DekuBoy
Smash Lord
Why the Dickens would you not want Starfy playable?
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
herm... i forbid myself from answering that question to the fullest as there are factors that are deemed opinions as well as the opinions of others in play on my decision for his non playability. sorry. (i also fear the starfy fans)
if he gets in, then... cool! but otherwise in my book he ain't viable.
you don't have to read this but:
not really a spoiler but ... for people who don't want to read nonsense. (in their opinion)(my book is completely different from everyone else's book considering that i use other peoples thoughts for me as well as my own mixed to a final decision, oh and the fact that others say the same thing and i take them into account, does not mean that i agree but i still have what they said and possibly use it against others)(you know what, this is probably why i am so confusing to understand, its like a schitzo trying to talk at once)
Meowth could be unique enough. I don't know much about the DK series characters to really comment on them (though haven't I read a proposed tag team with Dixie and Diddy?). Tingle would be way better than a baloon fighter. Golden Sun hasn't been done yet so that would be good. I don't know much about Starfy, but he looks kinda boring...........I am all for bringing in fresh blood. I support Toad in addition to Dixie Kong, King K. Rool, Meowth, Mewtwo, a new Pokemon (either Zoroark or someone newer, just don't be similar to Mewtwo and Lucario), Tingle (he is way more interesting and has more potential than the Balloon Fighter), the new protagonist from Golden Sun DS (I know he will be exactly like Isaac and Felix in that game anyway), a new Fire Emblem lord who is not a clone of Marth or Ike (and is not Roy, Lyn, and Micaiah), Starfy, Takamaru, Little Mac, Duck Hunt Dog (for the lulz like Mr. Game & Watch and R.O.B.), Mega Man, and a protagonist from Nintendo's new international and successful franchise (maybe The Last Story). So, do you see any potential clones from this wish list?
I agree about Starfy right there. I understand why he wasn't playable in Brawl - he was Japan-only and a new franchise. At least Lucas was a Japan-only character in an international (although mostly Japan-only) franchise and is a clone of Ness.Okay..... But from what I've seen the vast majority of people would like him playable. He has his own series which was successful in Japan and the US. I count all these things as important factors.
On the subject of Toad, I beleive that his moveset should consist of NSMBWii moves, SMB2 moves and Mario spinoff abilities.
Yeah, Meowth could be very unique. He would have scratches (he is known as the Scratch Cat Pokemon) so he could have fast but weak moves and he could use different versions of Pay Day for his specials. For example, the Pay Day from the Pokemon games (where Meowth throws a coin) could be his B move and the Pay Day from the original Smash could be his counter attack move (it could be called Payback from the Pokemon games and it is down+B) and his Final Smash would be the Pay Day from Brawl (just call it Super Pay Day and call it a day ). Meowth's side+B would have to be Fury Swipes where Meowth repeatedly scratches in a similar manner to Marth's side+B move and his up+B would be Faint Attack.Meowth could be unique enough. I don't know much about the DK series characters to really comment on them (though haven't I read a proposed tag team with Dixie and Diddy?). Tingle would be way better than a baloon fighter. Golden Sun hasn't been done yet so that would be good. I don't know much about Starfy, but he looks kinda boring.
I think I've made my stance clear on Little Mac before.............he might be unique, albeit a little boring of a character (I think they'd have to take a few liberties with his moveset). I think Duck Hunt dog would be a cool assist trophy. If he was playable he would be too silly; I'd rather the spot on the roster be filled with someone worthy of recognition.
Mega Man could be a little "clone-y " if they don't watch it, but he should be easy enough to make fresh moves for, time permitting of course.
Your list runs little to no risk, imo, of having too many clones.
Oh, I do want more franchises represented in SSB4. But I also want a few characters from existing franchises. Toad, Meowth, Mewtwo, a new Pokemon from Black/White, Dixie Kong, King K. Rool, and a new Fire Emblem lord for the existing franchises. Tingle, Starfy, Takamaru, Little Mac, Duck Hunt Dog, Mega Man, the protagonist from Golden Sun DS, and a protagonist from a new Nintendo franchise (maybe The Last Story if it is successful) for the brand new franchises.Eh, whenever I think of new blood, I usually think of new series rather than third stringers from established ones. Thus I feel the that the focus should be on bringing in loads of newer series, rather than trying to milk the last drops out of older ones. The only characters from pre-established series that I think should get in are the ones who are really worth it, rather than just the next in line or something dumb like that.
EDIT: And I think I get what Arc misread about my post. Its not a matter of Toad not using moves that others can use, but rather the fact that as Toad only uses moves that others have used, that he could be a clone. If you didn't notice Arc, I edited my post earlier to respond to it.
Comments in BoldLet me write a list of characters that i would never have playable (not to be confused with "i would never play as")
My Forbidden:
Toad- Meh I care Not
Starfy- I'd prefer just about anyone over him, but am ok with it if he's in
Duck Hunt DogI'm with Arcade, this'd be awesome
Balloon FighterMost Wanted Retro, and in my most wanted top 5
Dixie Kong Another very wanted character, with Diddy of course
Funky Kong- Nah, pretty lame
Excite Bike Another wanted Retro, it'd be pretty awesome
Wolf Link/w Midna-Agreed, Worst characters suggestion ever in all of Smash history
MeowthMeh why not
Waluigi (almost forgot him)I'm cool with Walski
any anime character (unless nintendo owned, but alas)I could dig some anime characters (Let's go Yuske)
Edit: MiiLameity Lame
Galacta KnightAwful
Link/w MasksBest suggestion short of Old Young Link returning. Majora Link would be ana mazing character that I really would love to see
Louie Meh, it'd be cool
Ryu Hayabusa If that's the Ninja Gaiden, then yes.
GooeyI like Gooey
Chibi-Robo Be ool for laughs
On the Brink:
(my unknown status for--)Tingle (this means i cannot decide between a few major factors)-Nah, unless he's a summoner like Toise said...
(my unknown status for--)ZoroarkToo early to tell
(my unknown status for--)Toon ZeldaYes
(my unknown status for--)RidleyDon't care either way
(my unknown status for--)Simon Belmont (because i would rather want to get Alucard but the factors...)Sure, let's go Simon
(my unknown status for--)GenoNO!
Edit: (my unknown status for--)Tom NookNot a fighter, out.
(my unknown status for--)Knuckle Joe (not saying i would, but still) No.
(my unknown status for--)Kamek (im thinking he could work like roll from TvC, WHAT? could.)No
(my unknown status for--)Darkrai No, no legendaries outside Mewtwo
(my unknown status for--)Bowser Jr./w Shadow Mario If's he's got shadow MArio then Sure, without it's Meh for me
The LCD stick figure makes sense because G&W games are iconic. But I would be ok with DHD replacing ROB. I would've been happier with any character over ROB.Nothing is too silly to be playable in Smash. This is Nintendo we are talking about. We got a LCD stick figure and a NES peripheral as playable characters. The Duck Hunt Dog would be epic. Siccing ducks at the opponents and pointing at the opponents so the hunter (the Duck Hunt player) can shoot at the opponents and flying away with the ducks and throwing clay pigeons (white frisbees from the Clay Shooting mode)..........
Meowth is mushing it too much in terms of milking the series too much. I'd also say that Mewtwo, DIxie, and K.Rool would be too, but to lesser degrees. A new FE lord or Pokemon has the pottential to be popular enough to warent a spot beyond milking the franchise dry, and Tingle has his own game series at this point. Everyone else you mentioned would simply be part of a new series, and thus okay by my book. (Well besides Duck Hunt Dog, because that's just silly) The more obscure yet recent games are actually prime games to get into Smash, because while the characters are not well known, they get attention from Smash, and thus something like what happened with Fire Emblem could happen again. In addition, I'd also have to point out that the term retro should be bumped up a gen or two to at least include the SNES, if not the N64 as well.Oh, I do want more franchises represented in SSB4. But I also want a few characters from existing franchises. Toad, Meowth, Mewtwo, a new Pokemon from Black/White, Dixie Kong, King K. Rool, and a new Fire Emblem lord for the existing franchises. Tingle, Starfy, Takamaru, Little Mac, Duck Hunt Dog, Mega Man, the protagonist from Golden Sun DS, and a protagonist from a new Nintendo franchise (maybe The Last Story if it is successful) for the brand new franchises.
There aren't many noteworthy new franchises and most of them are rather obscure or not that successful. I mean, Drill Dozer, Fossil Fighters, Chibi-Robo, Custom Robo, Sin & Punishment, Captain Rainbow, etc.? At least the retro characters have the excuse of being obscure because that's the point of being retro.
Huh? Sakurai has basically said that if Nintendo asked him to make another Smash Brothers he would seriously consider it.No offense implied, but if you were to want to be taken seriously, perhaps you shouldn't be posting ideas for a game that, first of all, has been hinted by Sakurai to not be happening and probably won't ever exist
I think I've gone down this road a thousand times or so by now.Me loves Captain Rainbow.
But do you really consider K.Rool to be milking the series? He's an iconic villain and important to his series. Dixie was just another sidekick and I think Diddy has that role covered.
I think a lot of people (me included) love K.Rool so I guess he's like Marmite. Either love it or hate it.I think I've gone down this road a thousand times or so by now.
In my opinion, K.Rool really can't be called iconic. He's simply the generic cookie cutter villain developed for the Donkey Kong Country series. There's nothing about him that honestly stands out from any other villain like this, and his popularity is dervived almost completely from his position in the series. (And don't even get me started on how the DK series really doesn't need another character) Thus I feel that adding him in would just be milking the series to try to get a villain out of it rather than a character. Quite frankly, the DK series is already somewhat covered in terms of having a villain (lol Mario) so there isn't any "need" for that, and even if Mario didn't count, it I must stress again that the Smash series isn't about bringing in old match up or "classic fights" or any of that BS, but rather about crossover fights between Nintendo's iconic mascots. At the very least Dixie Kong was given her own game, and could have been a unique character with Diddy, but then again, I wouldn't really think she's all that deserving either.
What makes you say that? The fact that Mewtwo and Plusle/Minun were planned shows that at one stage they were prepared to give Pokemon six slots in Brawl, so we shouldn't make any assumptions about how many it'll get in the next game.The thing is Pokemon will probably get 5 open spots
I'm pretty sure Meowth was considered for SSB64.@KM: Meowth wasn't considered for SSB 64. Mewtwo was, but not Meowth.
Its been rumored yes, but that's it. Rumors. I guess I shouldn't have said "considered" or anything like that, but what I really meant to say was that Meowth wasn't programmed in as far as anyone knows. Like the 7 unplayable characters that had data in Brawl, there was a similar situation in Smash 64, where Mewtwo, Bowser, and King Dedede had data. Pit, Peach, and Meowth are just rumors, and there is nothing out there that really signifies if they would have been considered or not. (Its on the Smash wiki though because...well that's a wiki. Anyone can edit that thing. There's no real source for it either, and there are other pages where Smash 64 pottential characters are listed, but Meowth isn't on the lists)I'm pretty sure Meowth was considered for SSB64.
SmashWiki sez:
"Meowth was one of several characters considered during development to be playable in the original Super Smash Bros., but ultimately cut from the original roster due to time constraints. Meowth shares this distinction with Bowser, Pit, King Dedede, Mewtwo, and Peach. Of all these characters, Meowth is the only one to have remained unplayable thus far. "
Backing this up, Sakurai's page for 64 also outright mentions having planned Bowser, Mewtwo and Dedede. If the other three were planned as well, he probably would've mentioned them.Its been rumored yes, but that's it. Rumors. I guess I shouldn't have said "considered" or anything like that, but what I really meant to say was that Meowth wasn't programmed in as far as anyone knows. Like the 7 unplayable characters that had data in Brawl, there was a similar situation in Smash 64, where Mewtwo, Bowser, and King Dedede had data. Pit, Peach, and Meowth are just rumors, and there is nothing out there that really signifies if they would have been considered or not. (Its on the Smash wiki though because...well that's a wiki. Anyone can edit that thing. There's no real source for it either, and there are other pages where Smash 64 pottential characters are listed, but Meowth isn't on the lists)
I hope Meowth will be playable but there are some people who want to keep Meowth out of the roster because they fear he will take away the spot from Jigglypuff or Mewtwo or any new Pokemon from Black/White and because they think Meowth have no moves and because they think the addition of Meowth would be over-repping the first generation and thus a Pokemon from different generations should be added for the sake of having different Pokemon from different generations (this reason is very similar to adding females/villains for the sake of having females/villains).
I never said anything about a sword. All I want to see is a unique moveset. Even if Sakurai didn't want to give him a weapon, there's still no excuse for him being a Falcon clone.Oh, and I am not too interested about Ganondorf getting a sword. He never used it in Ocarina of Time, let alone own one (I know, I played it last night). It is no wonder why Sakurai turned him into a Captain Falcon clone. They should just add a magical projectile from OOT to his Warlock Punch to make him a bit more different from Captain Falcon.
Well Toad is still nowhere near the level of Mario, Luigi, Peach and Bowser, and I personally don't think he's worth a playable spot anyway.For the Mario series, you got Bowser Jr. and Toad. Either one is a possibility (it would be nice to get both) and I am rooting for Toad (in case we don't get both and mainly because I see Bowser Jr. as a potential clone). I don't think Bowser Jr. and Toad could be considered fringe characters because they have strong ties to the main Mario canon as they consistently have story-related roles on a recurring basis. Fringe characters would be Dr. Mario (and we all know he was added as a filler clone), Waluigi, Daisy, and especially Geno.
What?and Ganondorf is starting to lose importance in the Zelda series
Ganondorf only had three games. OOT, TWW, and TP. Also, I belive that in TP he was originally planned to NOT be in the game but was added in the last minute to please the OOT fans and then he got killed again. So now we have two dead Ganondorfs in both timelines. What if the new Zelda game with the new fairy-sword-spirit-girl character doesn't feature Ganondorf? I am not saying Ganondorf should be removed because of that, I am merely stating that Ganondorf is starting to lose importance in the Zelda series.Just digging up a post I missed from a few pages back:
What?
How do you work that one out? Ganondorf is just as important to the Zelda series now as he ever was. The only games he tends not to feature in are handheld instalments.
They don't necessarily have to be of vital importance, but "Toad" isn't even treated as a character in his own right. It's just a generic Mushroom Kingdom race.@ Serph
No one is saying Toad is near the level of Mario, Luigi, Peach, and Bowser. It seems as if you think that if a character is added, that means that character is very important in their franchise and is just as important as the main character/mascot of said franchise.
Ganondorf is Ganon, and together they've featured in every console Zelda with the exception of one. Even if you want to treat them as separate characters, why would you say he's "only" appeared in three games? That's 3/4 console outings since his debut...Ganondorf only had three games. OOT, TWW, and TP. Also, I belive that in TP he was originally planned to NOT be in the game but was added in the last minute to please the OOT fans and then he got killed again. So now we have two dead Ganondorfs in both timelines. What if the new Zelda game with the new fairy-sword-spirit-girl character doesn't feature Ganondorf? I am not saying Ganondorf should be removed because of that, I am merely stating that Ganondorf is starting to lose importance in the Zelda series.
If only Ephraim from FE:SS had been received better...@Panera Bread: I don't know your stance on Ganon, but I was recently reminded of how awesome Phantom Ganon in OoT looked with a lance. He should use those more often. Actually everyone should use lances more often.