Justblaze647
Smash Lord
Yeah... MK's jab out ranges his d-smash + the jab has a fair bit of ending lag...So you're telling me people will not use BASIC Di in order to move away from MK before he can Dsmash them from a jab?
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Yeah... MK's jab out ranges his d-smash + the jab has a fair bit of ending lag...So you're telling me people will not use BASIC Di in order to move away from MK before he can Dsmash them from a jab?
lol I can guarantee you I will get it off on you because I've gotten it off on better people (like DSF). I don't even main or play meta really he's just so stupidly easy to pick up and is just a better version of my main.jab~Dsmash<DI
You should never get jab~Dsmashed by MK under any circumstance.
Let alone that we are discussing the speed of Dsmash not why it hits -_-;
name dropper.(like DSF).
LMAO! True thatand as for jab, i really wouldnt call it large amounts of ending lag,
its more like pits side b where the hitbox stays out for a long time even after you stop mashing the button
It already is in MD/VALuigi's mansion should be banned IMO. <_<
Many reasons went into banning it, but that was obviously one...because of planking right?
Why drop DSF's name?lol I can guarantee you I will get it off on you because I've gotten it off on better people (like DSF). I don't even main or play meta really he's just so stupidly easy to pick up and is just a better version of my main.[
I love it when people call theorycrafting then actas is if they do not do it themselves.Theorycrafting is great but some things are just effing hard to get out of. technically you can SDI of most multi-hit boxes in Brawl.
Bolded part is known as straw mannning.The speed of the d-smash is discussed because it is assumed that it is so fast that you can't beat it. This is obviously not true so I was going a step ahead and suggesting why it does actually connect. honestly why did you even waste your breath with a yuna-like-nitpick.
There are no IASA frames and you can only perform the Dsmash only AFTER the jab has finished.And I'm not sure if the jab has IASA frames somewhere in there but there's a way to time it so you do d-smash ridiculously fast after the jab. I'm not a meta main or a frame data geek so I wouldn't be able to tell you exactly but it's possible to do it almost immediately after the jab.
You misread what his post meant, it wasn't an absolute "this will work every time". He said you could land a dsmash after a jab, and it wasn't always easy to dodge. Thus he name dropped DSF to demonstrate that it was possible to hit with -- if it were stupidly easy to avoid, DSF shouldn't have been caught by it. "I will get it off on you" is not "I will hit you with it every time".your guarantees mean nothing to me. Prove that MK is guaranteed to land a Dsmash after a jab 100% of the time.
Plank is a notorious ledge camper.Sorry for n00b question, what is "planking"?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=phRs10GVwvgSorry for n00b question, what is "planking"?
At about 6:45 (A little after) it looks like MK does a glide attack that gets shielded. I believe this was one of the moves claimed by M2K to be punishable on shield...but for some reason the ICs seem unable to respond before MK begins barraging them again.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LHAnxaqOltw&feature=related
I can't stand Plank. This vid is what he deserves lol. The ending is too good.
Thats an absolute.lol I can guarantee you I will get it off on you because I've gotten it off on better people (like DSF). I don't even main or play meta really he's just so stupidly easy to pick up and is just a better version of my main.
guys, he just joined, lets be gentle and no flaming please...No, why would you. Just because he has a hack does not mean he is banworthy. Smash is that series when its pointless to ban a character. I mean where would it end. Then people would want to ban snake, then ddd, it would not end!
My statement stands true. You will lose if you play me, and it will be because of your bad DI.Thats an absolute.
But it's not "I will do it 100% of the time".Thats an absolute.
It might be punishable if the person shielding was moving forward. The IC's were able to grab, but they were pushed back. If they had been running then shielded, it might have turned out much... differently ;dAt about 6:45 (A little after) it looks like MK does a glide attack that gets shielded. I believe this was one of the moves claimed by M2K to be punishable on shield...but for some reason the ICs seem unable to respond before MK begins barraging them again.
Could it have been a slightly exaggerated weakness?
Didn't I accuse you of that first? :D :D :Dname dropper.
Most moves spaced properly, especially ones with longer range aren't going to get shield grabbed all the time. If the Ic had walked forward a little bit and then threw up his shield he would've gotten a grab.At about 6:45 (A little after) it looks like MK does a glide attack that gets shielded. I believe this was one of the moves claimed by M2K to be punishable on shield...but for some reason the ICs seem unable to respond before MK begins barraging them again.
Could it have been a slightly exaggerated weakness?
So M2K's tip thread of "Shield then punish" on the glide attack was just a little understated?Most moves spaced properly, especially ones with longer range aren't going to get shield grabbed all the time. If the Ic had walked forward a little bit and then threw up his shield he would've gotten a grab.
He joined before you did....guys, he just joined, lets be gentle and no flaming please...
Did you just say that spacing to shield a predictable attack isn't easy XD? Getting your shield up within the time frame he has to attack you practically guarantees a powershield everytime too.So M2K's tip thread of "Shield then punish" on the glide attack was just a little understated?
It's "walk forward risk missing getting your shield up in time shield then grab because you pushed into MK's space unless he sees it coming and attacks early wait that's not reliable at all"
So easy!
O.o he only has 15 posts. i thought he just joined but w/e. i was just putting up his flame shield for himHe joined before you did....
>_>
And in my experience it is really hard to punish a glide attack without power shielding it. But then, it's not that hard to PS anyways.
Yes, the point of this discussion is for how it affects real people playing a real game. Not about what you technically or theoretically can do.Why drop DSF's name?
Just because you may do it on DSF doesn't say anything to prove your point.
That's not silly that just proves that you've never played a MK that's tried it on you.here let me show you why such a thing is silly.
I have never gotten Dsmashed after MK has jabbed me.
its basically the same support as you did.
I theorycraft? I'm one of the biggest supporters of saying things based on experience and knowledge of a matchup. Please know what you're talking about before you say it.I love it when people call theorycrafting then actas is if they do not do it themselves.
I guess it changes when people drop names or something at which point, lets all use anecdotal evidence to prove our points.
difficulty is relative I'm sure someone of your debating abilities understands this. And relatively in a match with a lot on a line people screw up.As for those moves that you can SDI out of.
Which can actually be done.
SDI out of tornado, Sheik's Fsmash, Zelda's Fsmash and Usmash.
All of those are not too difficult to perform difficult to perform.
The hitdelay is greater and the hitstun is much smaller.
Please stop talking as if you're the only one that knows how to break down a debate. I can assure you I can break down your argument modus ponen style but I save that for actually useful debates and not one with a random on the internet.Bolded part is known as straw mannning.
no one said that the Dsmash could not be beat.
So why did you even waste the time to type that response?
News flash: you don't have the best tech skill in the game. And I know you can SDI out of it. I didn't say you couldn't. I said in a real life situation you might screw up. Which you would do against me.There are no IASA frames and you can only perform the Dsmash only AFTER the jab has finished.
The jab has a good amount of cool down time and due to its multihit nature (as well as the increased hit delay) SDI away before the Dsmash lands is not difficult at all.
It doesn't matter if it doesn't work 100% of the time because it will work on YOU, as well as MOST PLAYERS. How do I know? Just from personal experience being on the receiving end and the dealing end of this.your guarantees mean nothing to me. Prove that MK is guaranteed to land a Dsmash after a jab 100% of the time.
we dont care about that right now, personally i dont care if we have to ban more broken characters in order to make the game better in tourneys, but we arent talking about that, we will deal with the issue of banning other characters when that topic comes up, but as of right now we are talking about banning MK, so pls focus on that topicNo, why would you. Just because he has a hack does not mean he is banworthy. Smash is that series when its pointless to ban a character. I mean where would it end. Then people would want to ban snake, then ddd, it would not end!
Thanks for proving my argument.My statement stands true. You will lose if you play me, and it will be because of your bad DI.
But keep theorycrafting on a internet forum it'll get you far irl.
Cause dropping names totally supports your argument.Yes, the point of this discussion is for how it affects real people playing a real game. Not about what you technically or theoretically can do.
No it doesn't dude. It just says an MK has never landed the Dsmash on me after the jab. it says nothing about the Mk attempting it.That's not silly that just proves that you've never played a MK that's tried it on you.
You did not theory craft?I theorycraft? I'm one of the biggest supporters of saying things based on experience and knowledge of a matchup. Please know what you're talking about before you say it.
Theory?It doesn't matter if it doesn't work 100% of the time because it will work on YOU, as well as MOST PLAYERS.
Again where are you getting such ideas?Please stop talking as if you're the only one that knows how to break down a debate. I can assure you I can break down your argument modus ponen style but I save that for actually useful debates and not one with a random on the internet.
*facepalm*stuff
Which is why you continue to post.My reason is just to make you realize how stupid big your e-p3nis is. No one cares.
Baseless assumptions get you nowhere dude.News flash: you don't have the best tech skill in the game.
you said and I quoteAnd I know you can SDI out of it. I didn't say you couldn't. I said in a real life situation you might screw up. Which you would do against me.
you said you guarantee it, does that not insinuate that you will be capable of always landing it.I landed it on DSF
really? prove you will land it on me most of the time please.It doesn't matter if it doesn't work 100% of the time because it will work on YOU, as well as MOST PLAYERS.
gee how?How do I know?
OMG PERSONAL EXPERIENCE! MY ARGUMENT IS REFUTED!Just from personal experience being on the receiving end and the dealing end of this.
Really? Prove this now.If you're wary of this specific combination all the time then you fall for other stuff easier.
I'm definitely more convincing, go for it.Didn't I accuse you of that first? :D :D :D
I'm going to namedrop you from now on k?