arcansi what specifically are you referring to right now?
I see everything literally and objectively.
I am fundamentally unable to understand art as far as I can tell, and to an extent music.
Yet I am able to have a presentation 'miss' me because (it was on suicide FYI) I can come to a simple conclusion (suicide=part of natural selection=good. Why do we want to understand it when it's intrinsic within the person? I compare this to me not needing to understand your reason to do almost anything unless it directly affects me.)
and not have it dispelled at the end of the presentation when I bring it up.
I mean, I thought they would able to be expand, tell me I'm wrong because of this or something, they're(they referring to both the person presenting the presentation and my psych teacher(a counselor)) adults and way more knowledgeable in this kind of stuff, right?
Yet when I bring it up they seem to absorb it and have no response to it. And then I bring up that a big part of the reason the presentation missed was because I don't feel sad when pets die or relatives get cancer, and all I get is my teacher asking if I've seen a doctor about that. I tell her no and she says something like 'interesting' and doesn't tell me if I should or not, so now I have no idea.
I find myself extremely different from the average person and yet as well as I can describe it I end up with the above where my possible conclusions(because they certainly didn't provide any information) are something like...
1. It was new material to them (How am
I able to come up with new material for
them? I mean, I'm just a high school student...)
2. They had no response to it, for some reason.
I can't think of much else....
I find things similar in essence to this happen more then they should, and other things like I can never know what's going to happen when I do something without previous experience. For most people they can ask themselves what it would be like for them (or some iteration of that type of question about themselves) and be right.
For me, I'm almost always wrong.
I'm also afraid of being outcasted because the smash community doesn't want to deal with me. I don't know how many people have me on ignore already, although that's something that actually makes me sad, illogical loss of potential. Most people seem to be unable to preform consistent logical reasoning, especially over longer periods of time, and end up coming to some weird conclusion (see: Aisights last post in my thread) and leaving the argument.
If everyone did this, I would be right (logically, if nobody can argue against me I am right.)
And although it matters more then you understand that I find out who is correct, it matters much less if nobody feels like listening to me because of this, because of me being who I am with no restraints.
And I don't want to be outcasted for being who I am.
Does that answer your question?
:fluttershy:
EDIT: We need to host a side event with the items brawl on. There are arguments for it being more balanced/better for the game when done correctly and I'd love to see it in testing/play it.