Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Uncup? Looks like a fake vote to me.
What? Risking a NL doesn't clear mentos at all. Especially when he tries to look townie in the process by protecting / not voting a doomed survivor - only scum would know if Vyse really is or not.
Your argument here(and Circus argument as well) would be a lot less pointless had I actually been arguing for the specific survival of Vyse. On the contrary, I was arguing that he had been V/LA and was back at that point, so with the fact that people were wanting to lynch someone to remove potentially inactive/worthless people from the incap pool, Vyse was the worst fitting choice for that. If you look, I never once argued that Vyse was a gg, I solely argued that the reason he was being picked for the lynch was wrong, especially since there were others who were inactive and NOT V/LA. Both you and Circus have made opposing points over something which was not the key point of why I argued the lynch. Risking a NL to say "no I think he's town" could look either way: Doing so because we were essentially voting someone for being V/LA(especially when there were other inactives around) is a different story.
No. I'm like the anti-Iggy. I've never even been independent before.
I think you (and possibly Gheb and Pythag) might be assuming more from my argument than I was actually trying to say. I do not think you are more clear now because you were arguing in favor of Vyse's towniness. I think you are more clear now because, if you were scum, it would be silly for you not to just go with the Vyse lynch. At the very least, I would not expect you to put up a fight. The more townies we lynch, the less work the scum have to do. It would be one thing if people were lynched by a plurality vote, but since we actually need a full majority to lynch, your last minute fight against the current had a legitimate chance of stopping the lynch. Since Vyse was town, scum would have no reason to do this unless they wanted town credit really badly. Am I wrong to feel so confident about you, Mentos?
Bro, you know I've been scum. Why do I need to link it...
He asked about scum. Scum =/= Indy
Yes, I'm aware. That's exactly why I said "No. ...I've never even been independent before." Although, to be fair, the mafiawiki definition of scum does include independents if I recall correctly. Any non-town force, really.
Nah, that's a stretch.
I don't actually blame you for risking the NL. I only told Circus that you not voting for a townie =/= you clear. My vote against you is based on my suspicions from the previous day and Circus' statement confirms to me that there's a strong connection between you two.
Why link it?
I have been mafia once.
Diverting attention in an attempt to present himself as a pro town party, and also making weak meta arguments in the future.
Also, whats the reasoning?
Sorry sorry, been catching up on games the last two days
First of all, a quick lynch without MUCH discussion is a bad idea. We need to wait til everybody has some kind of record to be held accountable for here, otherwise the knowledge we get from tommorrow will be for naught.
What is the point of tommorrow if we have nothing to go on? If the day quickly, we'd start tommorrow still in a half RVS, half shooting in the dark play. I would really like to transition into informed arguements before we enter day 2.
@Circus: Do you disagree?
@Ronike: Do you disagree?
@Sold2: What did Sky Pirates ever do to you? Your airship get plundered or something when you were a kid?
theres not really any reason to contribute anymore because of this whack survivor win condition. So no matter what happens Hando and I have already lost the game =/
