Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Er. I feel like the argument "Sakurai has never done a promotional character for Zelda" is about as flimsy as the "Sakurai hasn't upgraded an assist trophy" argument that would disconfirm Skull Kid...Skull Kid is the only Zelda rep I see happening. He's popular, has a essy assist to replace, and represents a beloved game. Honestly though, BOTW2 rep ain't happening; promo chars aren't liked and Sakurai has never done one for Zelda...
Xenoblade could use a 2nd rep and DK is still missing Dixie. So no.Zelda is the only under rep'd series.
I think you need a little bit more than that for your scores to count at the end of the day. There is a two sentence requirement for both chance and want.hmm another zelda character
chances: 5% i dont think its ever gonna happen again, not that i a pessimist
want: 100% the more zelda the better
I don't know if I'd say it's as flimsy, the Assist Trophy thing is on thin ice given the situation with ARMS. Whereas sadly, "Sakurai treats Zelda like ****" isn't something with an end in sight, yet.Er. I feel like the argument "Sakurai has never done a promotional character for Zelda" is about as flimsy as the "Sakurai hasn't upgraded an assist trophy" argument that would disconfirm Skull Kid...
True, but I don't see how Skull Kid would be an exception to this. Zelda is underrepresented (or over-represented via clone characters, if you'd rather) and you certainly could make the argument that Sakurai has had plenty of chances to represent Zelda better and passed up on every one (even though Nintendo is picking the DLC now). That'd be a fair, if pessimistic, argument against all Zelda newcomers.I don't know if I'd say it's as flimsy, the Assist Trophy thing is on thin ice given the situation with ARMS. Whereas sadly, "Sakurai treats Zelda like ****" isn't something with an end in sight, yet.
OK, Zelda & Xenoblade are both under rep'd. Thats it thoughXenoblade could use a 2nd rep and DK is still missing Dixie. So no.
And DK still needs Dixie, as I said before.OK, Zelda & Xenoblade are both under rep'd. Thats it though
That's very unfair. Sure, no Zelda character has reached the demand of K. Rool or Ridley, but who has? Lots of Zelda characters have varying degrees of popularity. K. Rool and Ridley also had the advantage of not having nearly as much intra-series competition as any Zelda character; the Zelda fanbase is highly splintered amongst many characters, so it's honestly incredible that some manage to still reach such levels of support.You never saw people going Skull Kid for Smash or Impa for Smash compared to the likes of K.Rool or Ridley, who also come from franchises who were seen as underrepresented and yet their demand was FAR more larger than any Zelda rep, which for me implies this is done for tokenism sake, rather than actual passion
Aww thanks so much, and Zero Suit Violet is definitely as big a Midna fan as I am a Skull Kid fan.That's very unfair. Sure, no Zelda character has reached the demand of K. Rool or Ridley, but who has? Lots of Zelda characters have varying degrees of popularity. K. Rool and Ridley also had the advantage of not having nearly as much intra-series competition as any Zelda character; the Zelda fanbase is highly splintered amongst many characters, so it's honestly incredible that some manage to still reach such levels of support.
And the lack of passion... Just, no. Don't go that way. I know that NintenRob and Zero Suit Violet are amongst the most dedicated thread managers I've seen, so I won't stand for such a dismissal of the dedication of them and so many other fans.
Awwww, thank you so much for noticing, and taking the time to notify me here, it means a whole lot to me!That's very unfair. Sure, no Zelda character has reached the demand of K. Rool or Ridley, but who has? Lots of Zelda characters have varying degrees of popularity. K. Rool and Ridley also had the advantage of not having nearly as much intra-series competition as any Zelda character; the Zelda fanbase is highly splintered amongst many characters, so it's honestly incredible that some manage to still reach such levels of support.
And the lack of passion... Just, no. Don't go that way. I know that NintenRob and Zero Suit Violet are amongst the most dedicated thread managers I've seen, so I won't stand for such a dismissal of the dedication of them and so many other fans.
really? ive gotten away with it beforeI think you need a little bit more than that for your scores to count at the end of the day. There is a two sentence requirement for both chance and want.
Ok, but why does DK need another in general? Zelda is the 2nd/3rd biggest franchise from Nintendo, but only has variations of the triforce trio. I accepted Xenoblade because XB2 was a popular game, and XB1 is getting a remake next month.And DK still needs Dixie, as I said before.
While I agree for Ganon and Tetra, there's one thing you forgot about Smash - Link, Zelda and Ganondorf all have had their appearances (+ movesets) change. So what if Impa's design vary from one game to another? Sakurai could either pick one or mix parts of them together. Besides, if Toadette is anythign to go by, Nintendo isn't afraid on capitalising on a popular character, even if said popularity is only recent.Impa's design varies greatly between young female warrior and elderly grandmother chieftan and until Hyrule Warriors and Skyward Sword she was a largely ignored character with very few fans.
I agree that Zelda is bigger than DK and deserves another rep just as much or even more, but DKC or the DK franchise is Nintendo's 4th best selling series despite it having spin offs and two mainline games in the past two decades since Rare have left. Plus DK and Mario debut in the same game so DK is equally as important as Mario to Miyamoto and Nintendo. It even shows in the roster number in where DK is listed as number #2 being possibly made in Smash after Mario and before Link. DKC was really popular in the 90s and DK is one of Miyamoto's babies so another DK rep especially Dixie Kong is long overdue and deserving of being in the roster. Dixie is to DKC what Peach and Bandana Dee are to Mario and Kirby. Can't picture perfect DKC representation in the roster without having DK, Diddy, K. Rool, and Dixie all together. They're the Mario, Luigi, Bowser, and Peach to DKC.Ok, but why does DK need another in general? Zelda is the 2nd/3rd biggest franchise from Nintendo, but only has variations of the triforce trio. I accepted Xenoblade because XB2 was a popular game, and XB1 is getting a remake next month.
Whats the case for DK and (and because it was mentioned above) Kirby? If it's just puerly because "every other franchise got some" or "no new reps since brawl" we're going to agree to disagree. If it's something else, help me understand please.
For the record, I also think Zelda has been overlooked for a long time, hence my previous rating for this. (The wording here kinda implies that I didn't).DK needs Dixie, that I agree on. Very much so. But it's not like Zelda isn't overlooked either, and hasn't been for a very long time.
If you didn't meet the minimum two sentence requirement in the past then I can assure you those ratings weren't counted either.really? ive gotten away with it before
We already know the ARMS character's gimmick though: they have long, extendable arms. That's enough of an unprecedented mechanic to justify any ARMS character.To make the Arms character stand out, they'd need a gimmick that's unlike what we've seen before, and SM, RG and Jara don't exactly scream "unprecedented mechanics" now do they?