A: Doesn't matter, you haven't ever played him, so you can't judge at all.
Playing someone 2 years ago in some friendlies is about the same. It's barely relative at all to what's happening now, and while you can judge a players internal skill from playing them. It's completely player dependent if they decide to keep growing or keep up with the metagame and advance themselves.
Ex: Teh spammer is one of the smartest and most talented players I have ever played in my entire life. I would not assume he's still the same skill level. It's been years, and I am sure that right now if he entered events right now he would have trouble.
Gluttony clearly is still an amazing player, however the best both you and I can do is pull that from observations.
Playing more often wouldn't improve my ability to make judgments.
What qualifies you to make that assumption LMAO?
Do you think you can walk up and start talking to a grandmaster chess player and tell him why what he does is inherently "flawed", or how to play the game despite not putting any actual time into doing it?
C: So...? How does that even matter... I'm smart enough to see things independently.
The fact that you can barely deal with the character at a tournament level vs a player that doesn't even main the character despite having a matchup advantage is sad.
There are some players such as CJ or Pierce for instance that can clearly see into the game, however they just are flawed in game sometimes. Weather it be executions, reads, reactions, whatever.
You however half the time don't know what options to even pick, meaning that you just don't know what you're doing. Your techskill and reaction time isn't bad, your execution could use some work though... You just put yourself in garbage situations, and respond incorrectly a lot of the time.
E: Ehm.. because I don't play the game? You basically ****ed yourself here. Your entire strategy vs marth is flawed, I don't expect you to ever win if you continue this way.
You played the game enough to place sometimes. You also clearly cared enough that you where salty as **** the rest of the day and just moped
.
I'm not even close to perfect vs Marth but it's quite a stretch to say my entire strategy is flawed. At this point if I'm 3-3 with Leon and pretty much only losing to the best/2ndbest Marth in the world it's hard to just say I'm just messing up.... it's more likely I'm getting outskilled.
If you can tell me more than 1-2 small things that are clear and make sense in why I lose to ramin I'd believe you and sit down and listen. To this day nobody has been able to.
F: Ehm... no? Analytical skills are a skill, knowledge is information. Intelligence is mostly defined as the potential to do something, not the knowledge itself. Do your research bro. I might be lazy, but I'm not dumb. And tbh, not considering smash, my knowledge, analytical skills and intelligence greatly exceed yours. Funneh eh?
This has almost nothing to do with what I posted. I didnt ask you for definitions sherlock, I said that these different things clearly have a relationship. Since apparently commen sense doesn't apply to everyone you do your research, study psychology for 5 minutes and you can clearly see what I'm talking about.
Also wtf at "funneh" is that supposed to be cute? LMAO
And gtfo with the letters.
*shrug*
To criticize your entire post, get your logic straight. You're not even responding to what I posted. Instead, you try to look for obvious contradictions in my performance that don't even relate to the matter at hand.
Your performance is not relative to what is at hand no. But WHY you performed the way you did... is. You look at my post and see it simply as you lost here, so clearly you suck so you clearly don't understand. When it's more like I've seen you play, the options you pick, and the way you approach the game. If you understood half of what you where talking about you would instantly not be doing things certain ways.
It would be too easy for me to say stuff about your personal life that makes you look ********, but I won't.
I have nothing to be ashamed about. But if you're bored try?
I recommend you try to get a nice overview of the situation, and draw conclusions based on that. Device a framework based on the foundation of smash mechanics, combine that with a model of Glutonny's behavior during matches, and provide conclusions.
Have you even ever done that ever LOL. I'm actually curious legit question. If not then wtf are *****ing about. If yes, then LMAO please post, it would bring to light some of the garbage you talk about.
Your simple equivocation and ad hominem crap gets boring.
Except I rarely if ever say or point out these things.
Most of the time I respond in 1 liners or 1-3 sentences per idea.
wtf