I mean I can understand people saying "Oh that match is boring" like Boss (Lol Boss probably hates me for even recording my Brinstar Matches) because for some people yes it is boring and you can voice your opinion over how enjoyable it is to watch, but to say a camping match like that is terrible and then to offer a match where a player was clearly using a less optimal strategy, I'm inclinced to either toss away BOTH videos, or allow the one where the "best" or close to best strategy was used.
It's like the difference of one of my Brinstar matches and a match where I go aggressive and 0-death Snake. Sure, the second match may be more enjoyable, but if I honestly think the campier or boring match is a better representation, I'm not gonna sacrifice a match with a great lesson to learn for a match that "looks cooler" or doesn't bore you to death.
Not only that, but the way some people react, it's as if they had NO IDEA MK could camp like this, or that they were honestly Shocked at what they saw. Most players, BY NOW, should have known that MK can camp like that (and even take it further). If you honestly had no idea that MK could play this "gay", or that the camping Dojo did was allowed, then I don't think you should have the right to pass nearly any kind of judgment over that video (this isn't aimed so much at Smashboards or the posters in this thread, but on Youtube IDK how many people were like "This was illegal, Dojo should have lost" or "DEHF would have won, but Dojo played gay so it takes away from the win". If he played inside the rules, and a SBR panel agreed that he played in the rules, then anything inside those rules is fair game no matter HOW GAY it is.)
Not to mention that I thought Dojo was actually quite vulnerable at various points while camping and DEHF didn't take advantage of that much. Not to discredit DEHF as a player obviously, but I think he could have taken a more aggressive approach to stopping Dojo from camping, or at the very least make it more dangerous/risky for Dojo to camp like that.