Kagesekan
Smash Journeyman
it also has the best commentary video of any game everwhy doesnt anyone say MVC2!!! its wayyy better and really technical
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
it also has the best commentary video of any game everwhy doesnt anyone say MVC2!!! its wayyy better and really technical
As technical as it is, it's been said that to pick up MVC2 competitively now is almost a waste of time, because it's impossible to catch up to people like Justin Wong in skill level.why doesnt anyone say MVC2!!! its wayyy better and really technical
People who jump in late can still compete. You just have to be willing to put in the work.
Like how Nick Riddle's Boozer wrecked your MK?Get Wrecked
the secret is to roll where he thinks you thought he thought you think he's gonna know you're gonna be.ive been playing melee ever since it came out, and competitively late 06 and i still get the stomps from jason.![]()
Hahaha, awesome.
But when it gets down to it, any self respecting natural scientist is gonna rofltao at a social scientist claiming to know facts or truths due to their science.
But then again I'm a mathematician, so I laugh at the validity of the rest of life's pursuits anyways. It's my job as an inflated ego (as all mathematicians are).
Plus sociology is common sense.
Sociology is to Mathematics as Brawl is to Melee.
hahahahahahahahahhaaI never thought I'd hear a ****** say that to or about Chops.
(wow, smashboards is gay, v@gina is stared out).
I'm terrible, too. It's still a great, fun, game though!I play guilty gear and i think im ok for being a noob
i take that back i probably super giga suck at gg
I love reading your posts so much.I'm actually quite surprised at you, Exarch. I expect you to know better than to marginalize forms of knowledge that do not rely on the rigors of mathematics.
Truth of the matter is, mathematics is simply an abstract form of expression just like any other. I could easily dismiss mathematics as "common sense" when I point to two sets of two apples and equate them to four apples (or, 2+2=4). Likewise, and more esoterically, I could articulate the various theories of relativity with mathematical equations, or articulate them philosophically with conventional languages more familiar to the average intellect.
Sociology is anything but "common sense". If I were to explain the details of Whorf-Sapir's hypothesis of language that dictates because of cultural differences, mankind as a whole can never exist on the same conscious level because grammatical syntax is humanity's primary tool in interpreting sensory experiences; I could lose mathematical and average intellects alike.
That is, unless I chose to express the concept to each class of individuals in a manner more privy to them (I tried to find a mathematical equivalent of the theory for substance to no avail. I'm sure one exists somewhere).
All sciences are an articulation of realities and attempts to understand/interpret those realities. Application of the scientific method is the only necessity when considering something to be scientific. We, here, in this very community treat the Smash games like a science. It just isn't "institutionalized" or formalized to be seen as valid science by outside or mainstream entities.
And that's really the crux here: perception. Einstein writing abstract symbols on chalk boards or chemists marrying beakers in lab coats and goggles is just that much more foreign to the mainstream than the field-work observations of many other sciences. Fact is, mainstream media, just for example, would be nothing without Philosophy, Sociology, Psychology, Economics and many other "Soft Sciences".
Mathematicians may have gotten man to the moon, but when the day comes to colonize it, well, that's a sociologist's job.
-Kimosbae
Firstly, let's be clear that I am not truly "dismissing" mathematics; I'm merely illustrating how the expressive example can be easily construed as "common sense" to the average intellect when using "common sense" principles.You take me too seriously sometimes, Kye.
Unfortunately you dismissal of Mathematics is inaccurate, because you have only shown that that group of two apples added to that other group of two apples is four apples in that case. You could prove that two plus two is four by exhausting all possible combinations of objects, but that might take some time. The only individual example used to prove something is that of a counter example, which is only used to disprove something.
Otherwise to prove 2+2=4, logic and some method of proof is necessary, and believe me the proof of this is not easy.
And Brawl is bad.
Get out of my head!!And Kye likes little tiny white girls.
Not bad on the eyes, either.Gingerr, there's this guy named "Finch." He reads books, or so I heard.
Nope, but similar to how you wrecked that guys a$$hole last night.Like how Nick Riddle's Boozer wrecked your MK?
I didn't say that. But MK > Bowser for sure. Don't make assumptions about my implications@ Kage:
Bowser isnt a bad character, do not speak on things you know nothing about.
Not really if neither player knows the matchup, its similiar to D3 vs MK....I didn't say that. But MK > Bowser for sure. Don't make assumptions about my implications
either way, what I was referencing was that he got wrecked, in reply to him commenting on what Synikal and I were discussing.Not really if neither player knows the matchup, its similiar to D3 vs MK....
Just stop posting and making yourself look stupid...