ryuu seika
Smash Master
Ganondorf used this power in an OoT cutscene to abduct Zelda.In Twilight Princess
He could make barriers
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Ganondorf used this power in an OoT cutscene to abduct Zelda.In Twilight Princess
He could make barriers
In Capcom's (and Arcsys as well), defense, part of the reason that's done is to alleviate downloading times and so that everyone can play each other while not missing data in the hard drive. Also, it turns out that the DLC is also used to make other things free or reduce the costs. Some of the DLC stuff later on in SSFIV was made free because of costume sales.No, DLC could work for SSB4! No need to worry about if the Cafe has a hardrive or not... Just do what Capcom does... Put all of the DLC on the actual disk, and make you pay an extra fee to unlock it.
Part of the problem with that is that every time a character is added, you have to rebalance everything. Look at SSFIV which added ten characters and then four more with AE. They did the balancing after adding those batches of characters in. With BBCS2, Makoto, Mu, and Valkenhayn were added to CS1 originally, but they were done in a way that did not change the balance of the others (which wasn't all that great), but they were rebalanced with Platinum the Trinity included.QFT. The roster can be balanced while characters are added slowly. Not sure why this is so hard to understand.
Knuckle Joe has a very decent fanbase. He's the only other Kirby character besides King Dedede and Meta Knight who is loved by fans. He's gained lots of popularity, and most were disappointed by the fact he was an AT in Brawl rather than playable. That's why a lot of people have been hacking the game and making him that. So I think he'd make a cool playable character.The problem with knuckle joe is... well....
Why Knuckle Joe? Even if Kirby really deserved a character (I'd find it hard to believe that), why would a common enemy deserve to be in? I can off-hand name several characters from Kirby that deserve to be in first.
Buggzy, Bonkers, Rick the Hamster, Paint Roller, Chef Kawasaki, Marx, Pon and Con... Heck, if we're going into common enemies, what about Waddle Dee, Waddle Doo, and Sword/Blade Knight? What about Biospark? Is this all because he got an assist trophy?
No AT is as far as I would care to see Knuckle Joe implemented in a Smash game. Why? Because he is just a random minor enemy in the Kirby games that happens to look cool. If he is a playable character they might as well make a goomba a playable character next. Also, what the heck are you talking about he is the only other character liked by fans? I seriously doubt that's true. For example, I like Gooey.Knuckle Joe has a very decent fanbase. He's the only other Kirby character besides King Dedede and Meta Knight who is loved by fans. He's gained lots of popularity, and most were disappointed by the fact he was an AT in Brawl rather than playable. That's why a lot of people have been hacking the game and making him that. So I think he'd make a cool playable character.
If Captain Falcon and Ganondorf can work with the same moveset and are from completely different series I'm pretty sure two similar pokemon can work with the same moveset as well.mewtwo and lucario could never work off the same moveset... jussayin.
That'd be stupid. Make it a Shy Guy.If he is a playable character they might as well make a goomba a playable character next.
Compare this: http://youtu.be/KqYpvXIZ4Csmewtwo and lucario could never work off the same moveset... jussayin.
Well at least a Shy Guy would be more important to it's series then Knuckle Joe is to his own. Lol. Both should just be AT at the most though.That'd be stupid. Make it a Shy Guy.
I'm fully aware of how both of them play.
What exactly is the issue here? Are people saying that Mewtwo will come back in SSB4 to replace Lucario? To be honest, I figured they'd keep Lucario and add Zoroark for 5 Pokemon reps. I mean, as much as I love the first gen over the others, it already has 3 reps besides Mewtwo. Why not keep Lucario who is fresher in mind from Brawl and add a cool new moveset for Zoroark?I'm fully aware of how both of them play.
Mewtwo= grabs with telekenisis, picks things up with telekenesis. rarely uses anything other than his tail to physically strike the opponent
Lucario= can't use telekenisis, fights with mainly martial arts.
other than the fact that they throw energy balls they are polar opposites.
I would buy it. Its near perfect. The ONLY problem being Geno. Some are saying that Professor Layton is 3rd party, im not sure. I assumed he was second. If he is 3rd, then it would be a little overkill to have him, Geno and Simon. Level 5 and Konami would gladly give up their characters, but Square Enix would be difficult. Id just remove Geno. Layton and Simon are both more relevant to their own series and Nintendo in general. Layton, the most relevant, being one of the most prominent DS franchises, and Simon being the start of the Castlevania series, which other than the ds titles, hasn't appeared on a Nintendo Console in a while. If people want him Geno so bad, he can be added at a latter time through dlc when they've had time to negotiate more, but you can guarantee that his rights will be difficult to acquire.What exactly is the issue here? Are people saying that Mewtwo will come back in SSB4 to replace Lucario? To be honest, I figured they'd keep Lucario and add Zoroark for 5 Pokemon reps. I mean, as much as I love the first gen over the others, it already has 3 reps besides Mewtwo. Why not keep Lucario who is fresher in mind from Brawl and add a cool new moveset for Zoroark?
Anyways, here is a roster I think would be cool and mostly logical:
Mario Franchise:
1. Mario
2. Luigi
3. Peach
4. Bowser
5. Toad
6. Geno
Pokemon Franchise:
7. Pikachu
8. Jiggly****
9. Pokemon Trainer
10. Lucario
11. Zoroark
Zelda Franchise:
12. Link
13. Zelda/Shiek
14. Ganondorf
15. Toon Link
Kirby Franchise:
16. Kirby
17. King Dedede
18. Meta Knight
Donkey Kong Franchise:
19. Donkey Kong
20. Diddy Kong
21. K. Rool
Metroid Franchise:
22. Samus/ZSS
23. Ridley
Fire Emblem Franchise:
24. Marth
25. Ike
26. Lyn (Or anyone else. I don't feel qualified to make the judgement call.)
Wario Ware Franchise:
27. Wario
Yoshi's Island Franchise:
28. Yoshi
Starfox Franchise:
29. Fox
30. Falco
31. Wolf
32. Krystal
Earthbound Franchise:
33. Ness
34. Lucas
Retro Franchises:
35. Pit
36. Mr. Game and Watch
37. Ice Climbers
38. R.O.B.
39. Little Mac
Pikmin Franchise:
40. Olimar
Animal Crossing Franchise:
41. Tom Nook
F Zero Franchise:
42. Captain Falcon
43. Samurai Goroh
Golden Sun Franchise:
44. Isaac
Professor Layton Franchise:
45. Professor Layton
Third Party Franchises:
46. Snake
47. Sonic
48. Simon Belmont
Advance Wars Franchise:
49. Andy
Sin and Punishment Franchise:
50. Saki
This is actually a pretty good list however there are some problems. First, Konami shouldn't have two representatives since they are a 3rd party. Another company should get the chance to be represented instead like Capcom with Megaman. Second, there questionable statuses with some of the characters you listed. Geno, while a Mario character is owned by Square and therefore a 3rd party character. Layton is owned by Level 5 which is a 3rd party, so he is a 3rd party character. He just has exclusively appeared on Nintendo systems so far. Sin & Punishment I'm also not sure is 1st party. It says on the wiki page that both Nintendo R&D and Treasure were the developers of the 1st one so I'm not sure who owns the rights.What exactly is the issue here? Are people saying that Mewtwo will come back in SSB4 to replace Lucario? To be honest, I figured they'd keep Lucario and add Zoroark for 5 Pokemon reps. I mean, as much as I love the first gen over the others, it already has 3 reps besides Mewtwo. Why not keep Lucario who is fresher in mind from Brawl and add a cool new moveset for Zoroark?
Anyways, here is a roster I think would be cool and mostly logical:
Mario Franchise:
1. Mario
2. Luigi
3. Peach
4. Bowser
5. Toad
6. Geno
Pokemon Franchise:
7. Pikachu
8. Jiggly****
9. Pokemon Trainer
10. Lucario
11. Zoroark
Zelda Franchise:
12. Link
13. Zelda/Shiek
14. Ganondorf
15. Toon Link
Kirby Franchise:
16. Kirby
17. King Dedede
18. Meta Knight
Donkey Kong Franchise:
19. Donkey Kong
20. Diddy Kong
21. K. Rool
Metroid Franchise:
22. Samus/ZSS
23. Ridley
Fire Emblem Franchise:
24. Marth
25. Ike
26. Lyn (Or anyone else. I don't feel qualified to make the judgement call.)
Wario Ware Franchise:
27. Wario
Yoshi's Island Franchise:
28. Yoshi
Starfox Franchise:
29. Fox
30. Falco
31. Wolf
32. Krystal
Earthbound Franchise:
33. Ness
34. Lucas
Retro Franchises:
35. Pit
36. Mr. Game and Watch
37. Ice Climbers
38. R.O.B.
39. Little Mac
Pikmin Franchise:
40. Olimar
Animal Crossing Franchise:
41. Tom Nook
F Zero Franchise:
42. Captain Falcon
43. Samurai Goroh
Golden Sun Franchise:
44. Isaac
Professor Layton Franchise:
45. Professor Layton
Third Party Franchises:
46. Snake
47. Sonic
48. Simon Belmont
Advance Wars Franchise:
49. Andy
Sin and Punishment Franchise:
50. Saki
The pokemon movie can easily just be passed off as advertisement for the game.Still think that my roster I posted awhile back is good, except for the DLC part and Lucario.
And I have to admit, people can be incredibly stupid when it comes to discussions regarding SSB4. I was one of those people early on, but I changed quickly with suggestions on how to improve my roster. Now looking back at IGN's SSB4 thread, it is just awful. Only a few people bother to make reasonable posts there and as a result, discussion regarding SSB4 has pretty much died. There was even at time when false announcement regarding DLC was made back in October, 2009, and I just *facepalmed*. Strangely enough, this was the reason why I joined it, but I stay here for a much different reason now.
Also, I'm getting a feeling that Lucario will likely be replaced in the next installment. Why? Mainly because I just figured that he originated in an anime movie. Granted, it is a Pokemon movie, but it's set in the anime Pokemon world and he did not originate in a video game. Once the developers figure that out (They probably already have), he will be removed faster then you can say "Which character from Brawl gets removed next?". Replacement will probably be a 5th gen Pokemon character.
Except the fact that Melee Samus was based on Super Metroid, in which you were relatively slow unless dashing and jumps were floaty and slow. Brawl Samus was based on Metroid Prime, in which you "walked" through the entire game with slow floaty jumps. In Other M and Zero Mission, Samus is fast with fast jumps. Sakurai needs to fix it.You do realize that Samus has pretty much always been fast in her Power Suit right? If Samus wasn't fast in the other Smash games, she probably won't be in the next one.
I can see this either being a bad thing or a really good thing. On one hand, because of his personal bias he won't include characters like Tom Nook despite his popularity. However, what would happen if it is someone else or Nintendo themselves that were in charge? I can see the entire Earthbound series being removed, no more series that are only from Japan making an appearance and some really dumb choices like some random enemy from a Mario game. Tripping sucks and all but I'm worried what might happen if Sakurai doesn't return. Didn't Nintendo just wanted to port Melee to the Wii with some online? Well then again, they would of probably spent more time on the online and made it actually functional. : PIn the past, inclusion was 100% up to Sakurai and will continue to be if he happens to be working on the next smash. His personal bias or opinions outweigh all logical reasons for a character to be included. After that, everything else is looked at, but even that is from Sakurai's point of view so sometimes accurate speculation is just impossible.
Because SquareEnix owns him and from what I heard, don't lend their characters out too often. If this wasn't the case he would of made it into Brawl when there was the most hype for him.Well then with that criteria, I see no reason why Geno wouldn't be included. Unless there's more at play, that is.
1. Geno would not be bland and many people want him in (although I am indifferent).
2. I've never played Mario RPG and don't know much about Geno, but he's a puppet and that in itself is unique. From what I heard, he has plenty of unique potential.
3. Check.
And I don't even like him.
Sakurai mentioned his criteria not long after the last game came out. The three requirements are as follows:I'm curious as to what is the general ranking system for people to get in. There are a lot of different views of who should be in. Is it their iconicness to the genre and Nintendo? Is it moveset potential? Or is it just popularity? Is it how balance of all the above? Or none of the above.