Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Saying I won that game so you should remember? I don't see the self praise. I in no way belittled you. You immediately got offended and spouted that Marshy and you did all the work. Now which seems more caught up in itself:Seriously, how is that not being caught up in yourself?
I wasn't going to point it out yesterday because I'd rather have seen if the kills lined up based on that. However, Vyse flipped survivor anyway, so it turned out to be nothing. I felt like explaining when I picked Kataefi/Vyse out of the two I'd prefer to lynch when it came to Frozen's utility lynch, I did have reason for picking them over others.What's the purpose of showing us that now?
"I don't really want to uncap Marsh King, I want to uncap Macman. But I'm going to blend in with the crowd I think. PS: I'm sad they got incapped cause they are good!"I'm sad to see Macman get incapped - don't know much about Handorin sadly. I find mac is often curious and instinctive, which is always good. But my uncap vote goes to you marshy because I feel you can make some really nice calculated observations when prompted to do so. It's interesting because when I first starting playing with you I thought you were just a bunch of one liners.
The one game of forum mafia that has completed, I was not mafia.Mayling, first answer this: Have you ever been mafia before?
If we're assuming there is four scum, then wouldn't we want to un-incap someone other than Marsh king? I mean, I see what you're saying, but if we un-incap Macman or Hando, assuming Marshy has two incaps on him, then they have to incap Macman/Hando twice. They have more of a "buffer zone" than Marsh King does if there's four scum and Marshy got hit twice.[/LIST]
uncap: The Marsh King
The possibility the The Marsh King was incapped twice is better than macman or hando getting incapped twice I think; so scum will have to risk losing another incap to finish off marshy by not knowing who should target him and multiple people targeting him or none of them target him at all resulting in a clear townie for a longer period of time. Both seem win-win to me.
I'm feeling very uncomfortable with Mayling. More to come on this later but I want to hear some thoughts from Mayling about the Night events. I understand you're busy =( but even if it's just a small post, that's fine with me!
This may seem strange, but I think that scum was trying to set me up. Why I think that I'm getting set up? Well, I did say that I thought s2/hando was innocent. Hando in response said he had uneasy feelings about me. But seeing as Hando came up capped, I was obviously right. This is where my thoughts start getting complicated and a little weird.Yeah, Mac and Marshy are two obvious choices. Trying to rid two strong players, and Hando, well to be honest I'm not sure. So I'm going to say scum has a sense of humor.
Reiterating, I was town in the game that's completed.Have any of you ever been scum before? Could you link me to the game if you have?
Yeah, I know.Mayling, I think you're misunderstanding how Incapping, and Un-incapping works.
You have 3 "incap credits" so to speak. This means, you can be targeted by the infected a maximum of 2 times before dying. The third time you get incapped you die no matter what. If you are incapped at night and you aren't at the limit, you will come up as "incapped" during the day. If this is your status, the majority of players must vote to "uncap" you to keep you from bleeding out. That is all that the "Uncapping" does, it simply prevents you from dying from less than three incaps. It doesn't give you back an incap credit. So hypothetically, if Marshy was targeted by two infected, and Hando and Mac were both only targeted by one, uncapping Marshy would not put him back down to only one incap, and targeting Hando or Mac would not reduce their incap count to zero. Their counts would all stay the same, it's just that they won't bleed out and die.
At least that's the impression I got from what the rules say. People feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.
Just thought I'd clear that up with my sliver of spare time today. Happy holidays everyone! =D
T his.I would much rather lynch Ronike then anyone.
Re-reading more however.
Well, sure its slightly scummy, I mean people lynched a wagon in a day. But the fact that no one likes bandwagons and we were so close to a deadline and so many vets were on it at the start, it really is quite close to a null tell. I'd have to go back and read quick to make sure of that, but no, I'm not immediately suspicious of people on that wagon.OK. Does the fact that somebody hopped the wagon compound to suspicions you already had on that player or is it null?
Except a lot of people see me as the play today, making it easy for mafia to sneak in and and throw more suspicion at me, thus making me an easy target. Its true that medi wouldn't fight back, but its too early for people to advocate an inactive lynch, so he's not really an easy target. No worries though, you aren't on my scum list.It's not like I haven't voiced suspicions against you D1 already. If I wanted an easy target I'd just hop Mediocre for not playing. That's an easy target (or other rather inactive players). I don't see an experienced player, who actively posts a lot as an overly easy target.
That particular connection is interesting, and mentos is definetely high up on my possible scum list, but not as high as 4 other people: kevin, mcfox, chaco, and circus.Circus "breadcrumbing" and mentos "coaching" him to not do so has been an issue most of D1 (to me at least) and put mentos up high on my scumlist. Now Circus tried to give credit to mentos for not voting the confirmed survivor. What do you think about that connection?
Kevin's "contributions" were ****. It was just an attempt to coordinate with a few of his buddies (especially mcfox) while framing certain other people (me) with incriminating questions. He's highest on my scum list, I just didn't mention it because it is imperative to my case, and I didn't want mafia to realize I was on their tracks. Discussion that Kevin introduced was fruitful? Don't make me laugh. It took the pressure of his mafia mate McFox because he forced me to answer/argue with him (which is generally seen as a null tell because we often don't see eye to eye) instead of argue with a floundering mcfox.What do you think about Kevin's contributions? You Fosed him D1 for those question and like me you had him high up on your scumlist. What happened to that? Do you think the discussion Kevin introduced proved to be fruitful? Did it even had the potential to be fruitful?
Thank you.Haven't been mafia yet. Only been indy once but it was the Simpsons pre-game aka Macmans epic troll.
Presenting a meta case to divert attention.Why is there such movement for a ronike lynch?
The deal is, I think we are banking on scum not knowing who is going for who.Wait, this is what I meant:
This is what I was thinking:
Marshy: 2 Caps.
Hando: 1 Cap.
Mac: 1 Cap.
If we uncap Marshy, only one infected would have to hit him to kill him off. If we uncap the other two, at least two others would have to hit them to finish them off. It all depends on how coordinated the scum have become at this point. If we uncap Marshy, one scum would have to hit him, but there's the chance that two scum might try and hit him. Or we can uncap one of the others to ensure that two of them must hit them. Make sense? :O
Could still be 2 incaps.The deal is, I think we are banking on scum not knowing who is going for who.
We might get 2 people going for marsh again, which would leave is with only one person being incapped the next day.
Man, Ronike, I want to vote for you, yet at the same time, Chaco's really lame last two posts have me suspicious.
He seemed all enthusiastic about your lynch, yet when I asked why, he gave barely a sentence. That bothers me.
If we let this rule how we go about uncapping then we'll be letting the scum rule our actions. What happened to letting them go about proving their own worth?McFox said:And I think Mayling is right, it may be more advantageous for us to not uncap Marshy.