Fawriel said:
Ness kind of..... defeated the personified essence of all that is evil. I think he's not exactly defenseless.
Nonsense. Everyonw knows Pokey's the real hero of Earthbound.
Black/Light said:
Actually, it was never said that vets wouldn't be replaced (So I don't see that as a facture personally).
Well, there's no reason to believe otherwise. Unless...do you have one?
I'm using the same logic here as I do with the whole "starters haven't been playable before, so they won't now" thing, which I'll get to later on in this post.
Black/Light said:
Plus, her popularity outside of Smash is gone and has moved onto Lop and/or Bun in the place she was popular. . .Japan.
But Jiggs is still a popular Smash character. Alot of people here couldn't imagine a Smash Bros. game without the 'Puff.
Black/Light said:
And what does having a move-set have to do with anything? .
Well, if they're on the fence about switching out Jiggs for Lopunny (or something), the fact that Jiggs already has a proven, fun, and unique moveset could tilt the odds in it's favor.
I'm saying that by staying with Jiggs, they wouldn't run therisk of creating a character that Smahers either hate or love to use. No risk involved in keeping Jiggs.
Black/Light said:
She took the popularity and can very well have a moveset. . . and why would she have to have the "vet facture" to replace Puff?
Oh sure, Lopunny could have a moveset. It's moves are perfect for it. But so are Hitmonlee's moves. And Tyrogue's, and Infernape's, and Deoxys'...and so on. So that's a bit irrelevant.
She wouldn't have to have veteran status, I'm just pointing out that she doesn't have that, and so that's one thing Jiggs has over Lopunny.
Black/Light said:
Theres still only one pokemon in the game that has stared in a movie. By that logic only legendary pokemon should get in. Plus, if anime appearance was soo important than Meowth would have been in over Jpuff
Lucario or Meowth aren't legendary, and they're on my list.
You do raise a good point in you rlast sentence. It's the only real argument against Meowth that I'm aware of. Of course, I could counter with the idea that Jiggs could have been included due to time restraints, or that Meowth was already a Pokeball Pokemon...but I won't, because those are weak points. You've got me there, but that alone doesn't eliminate Meowth's chances.
Black/Light said:
??? That is, up until a few months ago, THE latest world wide gen. Can't see them jumping over the 3rd gen to assume what people would like for the 4th way back when the roster was being made
Thus there's only one 4th gen on my list, and a 3rd gen as well. If
past precedents are anything to go by (and they are), we won't see new Pokemon come exsclusively from one gen, or one gen getting a majority.
Black/Light said:
. . .I don't get your list. Deoxy is the only one out side of Pika thats proven to atleast be a popular movie pokemon in Japan yet your whole point was that he would choose characters popular in both Japan and US.
For crap's sake, where are you getting this information on who's popular or not!? Are you trying to tell me that Meowth and Lucario have absolutely no, or an unusually low fanbase across the Pacific?
If the GTS is anything to go by (and it's probably not), Lucario has it's fans. Lucario's well known in both regions, and Meowth is a mainstay in every movie and episode of the show, not to mention being one of the few viable 1st gen (probably the most relevant overall) representatives that hasn't been playable yet.
Black/Light said:
Pichu was probly added as both a 2nd gen rep and because Raichu also did well on the melee most wanted Japan list (Pika forms sell).
I think Pichu was actually added because, as we both know, Melee had a really bad production schedule, and with a need for more characters came about clones, which Pichu is one of. I honestly don't think Pichu would've been included if not for that time restraint, and that there aren't too many Pokemon that could work as Mewtwo or Jigglypuff clones.
Black/Light said:
Absence of evidence=/=evidence of absence. Just cause we have yet to see a starter as a playable doesn't mean that one can't be playable in this game. Same with event only pokemon. Same for pokemon that have only been in the anime once or twice.
I'm
not saying it's impossible, just unlikely. I'm
not using this an an excuse to permanently ban any starter Pokemon from being playable. I'm
not laying it down as a rule. Anything can happen, just like you say.
What I
am saying is that there's no prior evidence. What evidence is there points to every starter being in some form other than playable. This is called a "precedent", which is "any act, decision, or case that serves as a guide or justification for subsequent situations."
In this case, the precedent of Blastoise, Charizard, Venusaur, Chikorita, Cynaquil and Totodile
not being playable characters is a case that serves as a guide for subsequent situations.
The subseqquent situation being what Pokemon are in Brawl.