SnakeFighter64
Smash Obsessed
OK. But that's where the disconnect comes at the end. You can't bend that ever burning moral code that you should never take a life no matter what because of a trope of writing. That's essentially the same as IRL us advocating for killing all criminals because god is eventually gonna let them out. They have no idea in the world of the story that these villains are gonna keep getting out. Because in universe they have no reason not to. And I suppose it's fine if you limit thinking like that to fictional worlds, I will disagree with you, but it's fine I guess. But the problem comes when people start thinking that's how we should act in the real world. Which is especially problematic when we're placing this behavior in the minds of our heroes, our great and powerful icons who we should all aspire to be like.Right.
But the unsympathetic villains I write? They tend to get killed off in the end, because I'm of the strong belief that reforming them wouldn't work. There's exceptions sure, I've written my fair share of "I want to conquer/destroy the world!" characters, and they usually end on the chopping block.
I'm joining this convo late, so I don't have full context of the discussion at hand, but I'm of the belief that in regards to comic books, we've had what, 90~ years of evidence that reforming comic book baddies has a success rate of like, 2%? I'm not saying that heroes should be killing their baddies, but at the same time, reforming them almost never works either, because at the end of the day, things more or less have to return to the status quo.
Basically, that's my worry. I worry that these kinds of tropes is both A): Problematically indicitive of how the creators would want to see similar situations handled IRL, and B): will start causing people to seriously believe that this behavior is right and just.
And to think this all started with me hating the fact that the Snyder Cut exists.