Honestly people only start whining about politics when it involves either representation of or discrimination against minorities, LGBT people, or women.
Any other kind of politics and gamers sit there placidly soaking it up. Not even AWARE that they're watching politics in their game.
If you are gonna call out people for being off topic, at least call out everyone, which would technically include RuffyYoshi and the person who responded to them initially. Otherwise you are kinda incriminating only part of a party and I've gone through enough of life taking the blame for others.
Also, next time just report it, because you can get in just as much trouble for being a mini-mod. I've seen it happen here before.
Honestly people only start whining about politics when it involves either representation of or discrimination against minorities, LGBT people, or women.
Any other kind of politics and gamers sit there placidly soaking it up. Not even AWARE that they're watching politics in their game.
Speaking of being off topic, I find this idea fascinating.
What you have essentially done is point out what I said with different phrasing: The majority of gamers aren't up for modern politics being unnaturally injected into our entertainment medium of choice.
Modern politics have been pretty crazy as of late and mostly focuses on the things you listed, although there are many other things as well, just those seem to be in the spotlight a lot. Regardless of your stance on things, there are extremes to each side, and they have been coming more to the forefront every passing day and everyone out there seems to be demanding you take a side. The thing is, gamers don't want a part of this, but it feels as though we are being forced into it by the decisions of studios or companies that either have a side they want to push or a side they want to pander to.
They way you phrased it almost makes it seem like gamers as a whole are inherently intolerant or despise these things, but it's more that we play games to have fun and politics is just the opposite of that right now. Even if there is a political narrative in a game or that politics is a core feature of the game, there is a different between negotiating for a peace treaty between your fictional country and another fictional country and a publisher pushing pandering for a current politically charged group. There is a difference between controlling an agent and taking down a corrupt government single-handedly and being forced to take a side with real people who are very angry.
Politics in games are fantasy and generally are there to enhance the experience, while currently politics in reality ruins the experience. It's less that gamers aren't aware and more that we want our entertainment media to be left alone when other media has gone down the same path.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not sure how I feel about this Voice Theory thing, and it really doesn't affect Geno's chances, so I'm gonna have to give it a hard pass.
As far as Geno having a voice, I really don't think it will happen. Most of the characters who have voices in Smash have had them as canon voices for a while, though there are some exceptions. Geno doesn't feel like that kind of exception, and I'm not sure casting for him would be possible without tracking down the original creators of Geno and trying to get and idea of what they envisioned him sounding like. Considering how much we've transformed Geno into something, else, I'm not sure giving him any canon voice would work out well either, so silent with awesome SMRPG sound effects sounds like it;s the way to go.