July
Smash Apprentice
@T-Block: Ignore my question to you about scum picks, you literally just answered it. Can explain your read on Ran a bit more?
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
My other two suspects outside of DeGrey are PLSD and T-Block. T-Block is a hard read to get because I only played with him once and he was obvtown the entire time, and like he said a couple times our reads lined up a lot in that game (I was indy lover that game@July: Sorry if this is a repetitive question but besides Grey, who are your top scum suspects? Anyone besides a lurker?
His claim reminds me a lot of Kuz's claim in Celebrity mafia:@July: By default your severe push on Grey means you think he is fake claimng??
Okay then
Katie Couric, Town Informed Journalist
The details of my PR are that I received mod confirmed info at the beginning of the game but otherwise am a VT.
I believe it may be a role Tiger made up.
This was a lot of information at the time and everything checked out. Except for the fact that Kuz fabricated the role, and was actually scum and used a mixture of vague information and information gained from scum prs to screw with us.Ahhh figured as much. Why didnt you just say that earlier, things are making sense now I think.
Okay here goes.
I KNOW ABSOLUTELY NOTHING AND WAS PLAYING YOU THE WHOLE TIME
kidding.
I was given two pieces of information at the beginning of the game from the mod.
1. I was told that Tiger Woods is "seducing" players and that he is able to talk with his targets during the night phase (the info I received did not make it seem like it was an indefinite masonry but rather one night shots), but I am not sure.
and
2. Swiss is a male character.
I crumbed knowing this several times by replacing other vocab in my sentences with "seduce" in an attempt to get seduced (I was not). I will find these if you want.
I immediately jumped to conclusions that Swiss was Tiger Woods, as I thought all the other characters are females. However, during last Night's flavor there is a male member of the mafia talking to a female one, so I realized that Swiss was not the only Male character in the game. This is why I am now less sure of his alignment.
Now we get into assumptions
From the crumbs I picked up (from other players), I am GUESSING N1 Swiss targeted July and he targeted Axel N2 as they both seem to feel confident about his alignment.
From what Axel is saying it does in fact look like Swiss is Tiger.
Thats what I know.
Your turn.
1) I've seen him give opinions on KK in his #800, and I feel like after he asked me a significant amount of questions about my reads and stances he provided a read on me as well. I think that he has been more subtle with providing his reads but he's been doing a lot of scumhunting by asking questions to get to those reads.IMPORTANT NOTE TO EVERYONE
Now that Nabe's posted his response (and I've responded in turn to that) I want other people to comment on the case against him. If you disagree with the caseand think Nabe is town, I have two questions for you (well, technically it's three questions).
1): Where does Nabe post scumreads without being requested, with reasoning? (After all, one would expect every townie at some point to go "I think X is scum, and here's why.") The only examples I found on my ISO are his case on myself and perhaps his slight push on SK.
2): Would you agree with the assessment that Nabe's play has been safe? If not, please show what exactly he's done that's been remotely risky. If so, what town motivation is there behind ultra-safe play?
Please don't insinuate that I'm too dumb to see my own play. I am very conscious that it is there. I am also very conscious that you are insane if you think I'm scummy enough to be lynched over others in this game right now. The last line of this quote is exactly the reason you're scum.And if you don't want to explain things then that's fine. If you want to ignore me that's fine. But you can't honestly be ignorant of how scummy your behavior has been so far or how little you have scumhunted and then think that you can just ignore it. I will continue to push you until one of us is dead.
I really can't figure out how this is supposed to be scummy. What purpose does an offhand statement serve for you that my posts haven't?I basically mean a statement. Something related to this game that isn't a question. It's surprisingly uncommon from your playerslot's early game play.
There's no bluff to call. You're accusing me of not posting my reads in their entirety before I was asked for them and for a couple, before I had formed them. You're right in that accusation. It just isn't scummy. As I've said, my reads are out, it's over with.Anyway, I'd like to call your bluff. I want to see the following from you in quotes.
1)Places where you've given scumreads without being asked for them. (In the ISO, I would occasionally find one here or there, but it was quite uncommon.)
2)Places where you've given reasons for your scumreads and tried to get them lynched. (Aside from perhaps a minor push on SK and your case on me, there aren't any instances of this. AT ALL.)
You're a confusing person. How can you say that the motive I suggest is made plain by my posts, and then say you don't see me using the answers to my questions? Your first sentence here is either false, or it's you conceding the point in full.It's not provable either way, and you're quite correct, your motive is made plain by your posts. However, I don't see you actually use the answers to your questions in any way. The obvious counterpoint to this is that you use them in your scumreads, however because you never post any motivation for said scumreads, that is also unprovable, and I think you're bluffing.
Again, I don't see how this is scummy. Many players hold onto reads intentionally. I didn't even do that.Also, about the voicing your reads on every player, yes you have. The trick is that you've been asked for them. I want quotes where you've posted scumreads WITHOUT being asked of them, info you've volunteered of your own free will.
Yes. Which has nothing to do with what you're suggesting. You're suggesting that scumNabe needs to break free of his super-scummy random questions by making a case on a weak link. I'm suggesting that ScumNabe would continue to stick it out in the funk, ask questions, and otherwise lurk.Actually, you said yourself that you post a lot of questions as scum. (The quote in question is referred to in the big case post.)
It's a scumslip. That's not a point, it's a reason in full to think someone is scum.Actually, it was your case on me that led to this. I couldn't understand how the one new point Reyth had raised had changed your mind so dramatically.
It's almost as if I were still forming reads or something.During said ISO, I noticed that although you asked tons of questions, I could never actually figure out who you thought was scum and why.
Okay. Not my intent.Then I noticed that everything you did was quite safe, basically nothing you did could even be argued with, let alone used to build a (normal) case.
Which... isn't scummy. Ask and you shall receive. Everyone else was content after my catch-up to ask questions of me, and got quick, open responses. You went directly to accusing me of holding back my reads.Regarding town vs scum motivation, I think I've displayed the reasoning for the scum motivation. You claim that you used those questions for their answers. Well, since I'm not a mind reader, so I have no clue how those answers benefitted your reads, and you never volunteered that information.
I was entirely cool with letting the game take its course. Town can't have every player trying to play leader in every game, and I had nothing important to argue. Now I do.Additionally, you seemed more or less content (aside from your case on me) to let the game take its course, as you posted little in the way of scumreads (only when asked), and didn't push said scumreads.
That's entirely my point. You looked at what should be circumstantial evidence and only saw scum motivation in it? Bull****.This can't be proven either way. I don't have any evidence that you didn't just read up, see the scumslip, and thus vote. However, you don't have any evidence that it DID happen that way.
You seem to be thinking my reads should flop from a D1 read. Why can't a series of posts from a player strengthen a read that's already there, or sharpen it from a lean to a full read, or sharpen a null to a lean? Are there some reads you think I'm wrong on?Also, aside from your vote on me, you haven't mentioned any major read changes from reading half the game. What's your townie explanation for this? The scum explanation is obvious, you just needed some token case to look active and townie, then you could go back to your safe questions.
No, you simply haven't looked from that perspective, which is inherently obvious in your posting of the case and how you went directly on the offensive after I voted you. As you said, you thought my vote for you was scummy. After that, it's obvious you did a PBP with that assumption in hand.No, I've looked, and scum-Nabe fits the pieces better.
These are both explained above.Why haven't you posted scumreads without anyone asking you?
Why haven't you pushed a single scumread for a lynch aside from me?
It's not impossible at all, since everything with me is already out in the open.Why is it that it's impossible to determine your stance on people without actually asking you?
I had a pretty easy time of it, myself.I couldn't answer these questions with Nabe-town.
Meta is only important until someone knows about it. You said yourself you've tried not to tunnel as town, because you know you do it. The opposite can be true of your scum game, you know your town meta and play to it. Because of your acknowledgement of your town meta, it's effectively useless. Reyth made that black and white.Meta is an important thing to take into account with any read, if you have some. So, let me ask you... how does Reyth offering a no-meta read on me suddenly invalidate your meta on me?
As scum it's just a convenient way to hop my wagon. What's the town view on this, Nabe?
I don't have safe play as a priority. You've shown that my play is safe though, which seems to be a fair evaluation.[/quote]Well, I've proven that everything you've done is safe, and there's a definite scum motive for playing that way. Being safe should not be a townie's priority, yet it certainly seems like one of your priorities...
Plz repost in the hydraPlease don't insinuate that I'm too dumb to see my own play. I am very conscious that it is there. I am also very conscious that you are insane if you think I'm scummy enough to be lynched over others in this game right now. The last line of this quote is exactly the reason you're scum.
I happen to know for a fact that I am scummy. I also know that I am not scummy enough to be lynched. What do you think of that PLSD?
Him talking about voting KK looks to me like he's already given up on talking to Raz, or at least thinks that he can convince Raz it's the right choice. That's why it works for me as an in-between. Null there. I do agree that he should've voted after "giving up" as it were.The first two are where I found the difference in his opinion on votes to be most significant. At first he says that he isn't voting because he hasn't talked to Raziek about it, but the second one he says he will throw his vote on KK if KK gets half way to a lynch. Don't you think that would be something more important to talk to your partner about than putting a vote down on KK at the time of his post? And why still does he not feel the inclination to vote when he "gives up" on talking with his other head?
He's about as tunnelly on Nich as one would expect from Nich himself. That he's not harping on the scumslip like I am suggests to me that he's town though, because as scum seeing me pushing it I think he'd grab onto that more thoroughly. I like his 438, his reasoning all seems fair and even, he doesn't take it as a chance to push a lynch but simply expresses all his reads.Nabe, thoughts on T-Block so far? Also can you give me your opinion on his #438.
@July:
I don't see why you should ask Degrey the same question I asked him. I do agree with you repeating about not answering questions to Tblock, but I can handle the attacks on me. I also agree that Degrey hasn't scumhunted much per say.
Why does he make such a big deal about July asking DG the same question? I believe he was explicitly asked why it mattered, and he never replied.@July:
1. He hasn't responded to me yet, so there was no need to ask him unless he has ignored my question. If he hasn't responded, then if you were still interested then it wouldn't bother me to ask him (and it'd help too). It's not necessary at this point.
He asks this to PLSD when he pops in here, even after PLSD states that he hasn't read the thread. Why is he asking PLSD a broad question that would require having read the whole thread, and why is he asking it about Zen, who has done nothing?Ok. What do you think of Zen?
I confront him about this, and this is his response -_-4. Tblock: So, what do you care of who I ask PL?
And then he gets on my case for jumping in and out of the thread. After I explain why, he still says it's scummy behaviour. This one isn't quite as bad, and the fact that I was annoyed at how pushy he was might have affected my thoughts here. This is not so much a case of not being genuine as it is a case of being overly aggressive.Obviously not.
Also not liking Tblock getting in here and leaving multiple times. Thoughts on that?
Well Tiger Woods was information we knew from the start, Katie Couric was Kuz's role that was completely fabricated. It made sense considering some of the other characters were Sarah Palin and such, but no matter what it provided enough information to work and not get him busted as a fake claim.@July: I kind of beg to differ on the Tiger Woods example (at least slightly) because Tiger Woods is a major golf figure whereas Hermoine to my mind is kind of a remote character don't you think?
Well you suggest that KK or myself should be lynched over you when I know I'm town and KK is a solid town read for me, so I sure as hell trust my reads over your scum picks. And the fact that you "know" that you are not scummy enough to be lynched over others in this game, that you think you can slide by with bs reads and bs scumhunting and still not deserve to be lynched for it, well that's just one of the many reasons you are scum.Please don't insinuate that I'm too dumb to see my own play. I am very conscious that it is there. I am also very conscious that you are insane if you think I'm scummy enough to be lynched over others in this game right now. The last line of this quote is exactly the reason you're scum.
I happen to know for a fact that I am scummy. I also know that I am not scummy enough to be lynched. What do you think of that PLSD?
Reyth, how does this change your read on Jpg?I like Nabe because <3:
1) Sincere early scum hunting of SK
2) Sincere ongoing wagon query on Nich with further scum hunting of SK
3) Excellent query of Nich concerning SK and their hydra
4) Excellent catch on pointing out that both .jpg and Nich fencesat their votes
5) Nice catch on SK scum reaching on T-Block
6) Nice catch on Swiss 3 town references for Nich in one post
7) Nice catch on SK's analysis post missing reads for himself and Zen
Sincere scum hunting all game long.
Expand on this. How does this affect your read on me?There were several instances where I felt his posts (questions, attacks, or aggression) were not genuine, as if he were posting for the sake of posting and seeming active. I know there are are at least three points where I felt that. I've never played with Ran before, but I've heard stories, and I'm sure someone is going to come in and defend him with meta, but I can't ignore it anymore.
I'll bring stuff up when I'm caught up, which might be a while lol
Oh.Reyth said he had a voting block with you and VG.jpg and wanted to add TB to it.
In taking his overall read with those two small things, he still remains strongly town for me.Reyth, how does this change your read on Jpg?
That was not a proper response.I like .jpg because <3:
1) He scum hunted early (even during N0)
2) He chose correctly on T-Block & Nich (even if sheeping and fencesat)
3) He discovered hidden arcane knowledge about Nabe-Nich-SK that revealed a super-slick scum hunting mindset
4) Proper response to the July unvote
5) Proper response to the Swiss entry post
6) Correct read on Grey for more content
7) Correct read on the cases against T-Block
8) Correct Swiss town read
9) Correct Reyth town read
And nothing since then to demonstrate anything to the contrary.