• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

Official BBR Tier List v5

Status
Not open for further replies.

Z'zgashi

Smash Legend
Joined
May 20, 2009
Messages
17,322
Location
WeJo, Utah
NNID
ZzgashiZzShy
3DS FC
1521-3678-2980
Dammit people, what they're saying is STOP THINKING RATIO NUMBERS

1 = slight advantage
2 = moderate advantage
3 = strong advantage
4 = imma **** you up advantage
 

Flayl

Smash Hero
Joined
May 15, 2006
Messages
5,520
Location
Portugal
winning 6/10 times is a pretty big deal.
that's a relatively significant gap in character performance imo.
Pick any matchup that's called "55:45" on these boards and I guarantee you results will be a lot closer to "6 sets out of ten" than "11 sets out of 20".

edit: Might be the first time ever I agree with Zz'gashi.
 

Spelt

BRoomer
BRoomer
Joined
Feb 6, 2009
Messages
11,841
Dammit people, what they're saying is STOP THINKING RATIO NUMBERS

1 = slight advantage
2 = moderate advantage
3 = strong advantage
4 = imma **** you up advantage
Kind of.
It was also related to the old scale and it's meaning a few times.
This is a very ambiguous conversation.

Pick any matchup that's called "55:45" on these boards and I guarantee you results will be a lot closer to "6 sets out of ten" than "11 sets out of 20".
BUT 11/20 is obviously more accurate.
 

DMG

Smash Legend
Joined
Feb 12, 2006
Messages
18,958
Location
Waco
Slippi.gg
DMG#931
Dammit people, what they're saying is STOP THINKING RATIO NUMBERS

1 = slight advantage
2 = moderate advantage
3 = strong advantage
4 = imma **** you up advantage
Basically

6:4
7:3
8:2
9:1

or

55:45
6:4
7:3
+++
 

Flayl

Smash Hero
Joined
May 15, 2006
Messages
5,520
Location
Portugal
Kind of.
It was also related to the old scale and it's meaning a few times.
This is a very ambiguous conversation.



BUT 11/20 is obviously more accurate.
It's not more accurate if it's FICTIONAL. Brawl ain't that balanced yo.
 

Spelt

BRoomer
BRoomer
Joined
Feb 6, 2009
Messages
11,841
It's not more accurate if it's FICTIONAL. Brawl ain't that balanced yo.
What. :079:
According to the current day metagame, brawl is fairly balanced.
Some people would argue there's only a few truly bad characters.
And bad does not automatically mean unviable, they're just sometimes used in the same context.


 

DMG

Smash Legend
Joined
Feb 12, 2006
Messages
18,958
Location
Waco
Slippi.gg
DMG#931
BOB THE BUILDER

CAN HE FIX IT

BOB THE BUILDER

YES HE CAN!









But then MK comes and Shuttle Loops it all...
 

TheReflexWonder

Wonderful!
BRoomer
Joined
Feb 10, 2005
Messages
13,704
Location
Atlanta, GA
NNID
TheReflexWonder
3DS FC
2492-4449-2771
Whatever makes you feel better. A "slight advantage" is somewhere between the vicinity of 55-45 and 60-40 to me, more like 52.5-47.5 and 57.5/42.5 in the way you're used to. Take the numbers with a grain of salt and use your best judgment.
 

Flayl

Smash Hero
Joined
May 15, 2006
Messages
5,520
Location
Portugal
Well if I said Bowser is -1 with Game & Watch, I would be accused of lowballing it to a "near even" rather than a small disadvantage (which is what I think it is).

Spelt: I looked up results for matchups like MK VS IC and MK VS Falco for the last MK ban thread. That stuff wasn't 55:45, but feel free to continue thinking they are.
 

Espy Rose

Dumb horse.
Joined
May 31, 2006
Messages
30,577
Location
Texas
NNID
EspyRose
Dammit people, what they're saying is STOP THINKING RATIO NUMBERS

1 = slight advantage
2 = moderate advantage
3 = strong advantage
4 = imma **** you up advantage
This, this, for the love of all that is holy, THIS.
 

Spelt

BRoomer
BRoomer
Joined
Feb 6, 2009
Messages
11,841
Spelt: I looked up results for matchups like MK VS IC and MK VS Falco for the last MK ban thread. That stuff wasn't 55:45, but feel free to continue thinking they are.
I don't even know where this came from.
If you think you're gonna be proved right by making no sense, two can play at this game. :mad:
 

Life

Smash Hero
Joined
Jul 19, 2010
Messages
5,264
Location
Grieving No Longer
Falco-Pika is clearly 20pi-15e Pika's favor (that probably doesn't add exactly, the excess is to deal with the Falco going MK in game 2). And don't get me started on how Dorf goes e^(pi*i) to 11^2-20 with Olimar.

For something useful, +1 Zz's post.
 

TheReflexWonder

Wonderful!
BRoomer
Joined
Feb 10, 2005
Messages
13,704
Location
Atlanta, GA
NNID
TheReflexWonder
3DS FC
2492-4449-2771
Spelt: I looked up results for matchups like MK VS IC and MK VS Falco for the last MK ban thread. That stuff wasn't 55:45, but feel free to continue thinking they are.
That's not the rest of the game's fault, though. :(

Outside of that jerk, I would say the game is rather balanced overall.
 

Flayl

Smash Hero
Joined
May 15, 2006
Messages
5,520
Location
Portugal
I don't even know where this came from.
If you think you're gonna be proved right by making no sense, two can play at this game. :mad:
Dude, keep up. You said that 55:45 matchups are the result of more accurate analysis. I said Brawl wasn't really balanced enough to have plenty of those kinds of matchups. Then you went on a tangent and said the game is pretty balanced and there are few characters that are truly bad. Then I went back to the original point which was matchups that are deemed 55:45 by the boards don't reflect on actual tournament outcomes, which I did a bit of research for back when MK was still a legal topic.
 

Spelt

BRoomer
BRoomer
Joined
Feb 6, 2009
Messages
11,841
okay, so you're using out of date information for an obvious outlier?
I can play this game as well.
 

Flayl

Smash Hero
Joined
May 15, 2006
Messages
5,520
Location
Portugal
okay, so you're using out of date information for an obvious outlier?
I can play this game as well.
OK, you are clearly missing the point. The information was relevant AT THE TIME. Character boards were using 55-45 AT THE TIME.

But go ahead and do research for a common enough matchup yourself, I'm not making this **** up. I don't have a reason to do so.
 

stingers

Smash Obsessed
Joined
Oct 21, 2006
Messages
26,796
Location
Raleigh, NC
no way dude. its definitely 51.9367 to 48.0633 jigglypuffs favor.



clearly.
you are such a ****ing ******* there is no way the ratio is anywhere near that you inbred *****. I ****ing hate you and I hope your kids are born with AIDs and that they *** **** you when your sleeping and you get AIDs and die a miserable ****ing death all alone with your entire family celebrating the fact that your miserable ***** *** excuse for an existence is finally over
 

Xebenkeck

Smash Lord
Joined
Mar 30, 2008
Messages
1,636
Location
My Head
you are such a ****ing ******* there is no way the ratio is anywhere near that you inbred *****. I ****ing hate you and I hope your kids are born with AIDs and that they *** **** you when your sleeping and you get AIDs and die a miserable ****ing death all alone with your entire family celebrating the fact that your miserable ***** *** excuse for an existence is finally over
Your both idiots, those numbers don't even equal 100.....:troll::troll: That last .00001 is important
 

Spelt

BRoomer
BRoomer
Joined
Feb 6, 2009
Messages
11,841
you are such a ****ing ******* there is no way the ratio is anywhere near that you inbred *****. I ****ing hate you and I hope your kids are born with AIDs and that they *** **** you when your sleeping and you get AIDs and die a miserable ****ing death all alone with your entire family celebrating the fact that your miserable ***** *** excuse for an existence is finally over
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_L-wKdCY7UXI/TUl5uuCQLiI/AAAAAAAAA1Y/TapAPxmpHPE/s1600/******-1.jpg
 

Seagull Joe

Smash Legend
Joined
Sep 14, 2008
Messages
10,388
Location
Maryland
NNID
SeagullJoe
not everyone conceptualizes the MUs in that way

according to the actual project:

+1 was defined as small advantage (55:45 according to previous notions, though no ratio was given)
+2 was defined as soft counter (6:4 " " ")
+3 was defined as hard counter (7:3 " " ")
+4 was defined as unloseable. (9:1 " " ")

i agree with what's laid out above above. however, there have been a few discrepancies, like i said before. the MKs thought they only soft countered ddd, simply because they destroyed other characters harder, while all the ddds (well, all two of us) simply wouldn't lower from our -3, hard counter. we never came to a resolution.

though i think the project was a great idea and executed very well, these kind of issues are ALWAYS going to be there. just try to take it with a grain of salt.

oh yeah, and i really don't mean to be rude but, why are so many people so confident in ALL of their characters matchups? a few regulars in this thread live in isolated regions with little relative talent, how can you be so cocksure?
Interesting.
trust me, i know. he says my character soundly destroys snake and goes even with olimar. i know, man.

the old system kinda sucked but at least it provided some kind of framework with understanding how different characters interact. it's difficult to kinda nail these ideas down but it's still really important, and until another form comes about, we gotta deal with it.
Define what an isolated region is pertaining to smash.

I do not say that. I say D3 vs Snake is what you would consider +2 D3's favor and Olimar is -2. This guy beats them odds:
 

Z'zgashi

Smash Legend
Joined
May 20, 2009
Messages
17,322
Location
WeJo, Utah
NNID
ZzgashiZzShy
3DS FC
1521-3678-2980
On topic: Why isn't Diddy Kong banned yet?
Because there isn't any reason for him to be? He's not even the best character. He has a few weaknesses and can be abused offstage.

If you want to ***** and moan about a character, at least make it Meta Knight as its obvious he has no problems.
 

stingers

Smash Obsessed
Joined
Oct 21, 2006
Messages
26,796
Location
Raleigh, NC
we shouldn't ban diddy kong. we should just ban bananas. and if the diddy hits down b during the match they auto-lose. seems fair to me
 

DMG

Smash Legend
Joined
Feb 12, 2006
Messages
18,958
Location
Waco
Slippi.gg
DMG#931
z: trolling has started to get to you. I suggest a counter troll maneuver.
 

Juushichi

sugoi ~ sugoi ~
Joined
Dec 8, 2009
Messages
5,518
Location
Columbus, Ohio
Because there isn't any reason for him to be? He's not even the best character. He has a few weaknesses and can be abused offstage.

If you want to ***** and moan about a character, at least make it Meta Knight as its obvious he has no problems.
... :) You're so gullible, Z.
 

Sinister Slush

❄ I miss my kind ❄
Moderator
BRoomer
Joined
Sep 1, 2009
Messages
14,009
Location
The land that never Snows
NNID
SinisterSlush
If you want to ***** and moan about a character, at least make it Meta Knight as its obvious he has no problems.
Wahhh wahhh... All of MK's moves are framesafe, Every B move makes him recover, 3 Tournament Rules brought up from the ground to keep MK from being banned...

Yeah yeah, we've gone over the *****ing thousands of times with MK. Lets just drop it and argue more about the supposed "Ratios"
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom