Haha some people in this discussion are absolutely, sublimely, pants on head ********.
I particularly enjoyed the Guy who said Roy would cut his arm off when he reached out. It would take one hell of a swing to actually remove an Arm that thick. : D
Years and years of Blade training are meaningless when not being faced by another swordsman. The fencing guy who thinks he could take a Gorilla is equally funny. I'm not even gonna go into your arguments of the "Spacing" and "Matchup" I give you simply one fact. Going back in recorded history IRL during older times lots of Swordsmen have fancied their chances against large animals, Gorillas and Bears mostly. And they got killed. They got their **** owned. The procedure to large animals turned aggressive was teams of Horseman with Lances harrying before eventually going into the kill. Although Archers were sometimes used, any swordsman who thought he could take him and there were more then a few who tried were laughed at and thought ********/insane. I care nothing for your hypothetical arguments. This **** has actually happened.
All I gotta say is "lol".
Historically humans with weapons BEAT animals, though certain styles were practically useless (spacing-centric is quite the opposite, because that takes advantage of their major weakness, overaggression), in general going with lances and arrows was just safer.
Historically weapons and planning were the reason why we were able to carve out territory as our own from the beginning of time, and that really never changed.
Minus some blips, humans>animals.
After all, which has caused many species of the other to go extict? This **** actually happened and is happening, and it's not like our group sizes were initially large either.
Also, you're wrong. Early medieval weaponry could not, but late medieval weaponry was far sharper owing to advances in metal-working, it could easily take off arms with no trouble. The rapier is a signifier of that era.