Wonder Project J
@Mod: In the event that a player with an investigative role was hammered while an investigation was pending for that role, would the hammerer inherit that information along with the role? Also, when May asked J what her role PM stated specifically, and J answered "yes it does 100% I am the Town Sane Cop", does that count as quoting your role PM? He may not have put it in quotes, put there was no paraphrasing there at all.
@Summoner and GorditoBoy: Vote for J. We've lost Xastrn and EP; it's up to us if this is going to happen. Specifically for GorditoBoy, read the part after the second quoted section and compare it to your role PM. For Summoner, what do you need to hear to be convinced to vote for J if you aren't already?
@J: Why didn't you inform us that your laptop had broken and that it would be a factor in your activity? Clearly, it wasn't before the game started, or you would have mentioned that instead of sickness.
On what days are you claiming you didn't have a laptop? Other than J and JBandit999, what usernames do you go by on other sites? I'm going to scour Smashboards, DeviantART, livejournal, Facebook, Twitter, EVERYTHING, to check how often you posted those days and where, to see if your average number of posts per day suffered (on Smashboards, it actually increased). A broken laptop is the sort of thing that a person typically mentions online, and yet in my preliminary search I've not been able to find ANYWHERE where J/JBandit999 has mentioned a broken laptop. Also, what is the contact information for the place where you had your laptop fixed? Phone number, e-mail address, whatever. Scanning your receipt and posting it here would be acceptable too.
J said:
I, myself, want a deeper investigation in Summoner. I have reasoning to believe because of a certain shroud around him. However I still need to re-read before I can give a legit response as to why.
This doesn't make ANY SENSE. You were pushing for Summoner since Day 1, and yet you STILL haven't given ANY reason for this other than your investigation. And THAT isn't conclusive of ANYTHING. Further, you claim that you don't know how your investigation powers work. Since several pms said they were sent in for analysis (but not mine), as compared to lost or not receiving results, it would make sense that you would receive it toMorrow. And yet, you keep pushing to lynch/look into someone that you can probably clear/confirm as guilty toMorrow WITH LITERALLY NO REASON. WHY WOULD YOU DO THAT?
When did you begin thinking that smargaret was a strong player? You literally tried to claim she was scum for saying "mafia" instead of "town" in post, and made no indication that you had changed your mind on her prowess.
J said:
It could be a role or a scum-tell but it is something.
Regardless of why your ability didn't work, WHY AREN'T YOU AWARE OF WHAT YOUR ABILITY DOES? My ability was clearly explained in the role that I received from Kataefi, and your role PM should state whether you get roles or alignment. Why would a "Sane Town Cop" get role information, which is what a "Role Cop" normally does? After all, what else could it say? "You are the Sane Town Cop, you may investigate one player each Night but you don't know if you will learn the target's role or alignment, and even then, it might not work"? That's ********, but that's what you make it sound like.
This reminds me of a game I once played with Delvro, where he claimed that he was a Hated Townie, but then said that he showed up as guilty to investigations (which is what a Miller is), and everyone was so caught up in other stupid **** that they missed it (even me).
J said:
Oh and to Swiss' claim, I knew it was full of BS. However think of it as this. If I did claim against Swiss N0 cop claim then who would have died N1? I would not have been able to help the town at all plus if Swiss did keep the ruse going to the next day I planned to stop it. This is kindof a WIFOM but yea that was my train of thought. It would have been bad claiming so early in the game.
Bull****. Counterclaiming is effectively the same as getting a guilty result, something you've already said that you would have done. It doesn't matter if we've already found a scum or not; outing a scum is outing a scum. Even then, you DIDN'T EVEN TRY TO PUSH AGAINST SWISS AT ALL. Why would you have waited until the next Day? Why wouldn't you have just made a case normally?
@Xastrn: We aren't lynching X1 toDay. He IS the other scum, but I can't trust the Town to lynch J after I'm dead. I'm seriously disappointed that with TWO of you, you can't see that he is lying to us.
@All: We have 4 lynches available to us. Which four would you pick to ensure we get a victory?