The only qualm i have with your list is Waluigi over Bowser Junior (I still hate BJ) as your reason didn't make much sense. Waluigi has many people who hate him, probably more than BJ. Though I would prefer Waluigi myself, and he never made a truly impactual canonical appearence while BJ did in at least one game.
People are annoyed by Bowser Jr. Most people see him as an annoyance that is just there. Save for a few younger Mario fans (who don't know about the Koppa Kids and started when he was around), most people dislike him. This is why New Super Mario Bros. Wii is going to use the Koppa Kids despite the DS game using Bowser Jr.
People are different towards Waluigi. They want to see him become more of a full fledged character. Talk about Waluigi, and someone will mention how he needs his own game or he needs to be in a main Mario game. People want to see him become more then an extra character for the party games. This shows that are actually interested in Waluigi.
MY problem with smashchu is that
1. Waluigi AND Geno over Paper Mario and BJ
2. Fire Emblem is just killing me when I look at your list, Why should we have 4 swords for FE?
What?
1)I already mentioned how Bowser Jr. is just there to annoy fans. Paper Mario is a different story.
Zelda fans can get behind Toon Link because they know they are different Links. This is an identity of the Legend of Zelda games. Mario fans don't see this in the same way. Paper Mario is just Mario and Mario fans agree that is the case. This is why Paper Mario has never been a big request. The only place I heard it consistently was Nsider. Most fans see Paper Mario as Mario and fell like "They are just adding Marios. What next? Referrer Mario?" Fans of Dr. Mario would also get upset as they didn't add Dr. Mario back (whom is already part of the Smash Bros identity). Sakurai would be more likely to add Dr. Mario back then Paper Mario.
2)I hate when people say "Too many swords from Fire Emblem. Let's add a magic caster." Truth is, no one wants a magic caster or lance user. I added Lyn because people legitimately want her. If you really want a character who doesn't use a sword, Hector is your best best.
I hate when people mention this because they then proceed to mention characters that no one wants. Sakurai said he would add characters that made people want to play the game. A magic user isn't going to appeal to anyone besides the few die hard fans that demands it exist. P;ayers don't care about that. They want to see characters that interest them. Hector could work as people liked Hector. But Lyn is the one fans want to see.
I always assumed he was reiterating the fact that you can't play as them; I remember lots of people had to be reminded anytime a new one was shown.
Anyway, while that might be the case for a few characters (Goroh, Mac, Isaac definitely), it doesn't necessarily mean all of them were destined for greater things.
The reason I think we'll see more and more AT characters in Smash is more then a point or two.
1)AT characters are ones people actually want to play as. On Saki's page:
"He rivals just about any main character. There were many requests from users for his inclusion, and he IS pretty cool, so I did what I could to include him. After all, this game does let you enjoy a dream cast of supporting characters!"
Sakurai dirrectly mentions that people wanted Saki. Waluigi's page also mentions something to the extent.
The fact that he’s an Assist Trophy means he won’t be appearing as a playable character, but...
Waluigi appears nonetheless!
This one implies that people wanted to see him in the game, more then what was expect. If you look at other characters, you'll see the same thing. Lyn was a very popular Fire Emblem character in the west. Issac is a character a lot of people wanted. Kat and Ana are fan favorites from Warioware ect ect. Little Mac may be the only one who is wanted after the AT, and not as a result of it. Little Mac became in demand when Punch Out came out on the Wii.
2)The become part of the Smash Bros world. Most people think Smash is just a mixup of Nintendo stuff. I disagree. I think Smash is its own world in the player's mind, just that the content of the world is Nintendo. Take Roy and Mewtwo. A lot of people though that it was for the better they were gone. Roy was "just an advertisement anyway," and "Ike was pretty much just Roy." But fans of Roy did not care. They just wanted Roy back. A lot of the quotes have validity. If Smash bros just a mixup of Nintendo, then Roy would not have been missed, but since he is, I think that shows that Smash has its own identity. I beleive the Assist Trophies are now seen as part of that world. It would not be surprising if fans would like to see those characters move up.
3)Non-fans will see the ATs over all other characters. The trophies did this too. Let's say your not a Mother/Earthbound fan. You would think that, after playing Brawl, that Jeff must have been very important. He must be, he comes and helps Ness and Lucas. People will identify more with the ATs over other characters from the same series (this is why I think we'll see Jeff before Claus). Note that even though someone may not be an Mother/Earthbound fan, their voice still counts when it comes time to add characters. People would sooner attach to Jeff before other characters. It's much in the way people saw Roy as Marth's partner.
4)The ATs could already be added as characters. The ATs in the game could already become characters on their own. Sakurai mentioned how Saki could fit right in. I assume Sakurai and others know that a lot of the AT characters are ones that if they were added to the game, would be ones people would like. I know a lot of people who knew nothing of Saki would like to play as him.
5)Hacker may make ATs before other characters. We are getting closer to being able to make characters for Smash Bros. One of the hardest things is adding stuff into Smash Bros. Right now, clones are possible. I believe the next step is going to make ATs characters. I suspect someone at Nintendo will catch on to this.........
There may be more points. These were the major ones I remembered. As you can see, ATs are more definable then other characters.
On Waluigi real quick (and the Mario series by proxy), I'm pretty sure he's the same as Daisy. I can't find the exact quote, but I recall Sakurai saying something to the effect of: "Daisy, from the Game Boy game, right? Oh, but she doesn't make appearances like that anymore, does she?" Gave me the impression that he's only interested in Mario characters that keep showing up in the main games (IE Toad and Jr.).
The Mario series is the hardest to define because it is so broad. There is no way to know what Sakurai would do with it.
I've been looking for that quote for a while, lemme know if you remember it.[/QUOTE]
As for the quote, I can't find it. I'll look on the Dojo, but otherwise, I'm know nothing about it.
I'm going to point out a few things I take issue with in your post, Chu. Not arguing, just hoping you can clear up some stuff for me.
I guess you could call these counter arguments, but I'll try to explain the concerns.
Unhappy? I would think they would be elated if such a thing happened (which probably won't, but still). You think of it as being overfed, I see it as dessert. Just a minor gripe of mine, so ignore this.
The reason is that people would see the addition as unimportaint and be one that could have been filled by a better character. Basically, if they add Knuckle Joe without anything interesting, people will either not care at all (which is bad in entertainment) or they will feel cheated. Note how Smash almost always goes for the most important characters. If they ever don't, they will cover it up by being a revolutionary character. So Knuckle Joe would make people unhappy at a "lame" addition, but if he may be merged with other helpers for a new character, then people would love it.
Note that people dislike character additions when there is an alternative they see as better. To use an example, people were very displeased about the Rabbids in TMNT Smash Up. But, it was obvious the Rabbids weren't the problem. The problem was they didn't add Rockstedy and Bebop. The alternative to the Rabbids was Rockstedy and Bebop. So, players will get mad based on who the alternative to Knuckle Joe is. There is a lot more too it, but this is a basic understanding.
If that's the case, can you explain why Pichu was included in Melee?
(for the viewers at home, here is the quote he is talking about
Characters who are added must be important. Bill from Star Fox may be cool, but he isn't the important is he?)
Pichu was important enough to add. It was not unreasonable to add the character. The reason people disliked him was he was a joke character (unlike Street Fighter, Smash fans hate joke characters) and many thought he was useless and thus seen as a waste of space. There are still a lot of people who want to see him become a viable character.
Many people also genuinely like Bowser Jr., perhaps more so than Waluigi. You mentioned characters who are added must be important, yet listed Waluigi instead of Jr. I dunno about that.
It's not that the character is important, but that the character is relevant. Geno is less important then other characters, but the player still finds the character important.
As far as Bowser Jr. and Waluigi goes, here is what I wrote earlier.
People are annoyed by Bowser Jr. Most people see him as an annoyance that is just there. Save for a few younger Mario fans (who don't know about the Koppa Kids and started when he was around), most people dislike him. This is why New Super Mario Bros. Wii is going to use the Koppa Kids despite the DS game using Bowser Jr.
People are different towards Waluigi. They want to see him become more of a full fledged character. Talk about Waluigi, and someone will mention how he needs his own game or he needs to be in a main Mario game. People want to see him become more then an extra character for the party games. This shows that are actually interested in Waluigi.
I don't think people have the see them as important off-the-bat for them to be included. They do have their fair share of importance, even if people don't see it immediately. Again, minor gripe of mine. (I support them, so yeah).
I assume your talking about the Babies? If so, remember that the goal is to add characters people want to play as. If players don't find them important (which is character relevancy), then they will not like the addition.
Jeff > Claus specifically bothers me. You mentioned before in a different post how you have a thing for Jeff, and I don't know whether or not that played a part in you deciding Jeff > Claus. From what I'm seeing here and elsewhere, it's always Claus [Masked Man] > Jeff.
Fans of Mother/Earthbound, who know more about the series, would put Masked Man first. Everyone else would but Jeff first because
- He's an Assist
- People know Earthbound better then Mother
- He's already popular on his own
Its really that non-Mother fans would define its place in Smash more then fans of the series. This is because Mother/Earthbound is tied greatly to Smash (its what made people know it existed). Jeff would probably be more liked to a lot more people then Masked Man.
Another minor gripe. I'll say it now that Ninten (re-designed, of course) will be the final Mother character. Mark this post.
*Marks*
(aside:I would like to see Ninten. It's just he looks so similar to Ness)
Yes, it's logical that those would be the characters added, but silly to think Kat & Ana outshines Mona and Jimmy T. Maybe you think so because they were ATs in SSBB, but I personally don't see it that way.
Kat and Ana outshine them because they are fan favorites. Kat and Ana moved up in the series because fans liked them (I mentioned this in the post). I beleive they are ATs because people liked them.
Also, what say you about Syrup possibly becoming a boss in adventure mode? I don't see her as a viable playable character either, but she'd make one heck of a boss, I would think.
The only problem with bosses is they are huge. Syrup isn't. She really needs a trophy at least. She could make a cool AT too.
I've been thinking about this last night. Thought it was silly at first, but then, I guess you can say a light bulb lit in my head, so to speak.
I'm thinking about the fighting teams. From Polygons, to Wire Frames, and now Alloys, you can see how they're evolving and becoming more individual with each installment. They will undoubtedly change in SSB4 (Calling it, they'll be named
'Mischmetal'), so perhaps one can have it's own moveset and become it's own fighter.
Glad I made an impact
The question is going to be will Smash fans except a Smash character. Smash has its own world in the player's mind, but the world is still a mash up of Nintendo content. It may be a big risk to add a Smash character. It will either come down to
- Fans see it as part of the world and like it
- Fans don't mind it's not directly Nintendo content and like it (perhaps in the same way as Sonic and Snake)
- Fans dislike it because it is outside the Nintendo realm (the source of the game's content)