ToiseOfChoice
Smash Ace
I got all lonely in this thread wondering where all the people who prefer Brawl to Melee went, then I got hungry instead.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Yeah but all the new ones are rubbish.LARGER amount of viable stages
I don't know what he means by sticky, but campy would refer to how your best options are to be defensive and that the risk involved on going on the offensive is not proportional to the reward in successfully attacking. You're better off spamming Falco's lasers than to try approaching with Ganondorf period.Campy? Sticky? Explain.
Clearly you don't remember the amazingly unusable stages of Brinstar Depths, Venom, Yoshi's Island 64, Icicle Mountain, Temple, and Mushroom Kingdom 64. >_>Yeah but all the new ones are rubbish.
And I don't exactly like how you assume that me saying I much prefered the Non-Brawl stages means that I think the older ones were more useable.Clearly you don't remember the amazingly unusable stages of Brinstar Depths, Venom, Yoshi's Island 64, Icicle Mountain, Temple, and Mushroom Kingdom 64. >_>
Seriously, 64 had a whopping one stage without noticable elements (Dreamland), while Melee had a few (Final Destination, Battlefield, Yoshi's Story, Fountain of Dreams), and Brawl has as many as Melee (Final Destination, Battlefield, Smashville, Lylat Cruise)
I hate when people automatically think that the older games had more usable stages, they all had at least 40% broken stages.
And I hate how you assume that I think the older stages were usable just because I hate the Brawl ones. Brawl stages may or may not be more usable but they sure are less fun.I hate when people automatically think that the older games had more usable stages, they all had at least 40% broken stages.
Campy? Sticky? Explain.
Good job Kuma. this is basically what I meant. If you watch a competitive game (note, I'm not trying to advocate for competitive vs casual, this just simply uses extremes to iterate my point.) Most often it will be character X *coughmetaknightcouchcouch* against character y and once character x gets a lead he stalls whichever way is best for his character. I saw a match where the it was MK vs. Diddy in which the match consisted of both of them feinti jumping at the other. At one point, the match stopped and they taunted a bit because MK was camping behind the rock wall in Pokestadium.I don't know what he means by sticky, but campy would refer to how your best options are to be defensive and that the risk involved on going on the offensive is not proportional to the reward in successfully attacking. You're better off spamming Falco's lasers than to try approaching with Ganondorf period.
I saw that one. Reminded me why I haven't gone back to playing Brawl. Do you have the link though?Good job Kuma. this is basically what I meant. If you watch a competitive game (note, I'm not trying to advocate for competitive vs casual, this just simply uses extremes to iterate my point.) Most often it will be character X *coughmetaknightcouchcouch* against character y and once character x gets a lead he stalls whichever way is best for his character. I saw a match where the it was MK vs. Diddy in which the match consisted of both of them feinti jumping at the other. At one point, the match stopped and they taunted a bit because MK was camping behind the rock wall in Pokestadium.
first there were no combos in brawl
then the metagame developed
and now there is not even hitting in brawl
everytime someone talks about brawl I'm going to show them this video
Are you saying you honestly like brawl stage design? I'm not saying the stage design of Melee was "epic" as it wasn't really (outside of the FD improvements) but it was a lot more fun.You've got odd parameters on what are epic and fun, you know that RS? I mean, unless you're either hung up on the aesthetics, or really liked Brinstar Depths, Brawl pretty much has everything Melee had to offer plus more.
Oh come on, be more vague. You could've said "I just don't like it as much" and that'd be that.The "epicness" of Melee was almost entirely in the feel of the gameplay. Brawl changed this an now it feels empty and as though they tried to make it more epic and ended up making it less so.
Music of this "game"....There was music from the Game Boy Camera?
Random Nintendo music or visuals or whatever in various places. Can't remember everything, but I know they had a ton of Mario/Pokemon images and stamps in the albums section, G&W Ball in the games section, and a bit from Sheriff and a song from Mother in the credits. Same deal with Melee's All-Star rest area song being from Kirby Super Star save points.....There was music from the Game Boy Camera? Or are you saying that the Game Boy Camera had random Nintendo music in other places?
Anyways, while I doubt they'd do that, there probably will be a couple of random ones thrown in there, such as Squirtle's Koopa shell sound effect. Of course, the odds probably would increase for a random song, if all of the songs weren't remixed versions of the main theme. :V
Well, Medusa, Jody and Eggplant Wizard are not actually on my roster. If you're curious, my ideal SSB4 roster, not including DLC or anything, is...You got some good ideas there, although similar versions of that have already been posted a ton of times. You might want to format it better if you want more people to read all of it. My concern with the whole branching thing is that it'd take away from some of what makes Smash Bros. special. There really aren't many other games that attempt to do what it does, and in most genres, like sports, DDR, or racing, it just doesn't seem like the characters would be able to be all that different from each other to where it would be all that different from some other sports or racing game. The roster is mostly what I'd expect to see, except for a few characters like Medusa, Jody, and Eggplant Wizard. I'd prefer to see more new series added but that's just my opinion.
This sounds dumb. The name itself prohibits this.My first point-The Smash Brothers Franchise needs to branch out.
I hate to break it to you but Bowser Jr. hasn't been in every game since his first inclusion and nor is he a "recent upstart" as he was first introduced in Yoshi's Story under the name "Baby Bowser". Also, I think he's a really rubbish haracter TBH but each to his or her own.I have added a new Mario character. Who? Well, only the recent upstart who has been in every major Mario title since his first appearance. Bowser Junior was a secondary villain in New Super Mario Bros Wii, Mario Galaxy 1 and 2, as well as being the main villain throughout most of both Mario Sunshine and New Super Mario Bros DS. He was also playable in almost every spinoff game since then, including Mario Golf:Toadstool Tour, Mario Karts Double Dash and Wii, Mario Power Tennis, Super Sluggers and Superstar Baseball, Hoops 3-on-3, Strikers Charged, and Mario and Sonic @ the Olympic Winter Games.
I'm not adverse to K. Rool in any way other than the "he isn't Wiz Pig grumble grumble" one but Dixie Kong is little more than a Diddy clone, already exists as an alternate cotume in Brawl and was never really more than a bad Banjo replacement anyway.As for the next series with a new character, I'm thinking either one of the 2 biggest DK reps not already in-K. Rool or Dixie Kong.
No great ideas here.Zelda series.
Meta was more fun in SSE, otherwise, I don't know them.As for Metroid...Ridley, Ridley, Ridley, Ridley, Ridley, Ridley. That is all.
Yarn Kirby was suggested who may or may not be a better idea than PF but either way is fine.Nobody new needs to be added from Kirby, but if one is, it'd have to be Gooey or Prince Fluff, but only if they're relevant for the time.
Or even up team Starfox and team Starwolf by adding in the only other reccuring SW member, Leon, with Mewtwo-esque tail attacks and teleports mixed in with the SF series classics.As for Star Fox...KRYSTAL YOU GUYS, DUUUH.
There's nothing fun for them to do though. Phoenix as a high-tech Falcon, Pico with spanner throwing ability or Black Shadow are the only ones I can see working.I'm also thinking a new F-Zero character would be good, particularly a villain or a woman, especially one that's been there since the beginning-that is to say, either Goroh or Jody Summers. I'm really thinking Goroh though.
Pokemon suck but Mewtwo was a great smash character who needs to make a return and Meowth could actually work if done well. We don't need any total newcomers though, we have too many pokemon via PT and the pokeballs already.As for Pokemon, remove Lucario to make way for Zoroark, and add...well, characters have, in the past, represented 1st, 2nd, and 4th gens, Zoroark would represent 5th, and so I'd think they'd want to add a character to represent Gen 3. Obviously, that means Deoxys, Blaziekn or Gardevoir(Legendary Popular Pokemon, also able to represent the event-only pokemon, Starter Popular Pokemon, with a secondary Fighting Type, which would be good for a fighting game(Why didn't anybody think of this before?), and a...erm...pure, unbridled, fanbase.) Or they could just A:Keep Lucario, B:Add Meowth or C:Bring Back Mewtwo.
Mr. G&W was added for the shear lols of his comedy moveset as far as I can tell and while the retro aspect seems like another good reason, I don't think he was exactly out of nowhere. Rob, on the other hand, was an absolute nescessity for the story of SSE and so seems to have been added for that reason.Now, in both SSBM and SSBB, there has been a pattern regarding retro characters-one retro character that's there simply because he'd work interestingly/well as a character(Ice Climbers, Pit), and one that's smack out of nowhere, and more often than not, represents something(Mr. Game & Watch, ROB).
Yes to this.Basically saying more little references to Nintendo stuffs that
A) aren't dumped into galleries most people usually ignore,
B) aren't forced to fit the context of the gameplay (IE "non-fighting" content), and
C) are simple and subtle enough that they can be appreciated even by anyone unfamiliar with them.
He was in both New super Mario Bros Wii and Super Mario Galaxy 2. He is going to be a mainstay for a while.I hate to break it to you but Bowser Jr. hasn't been in every game since his first inclusion and nor is he a "recent upstart" as he was first introduced in Yoshi's Story under the name "Baby Bowser". Also, I think he's a really rubbish haracter TBH but each to his or her own.
Dixie was considered for brawl though. I really liked the tag team idea for the both diddy and dixie, but I am usually the only one. I think she has a shot, but only if DLC is avaliable.I'm not adverse to K. Rool in any way other than the "he isn't Wiz Pig grumble grumble" one but Dixie Kong is little more than a Diddy clone, already exists as an alternate cotume in Brawl and was never really more than a bad Banjo replacement anyway.
Tingle is the only real choice. (Sad, I know. but that is just the way it is.No great ideas here.
Kirby needs no new reps. Either Yarn Kirby will replace kirby, or he is just put as a sticker.Yarn Kirby was suggested who may or may not be a better idea than PF but either way is fine.
No. SF has to many reps. Keep what we have or replace someone.Or even up team Starfox and team Starwolf by adding in the only other reccuring SW member, Leon, with Mewtwo-esque tail attacks and teleports mixed in with the SF series classics.
DLC is perfect for those two characters.Pokemon suck but Mewtwo was a great smash character who needs to make a return and Meowth could actually work if done well. We don't need any total newcomers though, we have too many pokemon via PT and the pokeballs already.
I disagree unless people think Smash bros will have 4 3rd party characters. Then Namco should be represented and the list would beYes to this.
And Finally
@the idea of DLC: Lloyd or I'm not buying.
I'm very well aware of that. I was talking about design. Yes, character-wise, they are different, but Bowser Jr. is basically a recycled Baby Bowser. Their similarities in appearance is uncanny.Ugh...
Baby Bowser is Bowser as a baby.
Bowser Jr is his eighth child.
I hate having to repeat that.