joined
Apr 6, 2006
Messages
1,355
Location
Ballarat, Australia
Oh, and in other news, I'm petitioning McFox to restart the poll at the 1000 vote, keeping only the characters that receved over 10% of the vote. (that is, 100 votes)

If everyone else could PM Mcfox, with (1000 vote) somewhere in the title, we could get this restarted.
what exactly should the PM say?
 

Ipslne

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Nov 6, 2006
Messages
363
Location
East Lansing, MI
Can someone tell this Kaid kid to please stop using the internet? Like, call his parents and tell them to disconnect the dial-up?

Seriously, Charizard? Dragon type? Wow. I'm 19... I've known pokemon all the way through the first two sets (R/B/Y-S/G/C) and in the TCG game (Sad, I know... a hobby's a hobby).

So far, I'd have to consider all of you guys nubs. The new set of 100 they've got out is the worst blasphemy towards the series yet. Nintendo has disowned everything I've grown to love (not to mention Wizard as well)... which is why I'm rather glad to have grown out of that phase a few years ago.

I'm just glad a good portion of you seem to have a sense of the old-school... 'cept this Kain kid. You'd get shot if you called Charizard a dragon type on the south side of Lansing.
 

Tsukuyomi

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Dec 16, 2006
Messages
279
im not exactly sure what the point of this argument is... charizard isnt a dragon type. end of story. now what was i saying? yeah... this poll needs to be restarted...
Hey, guess what... Dragonite used to be a worm (looking at Dratini and Dragonair)... They were talking about looks, not Pokemon specifics... So yes, Charizard is a dragon by looks...

And like I explained before, Dragonite is a bad choice for Brawl... I rather have Wobbuffet be a Smash character than Dragonite...
 

FiErCe_oNi

Smash Lord
Joined
Apr 6, 2006
Messages
1,355
Location
Ballarat, Australia
Hey, guess what... Dragonite used to be a worm (looking at Dratini and Dragonair)... They were talking about looks, not Pokemon specifics... So yes, Charizard is a dragon by looks...
im talking about types. i already said i know charizard looks like a dragon. it doesnt matter. Dragonite is a dragon type throughout its whole evolution process. charizard is never a dragon type throughout its evolution process. dratini and dragonair arent worms. they're serpents... serpents are dragons... anyway, wheres your proof that they werent talking about specifics? they said charizard would be a better dragon. charizard isnt even a dragon type though.

And like I explained before, Dragonite is a bad choice for Brawl... I rather have Wobbuffet be a Smash character than Dragonite...
explained? oh yeah, it can fly. nice excuse. too bad that argument is useless, because the game already has flying charcters. how often did you see pit and metaknight fight on land in the trailer? when you play kirby games, arent you flying most of the time? its a unique choice. some people want a boring fighter like hitmonchan. others want characters that wont be boring. if you'd rather have wobbafet as a character than dragonite, good for you. noone cares.

o wait, here it is
As for this Dragonite thing, I think it will not work in my opinion... Size will make him and easy target, but its the wings that makes it not a good character...

Larger the size = big power and harder to recover (referring the DK and Bowser... People found ways to abuse Ganon's Down+B as a recovery)

If Dragonite is entered, its Up+B must be a crappy attack that doesn't take you much anywhere...
so... it wouldnt work because it is big and it has wings? then... its a rule for heavy characters to have bad recovery? OK... the game needs more large characters, dragonite isnt too large. there isnt a problem with wings. there isnt any reason why a heavy character cant have good recovery.
 

kaid

Smash Master
Joined
Nov 3, 2004
Messages
3,414
Location
Boulder Creek, CA.
Can someone tell this Kaid kid to please stop using the internet? Like, call his parents and tell them to disconnect the dial-up?

Seriously, Charizard? Dragon type? Wow. I'm 19... I've known pokemon all the way through the first two sets (R/B/Y-S/G/C) and in the TCG game (Sad, I know... a hobby's a hobby).
Hardly. It's a dragon by Egg Groop, NOT type. You might not know about Egg Groops, it was only introduced in G/S and beyond.
 

FiErCe_oNi

Smash Lord
Joined
Apr 6, 2006
Messages
1,355
Location
Ballarat, Australia
Hardly. It's a dragon by Egg Groop, NOT type. You might not know about Egg Groops, it was only introduced in G/S and beyond.
the dragon egg group isnt accurate at confirming dragons. seviper a dragon? it cant even learn any dragon moves. all it states is what pokemon are able to breed with others. being able to breed with dragons doesnt make something a dragon. im not asian because i can breed with asians, am i?
 

MasterGary

Smash Ace
Joined
Dec 22, 2006
Messages
872
Location
Netherlands Antilles
this past realy grows fast. u people shud stop all this. i think we know that charizard isint a dragon TYPE. but u most b blind if u can look at him and say he isint a dragon.
 

FiErCe_oNi

Smash Lord
Joined
Apr 6, 2006
Messages
1,355
Location
Ballarat, Australia
it looks like a dragon. looks arent everything. do you see anything in its pokedex profile that classifies it as a dragon? it may be a flying fire breathing lizard that seems to be based on dragons, but it still isnt an official dragon. the only thing that can classify it as a sort of dragon is its egg group, which also includes non dragonic pokemon such as seviper and treecko. lets see charizards classification... its a "flame" pokemon. not a "dragon" pokemon. now lets see its type... fire/flying. not dragon/flying. dragon moves it learns by levels... only 1: dragon rage. if you think that makes it a dragon, onix learns dragonbreath by level. the correct term for charizard's dragon relationship is "quasi dragon". it is similar to a dragon. it still is not an official dragon though.
 

Ipslne

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Nov 6, 2006
Messages
363
Location
East Lansing, MI
Egg "Group"?

Yeah listen, I played Silver and Gold... there were no "Egg Groups". They had eggs and private poke-sex... but no egg groups. Maybe in later games? After Crystal?

And do I have to repeat myself? SHOT if you say that.
 

FiErCe_oNi

Smash Lord
Joined
Apr 6, 2006
Messages
1,355
Location
Ballarat, Australia
whats with scyther's votes? dont people realise that its upper limbs are not flexible enough to do anything except wave them around? in other words, did you even think about any ways scyther could use items before you voted? every character that gets in should at least be bipedal, have upper limbs that can hold things, lower limbs that can be used as transport and a head. (in other words, they have to be somewhat humanoid, with the restrictions starting from there)
 

kaid

Smash Master
Joined
Nov 3, 2004
Messages
3,414
Location
Boulder Creek, CA.
Egg "Group"?

Yeah listen, I played Silver and Gold... there were no "Egg Groups". They had eggs and private poke-sex... but no egg groups. Maybe in later games? After Crystal?

And do I have to repeat myself? SHOT if you say that.
You obvoiusly never figured out why some pokemon could breed with each other, and some cant.

Charizard is in the Monster and Dragon Egg groops. that means it can make eggs with other Monsters like Mareep or Kangaskan, and other Dragons, like Milotic, Salmance, and Grovile.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom