The whole 'campaign' for Geno in Smash and Min Min getting in has made me think seriously about the roster choices relative to the cast of the game's character. In other words, why don't we have more Smash picks who AREN'T the main character of their games? I mean, there are plenty of cases in which even Smash fans, who respect the 'protagonist rule/guideline' support non-main characters. Geno is the most prominent, but I'm referring to cases in which a side character/protagonist is deliberately chosen over the main one. Geno doesn't really count because literally every other party member from Super Mario RPG bar Mallow is already in the game. A more interesting case is Porky from Earthbound, as he is the most supported newcomer from the MOTHER series despite the protagonist of the first game, Ninten, completing the trio of protagonists from all 3 games if he got in. But it makes sense as to one is more supported than the other, after all, who would you choose without context: A third psychic boy who is basically a clone of another character in every way, or a egomaniac 1000 year old kid in a spider mech who used his private pig-themed military to take over an entire continent? While I did 'disqualify' Geno in a sense, this argument applies to him too. Would you rather pick a middle aged white dude with fire balls and a hammer or a militarized angel-possessed doll that shoot stars out of it's arms and uses weaponized versions of the Sun and Aurora Borealis? It just comes down to the fact that protagonists tend to be some of the most boring characters in their games either to serve as a template for normalcy in comparison to the weirder characters or just commercial reasons.
Travis Touchdown is an example of this to me. I understand why you make your protagonist a white guy with dudebro and weeb humor in a market filled with white guys with those comedic tastes, but I find Travis to be one of the most boring choices from No More Heroes (although I understand he's still a good person). I would pick Shinobu Jacobs, Jasper Bratt Jr., or even the new antagonist for NH3, Fu, over him. Shinobu in particular I could see as somewhat feasible, being a recurring character in all the games and likely appearing again in NMH3, but I doubt she would get in unless with specific director influence (like Min Min). An example in FP1 of a boring protagonist would have to be Byleth. I don't like any FE characters, but the protagonists in particular are as boring as watching paint dry.
So can we look forward to more non-main characters? Hopefully. Min Min has already broken that glass ceiling, which will live on in the decision making process for the next Smash games. And before anyone says Spring Man isn't the protagonist...come on man.
- He's the most prominent character on the box art
- He's playable in every demo Nintendo offers for the game
- He has the most promotional art out of any character
- He was the first character ever revealed for ARMS
- He has a freaking evil version of himself. Yeah, you know the ones that all Nintendo protagonists have like Dark Link and Dark Samus? He has a rival in the form of Spring-Tron, an evil robot version of himself, which NO OTHER CHARACTER in ARMS has. And outside of the Nintendo comparison, Spring-Tron is most similar to Metal Sonic. And Sonic is most certainly the protagonist of his franchise (I don't even like Spring Man by the way but I have a point to prove).
So yes, Min Min broke the rule/guideline, and with luck we'll see more examples of this in the future, whether it be in FP2 or Smash 6.