I never once said, nor implied that anyone was not imaginative or uncreative. I was saying that people
aren't using their creativity as much as they probably could. I mean, of course when you play a "bad" character, you have to acknowledge their weakness', but
you should always acknowledge their strengths too. I'm being optimistic not only because I'm initially looking at their strengths, but also
because nobody else is. You cannot honestly tell me I'm wrong in my analysis when you probably haven't even researched a lick of what I'm talking about, especially when I even said I don't know everything about Charizard yet. Keep in mind I've already "proven my worth" with just
alone . My area is basically a Brawl farmland now, so unless you have an Abra that can teleport me halfway across the country for active tournament scenes, I'm gonna' continue to encourage people through the other means I'm able to use. Whether you like it or not, is not my problem.
I was saying that most of the Brawl Jiggly's
don't use it that way hardly ever. The few that do/did don't even really play anymore.
Admittedly, when I first replied to your earlier comment, I misinterpreted what you meant by "stalling", so my bad on that. but again, my point was just saying that things like that are
possible. Regardless of the character doing it.
I meant
character boards. Lol, of course it'd be tough to pan out
if he's the ONLY one coming up with new concepts or ideas.
Like, I'm not even trying to be rude or anything, but when people only state things from what a character
can't do, it turns people off from playing that character because of a more negative perception of it. Are they right? Absolutely. Does that automatically make a character non-viable in tournament?
Of course not, because again, those same characters have strengths too. For example; despite being a heavyweight, Charizard actually has the the 7th fastest dash speed and the second longest non-tether grab range in the game.
The reason why a lot of these characters are "bad" is because people are looking at it from a perspective of what a character's moveset and statistics does, and much less of
what you can do with those options. I'm definitely not saying Ivysaur or Charizard is a Grade-A character, but they certainly shouldn't be slept on by any means.
and tbh, the only other reason they are low on the tier list is because of a lack of representation. As it's largely based on tournament results. No representation=no results.
So yes, I'm optimistic about what they can do by working around their weaknesses. Because as far as I'm concerned, all I'm hearing is a lot of pessimism of how so and so can't do this and that cause' of said limitations, yet nobody is doing the research to try to push things ahead. Then you wonder why the overall metagame basically stays stagnant.