adumb: ZSS doesn't hit MK's shield. The reason the match-up is considered to be so even by some is because ZSS easily gets him into the air and actually BEATS HIM in the air. She loses horribly on the ground and has to work pretty hard to avoid being gimped, though. There are a few very new videos of Nick playing Seibrik online.
Fun fact: uair beats glide attack
http://www.youtube.com/user/NickSRiddle#p/u/7/6bW6h1y-ONE I think Nick actually loses this set, but watch them all anyway. Video also shows how amazingly high ZSS can live with good DI.
The problem is getting him into the air in the first place, ZSS has no real way to force approach, utilt is amazing OOS, but mk can be outside of range and poke, and what is ZSS gonna do?
If you're behind, you've got no way to force an approach (don't give me that BS about neutral B, I powershield it on reaction all the time, and what are you gonna do when MK is in poking range anyway?
So, without safe on shield approaches, she's pretty stuck against MK.
I will admit tornado is amazing, but she seems to be in the same situation as marth as far as the MU goes, albiet for slightly different reasons.
Snakes air game is bad so how does that prove that Marth's ground game isn't bad or are you now changing your argument to even though his ground game is bad he still a good character? I wouldn't put too much stock on this tier list **** is balls and 90% of it is theory craft using a ruleset other than the ruleset the BBR recommends for tournies to be held. So yeah theory craft Marth tends to win out however, when it comes to actually executing it don't happen.
http://www.smashboards.com/showthread.php?t=165954
I also find it ironic that you believe that zelda is much better due to theorycraft.
I'm aware of marth move set and how the moves are used. However, his ground game is certainly lacking.
Except the thing is, it's not so much that his ground moves are lacking, it's more because his air game is too good.
That said, we need to define our terms here, I consider stuff off SH as part of the ground game, and the air game is above that.
subjective statements are subjective.
To say that his ground game is bad, or lacking, is sort of an exaggeration. It honestly doesn't debilitate him in a way that makes him unusable; otherwise, he wouldn't be high tier like he is...
It's like saying Snake's air game is bad... so what?
Almost has a great deal of anti-marth bias, so take everything he says with a grain of salt.
Not saying he can't make good points, but his bias colors his perceptions about the character overall a great deal.
Also, marth sucks, just so you know.