lol then it was just a bad example.
jman got beat twice, and by a pikachu. I thought shiz was top level also.
id also argue that top level peach players probably haven't run into any low tier mains recently with the exception of macD losing to cosmo. and AR did drop a game to axe.
im fairly certain what he meant was that if a low tier is going to beat a known, pro level player or even one comparable to their level of skill its gonna be a fox or falco. low tiers/the cast in general puts more emphasis on learning that MU (spacie), then falcon.
not actually that top level players are dropping games left and right, because if they were our tier list might be just a tad different.
id also like to sau aXe has like the highest level of execution ive ever seem from a low tier. his level of mastery over his character is comparable to players of jman caliber. he seems to be on the same level and he can compete.
*facepalm*
Im not sure anyone even understands what we're talking about anymore.
Originally (like 2 pages ago) someone said something like "Axe beating jman wasnt anything special, foxs lose all the time to low tier mains"
My response on consequent posts in this thread have basically been, in a nutshell "Axe beating jman is a monumental event, Players of the qualty of jman level, have almost never ever lost to a low tier player, PERIOD"
I dont care how many pro/semi pro players lose to low tier mains. But, top 5 players IN THE WORLD (jman) shouldnt (read: never other than this one time) lose to low tier characters.
Therefore, Axe beating jman was HUGE. thats all i was trying to say.
Also, the point that fox and falco would probably be the characters most likely to lose to low tiers overall, is negligible because it simply doesnt happen at the level we are talking about anyway.
come on people, follow the ENTIRE discussion and not just the last few posts.
@merkuri: yea, beating swift/sw/lovage isnt the same as beating jman/armada