PeachRose
Smash Cadet
And...although he probably won't make it in, I'd love to see Bomberman. He'd be great.
I totally agree! I loved Bomberman 64. Ahh the memories.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
And...although he probably won't make it in, I'd love to see Bomberman. He'd be great.
When you say Leon, who exactly are you talking about?Please stay on topic.
I don't think SSB4 will add any Megaman characters.
Here is my list:
Krystal
K.K. Rool
Perhaps Leon..
Maybe Waluigi
When you say Leon, who exactly are you talking about?
Also, its K.Rool, not K.K.
>_________________>smashmanx7 said:i dont think krystal is popular to be in brawl4 but she will be in it brawl needs more female characters anyway also bomberman i great idea
I feel you>_________________>
Leon's would basically be guarenteed to be a rip-off of Fox/Falco/Wolf as he has nothing to work with. Krystal at least has some material from Star Fox Adventures to work with so, unless the developers get freakishly lazy, Krystal would at least have something to set her apart from the other Star Fox characters.i hope krystal is not a fox copy like wolf and falco and about leon i wonder how his move set would be
Which they did for two games now...Fatmanonice said:unless the developers get freakishly lazy
Meh, the only person I say they were lazy with was Ganondorf and that's about it. Everyone else isn't that bad considering what they all had to work with.Which they did for two games now...
don't get me started on how lazy they were with ganon, they have a zillion moves to pull from the zelda series, yet he's just a captain falcon clone still.Meh, the only person I say they were lazy with was Ganondorf and that's about it. Everyone else isn't that bad considering what they all had to work with.
Now, when you say "orchestrated" do you mean done with real instruments or arranged by professionals? Only a few pieces in Brawl were done with real instruments (ie; not MIDI) while all of them were arranged by professional video game composers.I'm more into orchestrated music, most of the music in SSBB were, and I loved everyone of em.
Does that include the ones (that were recommended several times) in the poll (http://www.smashboards.com/showthread.php?t=71872) that was made after Brawl's roster was chosen?And the game does not absolutely NEED female characters. That is just a stupid excuse used by poeple supporting an unlikely female character. Same with the "NEEDZ MOER VILLUNZ!!1!one!1!" argument. Whoever deserves to be in should be in, and whoever seems likely at the moment. If it is an unpopular, insignificant, useless female character, she probably won't get in just because she's a female.
The official Super Smash Bros. Brawl website has a list of all the composers, in case you're interested.Oh were they composed by pro video game composers? @_@ Well I still love the music xD
Roy's popular mostly because of his visual appeal (meaning his fans want a red-haired swordsman, not necessarily Roy). I heard that Sakurai wouldn't really want him added to SSB4. Ask Pieman about it. Micaiah would be a better choice because she's a female, a mage, far less likely to be a clone, and though she doesn't have as big a fanbase as Roy's, she's not overrated. We don't need Roy playable. And if his chances are higher than Micaiah's because of Roy's Melee playability, we would have gotten Roy instead of Ike playable in Brawl, and Ike would not have been playable in that game.u know wat i never understood why roy was tooken out and replaced with ike they KINDA have the same the moveset a slash here and a fire stab there
Making Ridley playable is hardly anything like making Master Hand playable.Very well written! I lol'd at Yoshi XD
Isaac would be an awesome addition! I don't think Ridley will be a playable character. He already has the act of a boss. It would be like adding the Master Hand as a playable character. I do prefer Krystal over Wolf. If an Animal Crosser were to be a playable character, I would LOVE to his/her moveset XD ( Throw piece of furniture with B! ). And adding Megaman in is highly likely. That's all I have for now!
Really, I haven't heard anything about this. Also, like Mewtwo, he was cut from Brawl, but were more than likely in some playable state. Therefore, I think we'll see those two next game.I heard that Sakurai wouldn't really want him added to SSB4.
I don't know if F-Zero should get a second rep.I think that you should have put Samurai Goroh, as his appearance as an AT in Brawl may have raised his chances to become a playable character.
Also, I don't mind seeing both Wolf and Krystal in.
It's doubtful, but either Mona or Captain Syrup could end up as a rep for the Wario series.
Somehow, I don't think that Animal Crosser will become playable.
That's just about all that I can think of, from the top of my head.
Roy is a poor choice for a third FE rep. Micaiah would be a much better candidate; popularity doesn't decide everything, you know.Really, I haven't heard anything about this. Also, like Mewtwo, he was cut from Brawl, but were more than likely in some playable state. Therefore, I think we'll see those two next game.
Making Ridley playable is hardly anything like making Master Hand playable.
Can we please not start a Ridley argument?
Well, so much for that Wario Vs. Syrup match-up. She would need a beating for what she did to Wario in "Wario Land: Shake it!".We don't need Mona or Captain Syrup.
That's not what Sakurai thinks, though.I think the AC is likely.
We could always make C. Syrup a selectable Sandbag version.Well, so much for that Wario Vs. Syrup match-up. She would need a beating for what she did to Wario in "Wario Land: Shake it!"
People want a red-haired swordsman, not necesarily Roy? There's no basis for thinking that, and the fact is that Roy's pretty much the only red-haired swordsman, and it shouldn't matter why people support a character as long as they are supporting them anyway. You heard Sakurai wouldn't want me added... you're sourcelessMario the Jumpman said:Roy's popular mostly because of his visual appeal (meaning his fans want a red-haired swordsman, not necessarily Roy). I heard that Sakurai wouldn't really want him added to SSB4. Ask Pieman about it. Micaiah would be a better choice because she's a female, a mage, far less likely to be a clone, and though she doesn't have as big a fanbase as Roy's, she's not overrated. We don't need Roy playable. And if his chances are higher than Micaiah's because of Roy's Melee playability, we would have gotten Roy instead of Ike playable in Brawl, and Ike would not have been playable in that game.
...We could always make C. Syrup a selectable Sandbag version.
Some of the things I said about Roy I've heard from Pieman (I told you to ask him about it. Maybe he can tell you about it next time he's online...).People want a red-haired swordsman, not necesarily Roy? There's no basis for thinking that, and the fact is that Roy's pretty much the only red-haired swordsman, and it shouldn't matter why people support a character as long as they are supporting them anyway. You heard Sakurai wouldn't want me added... you're sourcelessand the fact that Sakurai chose Roy as the Fire Emblem clone over all of the other Fire Emblem characters (who, quite frankly, could all be clones). Micaiah being a female means absolutely nothing about her chances. Your moveset potential points mean little- Toon Link, a character with lots of potential for his own moveset, was the closest thing to a clone in Brawl- and Roy could very easily be decloned. In fact, he may appeal to Sakurai more for his easy moveset anyway. The overrated thing is bias, plain and simple, and whether a character is overrated means nothing about their potential. I never claimed that Melee playability made Roy more likely than Ike for Brawl, but it gives him an edge.again
Your roster...
-Peach... is still cut... >_>
-Fawful is VERY unlikely compared to Bowser Jr. and Paper Mario.
-A fifth gen is very likely and if so a Pokemon from that gen will get in.
-No new F-Zero character?
-Even if you think that Micaiah is more likely than Roy, at least admit the high probability of a new role to trounce them both.
-A character from S&P, which has two games, is unlikely besides the many unrepped series with more.
-Takamaru's pretty unlikely. He has nothing to set him apart from the mound of obscure NES characters.
-If we get a AC rep it would be Tom Nook, not the generic Crosser, and Sakurai probably won't add one anyway since he considers AC characters to not be fighters.
Why can't you tell me them yourself?Mario the Jumpman said:Some of the things I said about Roy I've heard from Pieman (I told you to ask him about it).
The VERY EARLIEST we can expect SSB4 to be made is 2012. In fact, maybe 2015 is more reasonable, because Sakurai is working on Project Sora. That gives 3-6 years for a new Fire Emblem with a new lord (I believe all arcs are complete for this to happen) and a new generation (given that there's 3-4 years between gens, this is reasonable). It may seem unreasonable to expect but it really isn't.A new FE lord isn't guarenteed and doesn't even exist yet. Same for fifth gen Pokemon.
WTF characters are always very retro, very obscure characters. Fawful is neither.Fawful could make a great WTF character.
Yes you should.Maybe I should remove Takamaru...
Even if she's the better choice... is she the more likely choice? Sure, I'll stop the discussion.And Micaiah is still a better choice than Roy. Now can we please end this Micaiah v.s. Roy discussion?