Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
i'm pretty sure.....since like B+but the indi weaknesses have been removed haven't they?
B+ never removed weaknesses because it wasn't possible, dunno why you think they've been fixable since B+ lol.i'm pretty sure.....since like B+
the fire is just a gfx
ZSS Dair gives her a bounce if she hits an enemy or their shield with it.Ya.. After watching further and seeing how much trouble he had getting around Din's I take back my statement about them being slightly faster @_@
Maybe make them disappear if they hit your shield? Less priority so you can cut through them easier?
Idk. But the slower movement seems like a step in the right direction.
Oh, that's cool.ZSS Dair gives her a bounce if she hits an enemy or their shield with it.
As far as Din's Fire clankability, the lingering hitbox only does 8 damage fresh. Any attack that deals damage will clank them out and keep the explosion from happening. They don't really have much "priority" and the hitbox size is quite manageable unless you let her channel them for a while before setting them. The shielding thing is an oddity and I'm still up in the air about how to fix that, or if I want to.
If the projectile speed of Din's is adjusted, I would consider at least making the fireball outpace Zelda herself when used in the air.
Also Wifi between CA and NJ may skew your opinions, because we could be dealing with each other's projectiles much easier than what was shown.
$10 MM bo5 my DK?
careful there Supreme DirtArrow arc.
![]()
That's bad why?Arrow arc.
![]()
That sounds completely ********...on what grounds are they trying to pass this on?So has anyone else heard about the Anti Streaming Bill Congress is trying to pass? I know this is somewhat irrelevant to P:M, but this is crucial to Internet culture as a whole, so I thought I'd help raise awareness. Basically if it were passed JCaesar and anyone who has watched his stream could be jailed for up to five years (yes I know enforcement would be nigh impossible, but the mere possibility should scare you). Needless to say that much is relevant to all of us.
Go here for more info:That sounds completely ********...on what grounds are they trying to pass this on?
Mainly copyrght junk. The MPAA, RIAA, etc. decided they wanted to send the Internet back to 1999 so they could make more money so I'm guessing they gave a bunch of Congressmen money or something to win their support. I guess we could still have back alley exchanges of bootleg P:M VHS tapes.That sounds completely ********...on what grounds are they trying to pass this on?
Basically if anything it wouldn't be dealing with smash streaming if anything it has to do with amount of people using streaming sites for free PPV's such as lets say for example ufc, WWE, TNA etc. (basically anything sports/copy right related) Which I can perfectly understand. But I do agree it does suck for the internet as a whole because what are they gonna do start charging for streams? I know the government already hit some torrent websites also that come to mind.So has anyone else heard about the Anti Streaming Bill Congress is trying to pass? I know this is somewhat irrelevant to P:M, but this is crucial to Internet culture as a whole, so I thought I'd help raise awareness. Basically if it were passed JCaesar and anyone who has watched his stream could be jailed for up to five years (yes I know enforcement would be nigh impossible, but the mere possibility should scare you). Needless to say that much is relevant to all of us.