Yes, this will be jolly good fun! I was hoping for this.
Lmao!! You lead the panel?? You wouldn't even have access to the NJ Finder account if it wasn't for me giving it to you, which I shouldn't have because I was told never to do so by panelists in the past. That's why I took forever to give it to you and I only gave it to you cause I was too lazy to make updates.
I don't need access to be considered the leader of the panel. That has nothing to do with it. I am widely considered the leader of NJ, and I tend to start and control the discussions regarding the rankings. I've been a panelist since before you even played Smash. You're not in charge. I am.
Years before your voice of opinion was nearly never included because people thought your opinion was bull****. Need proof? Just ask any of the NJ panelists from the Melee days to the begining of Brawl. Your inclusion of the panel being more significant now is becasue original panelists stopped giving half a ****.
Wrong. It doesn't matter if they
say my opinion wasn't wanted. When it comes down to actions and what happened, I was included in the discussions and my opinions strongly influenced every list, and continue to influence the Brawl lists more than anyone else's.
Stop saying doubles was included without getting opinions from the other panelists. As far as I know, they HAVE NEVER BEEN INCLUDED!! THEY ALSO WERE NEVER INCLUDED IN MELEE....ALONG WITH YOUR OPINION FOR THE LAST YEAR AND A HALF OF THE MELEE RANKINGS CAUSE YOUR OPINION WAS UNWANTED!!!!
But it was, especially in my own list, which was basically used again with very minor changes as opposed to absolutely no changes like last time.
It's funny how you can spout off this nonsense, but actions and facts directly contradict your empty words. Fool.
I hope I don't have to repeat that paragraph again. Nevermind, I know I will.
Perhaps you should give up having this debate with me then? You lose it every time.
Ksizzle outplaced DM cause of singles wins and DM outplaced Pierce cause of singles wins. I never thought those spot were debatable.
ksizzle was supposed to be 5th, so that's fine.
How do you explain ksizzle being below me when our records were the same?
Doubles, low tiers, etc.
Pierce was not tied or ahead of DM. DM beat more significant people than Pierce, that's at least how I decided my opinion of the list in the end. We need to discuss this stuff more accurately if we are confused at why people are getting ranked whatever they are in the future. This rankings stuff is beggining to get more and more sloppily done everytime :/
Perhaps you should consult the results again, because dmbrandon had an extremely rough two months of the season and only pulled off a few decent wins in the end of it. Pierce was good the whole time.
I don't think it's sloppy. I think it's done really well, even with you clashing with me (and get wrecked) in public all the time.
Because, after all of this empty talk and your foolish words, I will win in the end when the list is discussed privately. Like always.
lol, I hate argueing over this ****. I was so close to saying nothing but don't want Blue to outrank Atomsk due to low tier doubles results
You're being ridiculous. Teams, low tiers, etc. would only come into account when ties or extremely close calls are debated, which has
always been the case.
But, no, you seem to think I'm implying that doubles and low tiers count as much as singles towards singles rankings. Fool. Stop being an idiot.
Edit: Emblem Lord would tear some *** on this subject.
That man can't debate anymore.