I thought Layton wasn't a proper Nintendo character or something. Bah, I'm confused.
Level-5 owns him, so 3rd party. Nintendo does publish them outside of Japan though (or did rather, Level-5's handling it after the one that just came out).
Probably the most successful new third-party franchise for Nintendo since the NES era, and it's exclusive to boot, so there's that.
Thanks. While I don't consider your sales connections to be proper for popularity measurement, it's a hell of a lot more accurate than using messageboards.
To be fair, passionate fans (like with Mother and Fire Emblem) make for a pretty strong case. But yeah, as long as you're not thinking "this group represents everyone" or generalizing ("this is what girls like") then you're in relatively good shape.
I don't know anything about the Layton games, but I should get around to playing the new one when my birthday comes along. It's a mystery game, right? And do you remember the Layton Twitter from a while back?
By the way, are these games connected via a plot like the Phoenix Wright games or are they stand alone?
They're standalone in that you can play each one and understand it, but you'll definitely enjoy them a lot more if you play them in order.
I haven't played Phoenix Wright, but they have dialogue trees in that, right? Layton doesn't. Gameplay is all exploring, talking to people/checking objects, solving puzzles, and playing some mini-games. Good chunk of time in dialogue and movies. I'm pretty sure you'd like it for the same reasons as Mother though.
And yeah I remember the Twitter thing, fake though so meh.
@edit 1 for CB: Prominence in series and appeal (whether people will dig this character if they've never heard of them; pretty key when Smash is way more popular than most series it showcases). Also not sure why your response to criticism over your myopia defaults to "haters gonna hate," but whatever.
@edit 2 for Panera Bread: if you don't care about spoilers, gimme a few minutes to find some YouTube clips