Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Why do people find this out of the ordinary? The page scripting makes it so that ads that appear at the top are relevant to the search information. Nothing new.
Ironic that there is a Twilight banner ad as I'm posting this.
May I suggest that the author is simply letting the reader decide for him/herself what exactly is a "perfect" blue?Also, what exactly did she mean by a "perfect" cloudless blue? That's also another thing I noticed.
A more accurate summary would be "We love each other, but you want to eat me. Also, you sparkle."May I suggest that the author is simply letting the reader decide for him/herself what exactly is a "perfect" blue?
Now, isn't that Twilight series the one that can be summed up with the sentence "I love you, but your friends want to eat me"?
A more brief summary, "Adjectives."A more accurate summary would be "We love each other, but you want to eat me. Also, you sparkle."
A truth worth quoting, my friend.A more brief summary, "Adjectives."
I didn't think it was out of the ordinary. But the fact that it isn't relevant to the search information is what made it ironic, more so because we are all bashing the "novel."Why do people find this out of the ordinary? The page scripting makes it so that ads that appear at the top are relevant to the search information. Nothing new.
That seems to be our problem, the thing that separates the fans from the people who can't stand the fans. It's as if you are inquiring that a book can choose one or the other, a good story, or proper grammar and writing that makes a bit of sense. As if they cannot have both. Neither of which twilight has.As for this whole problem with the writing, many of you are looking awful picky. Maybe it wasn't written the way you would've, but that doesn't mean the writing style is downright awful. I've seen a variety of books where I've questioned the grammar, but the overall plot was just so intriguing I just couldn't help but dig into it. People don't really read books for the grammar anymore, they read for the story. In Twilight, the fans are getting a story that's interesting and through its more human situations, relatable. People grasp that stuff rather than saying "Oh my goodness, how can you say the perfect blue?"
And goodness, nobody cares about "Quality Vampire Books". People are hooked on this story, these characters, and this world. People dress up as wizards for Harry Potter and kids dress up as Hannah Montana because they see her on TV. All of these fads aren't going to end because you're "Sick of it". It's one thing to be a critic and another to not accept reality.
How many people like it has nothing whatsoever to do with whether or not the works deserve such a fanbase. I'd read Stoker's Dracula over Meyer's Twilight any day, for the same reasons you stated in your post; I was "hooked", so to speak (which any good book should do) on the characters, the story, the world. All of those were so much more memorable and artfully portrayed in Dracula than they were in Twilight.It's something that teenagers and Moms have grasped onto and wouldn't mind digging into their pockets to watch or read more. Although it's easy to hate something as popular as Twilight (Just look at the Jonas Brothers, Miley Cyrus, High School Musical), you have to take into account that they have their fanbases and no matter how much you moan, nothing is going to change. So what if the quality isn't picture perfect, something is obviously appealing about them or these singers, bands, and movies wouldn't be sold out nationwide.
And goodness, nobody cares about "Quality Vampire Books". People are hooked on this story, these characters, and this world. People dress up as wizards for Harry Potter and kids dress up as Hannah Montana because they see her on TV. All of these fads aren't going to end because you're "Sick of it". It's one thing to be a critic and another to not accept reality.
You say this like the grammar is the only problem with the book. The story isn't intriguing. I think Twilight goes on for about 300 something pages before even a hint of the plot. How is that good writing at all? It's not. It's just perfect Edward running around with amazing Bella.As for this whole problem with the writing, many of you are looking awful picky. Maybe it wasn't written the way you would've, but that doesn't mean the writing style is downright awful. I've seen a variety of books where I've questioned the grammar, but the overall plot was just so intriguing I just couldn't help but dig into it. People don't really read books for the grammar anymore, they read for the story. In Twilight, the fans are getting a story that's interesting and through its more human situations, relatable. People grasp that stuff rather than saying "Oh my goodness, how can you say the perfect blue?"
I strongly agree with that point. In grade 8-9 my classmates wouldn't even touch a book let alone read it unless for English. Now the only thing they read is that Twilight and Twilight AND Twilight. Then the fact that for the majority of the book is simply "Hot guy is vampire WHEEE. Vampire likes me WHEEE. I want to be a Vampire WEEEE" makes me sad.The biggest thing that I've noticed is that most Twilight fans aren't readers. Twilight and it's sequels, in many cases, are some of the only books they've read, and almost certainly the only books they've read for leisure. The only reason they picked them up was because of the hype already surrounding the series (my sister is a good example of this), which automatically gives them a bias to like the book anyway ("Everyone else likes it, so if I don't, I won't fit in!").
You sir have won my love and gratitude and the whole worldThe "millions of people like it so it MUST be good" line of logic doesn't work. There are key similarities between most Twilight fans that I've seen, which prove that their love of the book is not a good tool to measure the book's worth.
The biggest thing that I've noticed is that most Twilight fans aren't readers. Twilight and it's sequels, in many cases, are some of the only books they've read, and almost certainly the only books they've read for leisure. The only reason they picked them up was because of the hype already surrounding the series (my sister is a good example of this), which automatically gives them a bias to like the book anyway ("Everyone else likes it, so if I don't, I won't fit in!").
If you don't have any knowledge of the kind of quality that's out there, then you're more inclined to think favorably of works of lower quality.
Also, there's a reason the overwhelming majority of Twilight fans are female and under the age of 17. It's easy for tween/teenage girls to ignore the lack of plot and shoddy writing (not just grammar, but poor pacing and storytelling) in favor of simply losing themselves in Bella.
Bella's meant to be this quirky outsider, which many teenage girls see themselves as. And yet, Bella becomes insanely popular with everyone at school for no foreseeable reasons. The hottest guy at school falls in love with her in just a few weeks or months. She's immediately welcomed by almost everyone in his family, despite throwing all of their lives in jeopardy. Outside of being clumsy , she can literally do no wrong, because everyone likes her no matter what she does.
Hell, even the small amount of conflict in the story comes from how inexplicably desirable Bella is. The tracker guy hunts Bella because she just seems that **** delicious.
The entire story is about a socially awkward girl who doesn't have to do anything to earn attention, love and friendship. Amazing things just fall in her lap. It's no wonder young girls can throw aside standards just to walk in Bella's shoes for a while.
The "millions of people like it so it MUST be good" line of logic doesn't work. There are key similarities between most Twilight fans that I've seen, which prove that their love of the book is not a good tool to measure the book's worth.
The biggest thing that I've noticed is that most Twilight fans aren't readers. Twilight and it's sequels, in many cases, are some of the only books they've read, and almost certainly the only books they've read for leisure. The only reason they picked them up was because of the hype already surrounding the series (my sister is a good example of this), which automatically gives them a bias to like the book anyway ("Everyone else likes it, so if I don't, I won't fit in!").
If you don't have any knowledge of the kind of quality that's out there, then you're more inclined to think favorably of works of lower quality.
Also, there's a reason the overwhelming majority of Twilight fans are female and under the age of 17. It's easy for tween/teenage girls to ignore the lack of plot and shoddy writing (not just grammar, but poor pacing and storytelling) in favor of simply losing themselves in Bella.
Bella's meant to be this quirky outsider, which many teenage girls see themselves as. And yet, Bella becomes insanely popular with everyone at school for no foreseeable reasons. The hottest guy at school falls in love with her in just a few weeks or months. She's immediately welcomed by almost everyone in his family, despite throwing all of their lives in jeopardy. Outside of being clumsy , she can literally do no wrong, because everyone likes her no matter what she does.
Hell, even the small amount of conflict in the story comes from how inexplicably desirable Bella is. The tracker guy hunts Bella because she just seems that **** delicious.
The entire story is about a socially awkward girl who doesn't have to do anything to earn attention, love and friendship. Amazing things just fall in her lap. It's no wonder young girls can throw aside standards just to walk in Bella's shoes for a while.
ill agree with the others by saying, GREAT postThe "millions of people like it so it MUST be good" line of logic doesn't work. There are key similarities between most Twilight fans that I've seen, which prove that their love of the book is not a good tool to measure the book's worth.
The biggest thing that I've noticed is that most Twilight fans aren't readers. Twilight and it's sequels, in many cases, are some of the only books they've read, and almost certainly the only books they've read for leisure. The only reason they picked them up was because of the hype already surrounding the series (my sister is a good example of this), which automatically gives them a bias to like the book anyway ("Everyone else likes it, so if I don't, I won't fit in!").
If you don't have any knowledge of the kind of quality that's out there, then you're more inclined to think favorably of works of lower quality.
Also, there's a reason the overwhelming majority of Twilight fans are female and under the age of 17. It's easy for tween/teenage girls to ignore the lack of plot and shoddy writing (not just grammar, but poor pacing and storytelling) in favor of simply losing themselves in Bella.
Bella's meant to be this quirky outsider, which many teenage girls see themselves as. And yet, Bella becomes insanely popular with everyone at school for no foreseeable reasons. The hottest guy at school falls in love with her in just a few weeks or months. She's immediately welcomed by almost everyone in his family, despite throwing all of their lives in jeopardy. Outside of being clumsy , she can literally do no wrong, because everyone likes her no matter what she does.
Hell, even the small amount of conflict in the story comes from how inexplicably desirable Bella is. The tracker guy hunts Bella because she just seems that **** delicious.
The entire story is about a socially awkward girl who doesn't have to do anything to earn attention, love and friendship. Amazing things just fall in her lap. It's no wonder young girls can throw aside standards just to walk in Bella's shoes for a while.
I can't even begin to describe to you this girl at my school who has an undying obsession with this book. So I won't, but I'm almost 99.99% positive she has some form of mental problem because she thinks she is an Asian cat. Yiff in hell fur***s.
Well, that explains the Lucario fanboyism.I am offended by that post, so why don't you keep your opinions to yourself, kay'?
(And look, I didn't yell "FURSECTION", like most stereotypical furries)
I like Lucario Because of his design, and that doesn't mean I'm gay for him. I just think his design is good and appealing, is there a problem with that?Well, that explains the Lucario fanboyism.
Internet. Serious Business. At least I had the dignity to keep it at what I said, huh? It could have been worse.I am offended by that post, so why don't you keep your opinions to yourself, kay'?
(And look, I didn't yell "FURSECTION", like most stereotypical furries)
Internet. Serious Business. At least I had the dignity to keep it at what I said, huh? It could have been worse.
Stay as far away from me as possible, f***ot.I just saw the movie and Robert Pattinson made me gay.
I don't know, "What I've done" by Linkin Park was pretty cool in Guitar hero 4....
On-topic:
Yes, the movie did have a horrible soundtrack, but that's nearly unavoidable these days. But seeing Paramore and Linkin Park on the same soundtrack only confirms my belief that America is musically ********.
if that's the guy for james then, somebody shoot me, ive heard to much of that....I just saw the movie and Robert Pattinson made me gay.