Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Honestly, I havent kept up to date with Fire Emblem. But it is unlikely that Ike will be kept if he doesnt reemerge. Remember Young Link? Mewtwo? Dr. Mario? They didn't have any new games between Melee and brawl, with the exception of Mewtwo. (But even then, that was a remake.)
Marth is integral to the series, as he's the posterchild for the first game(s), and the original lord.
Awww...KirbyWorshipper2565 said:
Okay, I stand corrected. I remember him saying that, too.SmashChu said:
It's "G-ZERO" in Command. Also there's a racer in most F-ZERO games named "James McCloud", whose machine is named "The Great Fox".SkylerOcon said:
He was important in one game. He was a tiny miniquest in Ocarina, and a bit obstacle in TP.majora 787 said:
This would be neat, but like other people said, 28% is way too much for a move with basically no lag.kainsword said:
Think nothing of it.Shadowmaster9000 said:
More like all the time, really.
It depends on what they do with the transformation.darkserenade said:
I think Fire Wolf is an awesome move, and works great as is (though the name is a bit misleading...). Also Reflect Waves sounds horribly, horribly broken.Illusive said:
I'd actually assume Krystal's reflector would be the energy shield you can make in StarFox Adventures by holding in the R button--a wave of blue light extends from the tip of the staff to drape over Fox (or in this case, Krystal).kainsword said:
Ganondorf won't use a sword!
No, it's real. Squeenix is making it now, and it's planned for a Q2 2009 release.mantlecore77 said:
I know about Marth, don't need to tell me about it. I pretty much know of Fire Emblem, including it's Japan Titles (currently playing FE4, next is FE3).
Can you explain what you mean by that? I'm not saying you're wrong, I just want a clarification.
hold the shield button through to the stage selection screen...
um...... i honestly don't understand how people want sega characters, when sega for the past few years has been the absolute worst of the big game developers.
, square helped the SNES achieve greatness, with FF1-6 (FF6 is often argued to be the best RPG of all time), and now supports nintendo with various FF spinoffs (crystal chronicles and tactics advance), as well as with the ever-popular kingdom hearts series... and a couple other games here and there (dragon quest i think, mario hoops, smrpg, the world ends with you....). the games they are pretty easy to represent with a moogle, which is makes an appearance in almost every single game developed by square, starting with one of the early final fantasy games.was it a nintendo/sega collaboration that created sonic? was it kojima and miyamoto collaborating to create snake? also, geno was only in ONE game. not a very good representative of an entire company.
pretty sure that's a total myth. yeah, LOL! mario doesn't even have the M on his hat, and sora is taken straight from KH2, and the title is not at all of the style that the KH developers like to use (e.g. chain of memories, birth by sleep, coded, world ends with you, 358/2 days) however, i believe kingdom hearts 358/2 days is coming for the ds fairly soon (however, sora is not the main character. it focuses on roxas and organization XIII)Speaking of a Enix/Nintendo team up...
Will someone confirm to me if this:
Is a total myth?
I don't know what your trying to get at.
I LOVE Final Fantasy VI. I even own the original Final Fantasy III version of it. I've played it, and numerous other Final Fantasy games, to know the significant and popular roles that Moogles fill in.anyway
No, it was not. And yes, Geno was only in one game. But I did not intend to bring up a Geno debate, that debate will go on forever and is pointless to me.
Yeah I thought it was a myth... I just had to make sure before my hopes got the best of me.
Moogle was in Mario Hoops 3-on-3. i really dont care if moogle is in or not, but i just thought id metion that
Ah, thank you Smasherk for enlightening me.
XD yeah, sonic and mario are pretty connected (so i completely agree with your argument there)... but i don't think mario really has any other non-nintendo counterparts... which is why moogles aren't in brawl
. i basically just think that square is the next developer in line for a 3rd party candidate, because it's so hugely successful and has many games for nintendo systems... and the moogle is one of the best representations of EVERYTHING square.
Other than CapcomXD yeah, sonic and mario are pretty connected (so i completely agree with your argument there)... but i don't think mario really has any other non-nintendo counterparts... which is why moogles aren't in brawl
Don't sweat it. I'm just glad it didn't come up.
capcom..... they DID help with a couple zelda titles...
. actually, i'm not against megaman at all, it would be kinda cool.
Anybody who has played FE10 will know that Ike is powerful and FAST. They really should have balanced him out more, instead of making him a slow powerhouse. Also, to those saying Black Knight shouldn't be in, he shouldn't, you're right. But if your main reason is because you don't want another slow sword-user, then let me tell you this: the Black Knight is fast as well. Of course, if he does get in(which I hope he doesn't), they will probably make him generic, which is a pity. Don't get me wrong, I really like the Black Knight, and *spoilers for FE10*
FTWcapcom..... they DID help with a couple zelda titles...
i probably would consider this more if i weren't so in love with moogles/indifferent to megaman
capcom + square for ssb4 3rd parties >_>
Was Ike really balanced like that? Thats sucks! I don't get why Nintendo made him so slow... maybe it was to counter Marth's quickness?
I see what you mean now. It doesn't make sense in the first place. If I recall, the game canon also mentions that
Thank you both for understanding. I really started to question his knowledge when he said this: "Each character has throwing power. Those from the Fire Emblem series have bad throwing power, and...." Okay, get this:Ike wields a two handed sword with one hand. In FE, he has one of the best strength stats. So, of course it's perfectly natural that he is able to wield a two-handed, but because of this info, he can't lift other things with ease. What.The.Hell.
I don't think that Sakurai pulls ALL of the unique moves out of his *** though. I refuse to begin a Sakurai debate on this productive thread, though, so let's just drop him.
I don't think Final Smashes were intended to copy an ultimate move from a game to SSB. Honestly, if Mario's Final Smash was turning into Metal Mario or getting wings on his caps, who would give a crap?
I meant that I remembered Aonuma saying that he might bring Midna back in another Zelda game if people liked her enough, which I'm pretty sure they do.SmashChu said:
Actually, there's Goemon, Konami's technicolored ninja mascot. However, they haven't made any new games starring him and his buddies since 2005...
However, he is a decent counterpart to Mario(more in Japan than in the USA).
I'll start bottom-up. His shoes look extremely cool with the blue and silver armor, but they dispose of that.Next, his pants. Not much wrong, but his stance really makes it look bad. Next, his top. They give him a shirt with a small collar(spelling?), while, in the orginal, no collar and it's a brown leather mail, with no sleeves. Shoulders have blue and yellow armor, but they replace that with brown leather. Face is extremly doll-like, and his bandana is much longer in FE.Now, my favorite part of him in FE, the cape. To be honest, I just personally dislike what they did to it in brawl. And lastly, his stance. In FE's, he is much more awesome. Nothing else needs to be said on that one
. Think about it like this: They based Legend of Zelda closely to TP, so why not here? It would have been much better.
That won me over.
Glad to hear it.
I am sorry, but you are horribly, horribly wrong on this.
Also, Chief, we were talking about his speed stat, not how fast he attacks in FE. Speed determines how many times you attack, not who goes first.
I acknowledge his design is from FE9, but regardless, they warped that one horribly, too. Three more things:1.)There's a three year difference between FE9 and FE10. It's obvious that the age is from FE10. 2.) There were three delays. In this time, they could have changed it to the more bad*ss version of Ike, no problem.3.)I am not talking about how fast he moves! I am talking about his speed stat, which does not determine who moves first, but rather, who attacks more times. Regardless, it will be transferred to actual speed in Brawl, which should be more true to the game.I am sorry, but you are horribly, horribly wrong on this.
THAT is Ike. His Brawl model is based off of the above design, not Radiant Dawn-Ike, who's a good 10 or so years older than Path of Radiance-Ike.
THE BRAWL DESIGN IS PERFECT, YOU ARE CRAZY
And I know what you were talking about. You mean like how fast Ike actually moves, which is also what I was talking about. He moves about as fast in Fire Emblem as he does in Brawl.
No, he didn't.
I think it's a really bad idea to think that the team would have delayed the game to change a character's outfit.darkserenade said:
Well...that's even worse. Why oh why would the developers use a numbered statistic to determine how quickly a character can attack?
The first few bits of FE10 shown was a picture Gatrie and Ike from a cutscene. Just as Lucas and Roy were for later games(Roy having a slightly different case), I don't see why Mr. Sakurai couldn't ask about the design of it.
Sonic and Wolf. 'Nuff said.
appearantly he didn't "deliver" what he promised, and even after all those delays, Brawl still didn't turn out the way we wanted to
