Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Well, some people often say that some character kills early, and therefore gains advantage against meta knight that way. "That's stupid, killing early helps you beat everyone". Actually, killing early does give you an enhanced advantage against MK. It has to do with the math of the thing.Everytime somebody talks about the DK vs MK match-up, the main reason, why DK is supposed to have the advantage is "because MK is leight".
By that logic, MK has lots of bad match-ups...
...that's pretty much sums it up...
*Facepalms*MK has no bad match ups
It's true. No need to facepalm (:*Facepalms*
I wasn't facepalming at it being wrong. I was facepalming at the "make statement contradicting someone without any support then walking away" aspect of it.It's true. No need to facepalm (:
Except me.MK has no bad match ups
hrm, technically he doesn't have to support it, if he's just trying to start discussion. Every matchup is assumed neutral until proven bad, that's the burden of evidence
Why do you assume that's the only reason? Other characters with similair problems (Wario and DK) are still pretty high.I dont think that putting Lucas and Ness at the bottom because of Marths Semi infinite chain grab is a good enough reason.
I recant, i was in a silly mood.You say he doesn't need proof because you agree with him. I do too, I don't think there are any match-ups worse than 50-50 (or MAYBE 45-55), but he still needs to explain himself since others disagree.
Prove it. I use Marth and that is what I focus on in this matchup unless I have agreed to not do this. So why do you think this? I think it makes sense, because anyone can pick up Marth for the first time and press grab and the pummel and then dsmash when they are at high percents, so this makes sense.I dont think that putting Lucas and Ness at the bottom because of Marths Semi infinite chain grab is a good enough reason.
As someone else said. DK and Wario are infinite grabbed as well by certain characters... they're still high. That's enough proof that the chaingrab isn't the only reason.Prove it. I use Marth and that is what I focus on in this matchup unless I have agreed to not do this. So why do you think this? I think it makes sense, because anyone can pick up Marth for the first time and press grab and the pummel and then dsmash when they are at high percents, so this makes sense.
lmao, just try to beat my ness with that strategy, i've beaten so many marths at tourneys who think the matchup is so easy, but really it isn't. and no ness and lucas really shouldn't be that low, they really are some of the hardest characters to actually grab, especially lucas with his spacing abilities its alot harder than u think.Prove it. I use Marth and that is what I focus on in this matchup unless I have agreed to not do this. So why do you think this? I think it makes sense, because anyone can pick up Marth for the first time and press grab and the pummel and then dsmash when they are at high percents, so this makes sense.
I accept your apology. :-pI recant, i was in a silly mood.
Yes, randomly running around and saying "MK has no bad matchups" is spam.
That was exactly the point. Ness and Lucas are low because they are relatively bad. DK and Wario are high because they are relatively good. The fact that DK and Wario are high shows that infinites don't hold characters back that much, because I couldn't imagine either moving up much at all even without the infinites. Without the infinite, Lucas and Ness would still most likely be low tier.But Wario and DK have more going for them normally then Lucas and Ness. Without the infinite release grabs, DK and Wario would be higher than the Earthbound boys.
says the man with the ganondorf avatar. lolthey arent bad they just take a lot of time to master.
Well I've never heard THAT before >.>
They're harder to play than average for less pay-off. Same with Yoshi, but Yoshi actually has a lot more potential, imho.jeez, all the put downs on my earthbound boys, they aren't bad characters at all, they just take alot of time to master, just like it takes a while to become good with peach or bowser, its not like metaknight where u can pick up the controller and mash the A button randomly and win.
You haven't heard anything about Ganondorf's isn't bad and is just played poorly come out from me have you?says the man with the ganondorf avatar. lol
Ness is better than yoshi, but he still won't be going anywhere anytime soon. Lucas may move up if people actually decide to play him.Ness is very good. I dont see how someone could think he isnt. Hes an overall solid character, high mid imo. Strong aerials, good smashes, pk fire =/ Good matchups in general. Lucas is alright, not as strong as ness but still pretty good.
Also, ness>yoshi. Definately.
lol, funny, awkward hitboxes doesn't mean bad wow, it just means learn the character better, and no his Uair does not have a weird startup lag wtf are you talking about, its pretty much instant and ko's better than most Uairs, and his Bair is incredibly easy to connect with, and its not nerfed, the properties on it were changed just like his Bthrow, and how dare you insult the yoyos, the best mindgame smash ever, not to mention his kickass spike, as for lucas, he's alright but he's nowhere near ness.Ness is better than yoshi, but he still won't be going anywhere anytime soon. Lucas may move up if people actually decide to play him.
As far as Ness goes, he's like a chubby little kid, he's just a little to slow to do anyrhing worthwhile. You say his aerials are good when in actuality, they are average to crap. Well i take that back, fair is amazing, instant start-up IIRC, autocanceling, disjointed, and great range. Nair is a nair, just meh. The rest of his aerials all have a weird start-up that just makes them bad. Not only do they have awkward hitboxes, but they're underwhelmingly powered and difficult to time and hit with. It seems like he has to "wind-up" all of them. Bair got nerfed to oblivion and while easier to hit than teh kn33, is still not that strong. Uair can kill, but is very predictable and easy to dodge due to start-up lag. On the ground he's not that great, bat is slow, yo-yo is not that strong and knocks the opponent far enough back to recompose themselves and his tilts lack range. His projectiles are a bit below average as a whole, Smash DI pwns his PK fire
Lucas to me is like a mid tier GaW. He has disjoints everywhere even though he enters the fight empty-handed. Fair, dair, and nair come out instantly, nair and bair autocancel, uair is quicker than Ness' though still predictable and awkward to hit with, and besides uair, all of his aerials are disjointed. On the ground he still rocks, great ftilt an utilt, great fsmash and dsmash, and decent jab (kick lolwut???) combo. PK fire is amazing, PK thunder is amazing, PK freeze is trash, PSI magnet is amazing. Lucas has potential, but shouldn't be ranked to high as of now since he can't back up his claims, but when the low tier tournies start, I know that he'll truly begin to shine.
Ummm, would you care to distinguish between those too? Are you refering to recovery as something seperate from fighting?Ness is a better fighter but that doesn't mean everything in Brawl. Lucas has better properties, which matters more, unfortunately...
I know that! I never said Ness or Lucas were bad, and I agree, Lucas can be hard to grab, but you can't deny that Lucas and Ness would be better if Marth could not infinite them, and where did I say that this was an easy matchup? I didn't and that is because I don't think this is an easy matchup, I think that it is just made a hell of a lot easier by the fact that Marth has an infinite on them. But in this matchup, I use grab to punish instead of DS out of shield, I'll shieldgrab if they try to touch my shield.lmao, just try to beat my ness with that strategy, i've beaten so many marths at tourneys who think the matchup is so easy, but really it isn't. and no ness and lucas really shouldn't be that low, they really are some of the hardest characters to actually grab, especially lucas with his spacing abilities its alot harder than u think.
I mean, there's a differnce between the "qualitly" of certain moves (which is where Ness wins imo) and other stuff like: wieght, speed...Ummm, would you care to distinguish between those too? Are you refering to recovery as something seperate from fighting?
This is a fighting game, so I'd consider that fairly important.
Dude, WTF is wrong with you!?!?!?!?!?Still not sure why so many people think that Ness is better than Lucas, I just made a huge wall-o-text as to why Lucas is the better choice. Ness is bad in the air and Lucas Rocks in the air. If you think Ness doesn't have any start-up on his uair, try doing one going into someone with a multi-hit dair. Yeah that's a bad example and I have no idea how that would prove anything, but I'm far to lazy to look for the debug data. Also Lucas' moveset is miles better than Ness. Lucas also isn't gimped by someone jumping into his PK Thunder. He does win in grabs since Lucas struggles to grab someone and when he does, they're a bit underwhelming.
Ness has an amazing fair, a decent nair, and a usable dair. Yo-yo is meh, bat is too slow, tilts don't go far enough and his dash attack is decent.
Lucas has a huge arsenal since almost all of his moves are usable. Bair and nair autocancel, nair easily chains into utilt if you ff so the last hit doesn't come out. Fair is all around good range, speed and priority. His projectiles and ground attacks are way better. Not sure how people can even begin to believe that Ness has the better moveset when Lucas has fair, dair, bair, nair, ftilt, utilt, dsmash, fsmash, >B, ^B and VB at his disposal.
Ness' PK Fiyyahr > Lucas' Big Gay Fiyur.Still not sure why so many people think that Ness is better than Lucas, I just made a huge wall-o-text as to why Lucas is the better choice. Ness is bad in the air and Lucas Rocks in the air. If you think Ness doesn't have any start-up on his uair, try doing one going into someone with a multi-hit dair. Yeah that's a bad example and I have no idea how that would prove anything, but I'm far to lazy to look for the debug data. Also Lucas' moveset is miles better than Ness. Lucas also isn't gimped by someone jumping into his PK Thunder. He does win in grabs since Lucas struggles to grab someone and when he does, they're a bit underwhelming.
Ness has an amazing fair, a decent nair, and a usable dair. Yo-yo is meh, bat is too slow, tilts don't go far enough and his dash attack is decent.
Lucas has a huge arsenal since almost all of his moves are usable. Bair and nair autocancel, nair easily chains into utilt if you ff so the last hit doesn't come out. Fair is all around good range, speed and priority. His projectiles and ground attacks are way better. Not sure how people can even begin to believe that Ness has the better moveset when Lucas has fair, dair, bair, nair, ftilt, utilt, dsmash, fsmash, >B, ^B and VB at his disposal.
Recovery. Lucas definately has better recovery, and that means alot in a few matchups.Bair isnt usable unless as edgeguard. Fair is laggyish. Ness' fair>everyone one of lucas' aerials. His nair is very good, but small range means soem characters will make it hard to approach with.
Lucas has better jabs and tilts and fsmash, but thats pretty much it.