Please, tell me how many Peach players have beaten Mew2King in a single game with Peach.
THAT is the top of the metagame. When I see that, I might question it, though even in that case, it's hard to question because of the way everything works in Brawl. I would be quick to wonder how much Peach experience Mew2King really has in that case.
I mean, I can and do win in-state tournaments with Pokémon Trainer. I don't claim that because I can and have reliably defeated the #2 spot on the Alabama Power Rankings (a Meta Knight player), Pokémon Trainer has the speed to keep up with the best and most knowledgeable Meta Knights. Will_ is no Mew2King.
The fact that there's always a higher point in the metagame is irrelevant. The future isn't the metagame we're talking about. This isn't about undiscovered techniques. It's about the most skillful use of what we know. While that takes more than a little theorycrafting at times, a growing metagame only matters when the growth matters significantly, generally speaking.[/QUOTE]
How many times I have to tell you NO ONE has played Peach to her full extend. NO-ONE-AT-ALL.
And I bet if a Peach was to kick his ***, there be some excuse. To seriously know if a character can't handle something is to see them at full force. If ever Peach player in the world was to play the ganon match up bad, does this mean ganon beats Peach? No one in the owrld is playing Peach to about 50% of her full ability. So they all keep losing to ganon. Or if we wanted to make a realistic example, Peach vs Link or Mario with what I just said in this paragraph.
Now if you wanted to get at this M2K stuff.
- No Peach player alive is as smart as M2K, so you bring that up is clearly insane as to no Peach player beating him.
- MK is the best in the game under the control of M2K.
- MK beats Peach.
- No Peach player has never played Peach at the hight point of her metagame. and to a point her metagame keeps growing for that matter.
So that logic with M2K does not prove anything at all.