This post is amazing! Thanks for sharing!
I keep it updated as more information comes out (and obs give credit to those who point stuff out), but yeah, AFAIK, no other character in existence not-already in Smash, besides the ARMS rep (for
OBVIOUS reasons) has more evidence than Geno right now. Yeah it's a ton of circumstantial stuff, but it's still a lot in his favor.
The Grich leak should be the king of an example of why you should blindly trust in anything circumstantial, to be honest.
I'm gonna assume you meant "shouldn't", and yeah I get that for sure, but this is a bit of a different circumstance where there's just a lot from multiple different places vs just one source of blurry pics with those obnoxious emoji (and outright mocking Smash as well; that should have been a better indicator of it being fake TBH). I think the problem with the Grinch leak was whatever company was responsible put out a notice or something? The leak itself looked pretty BS, but I believed it more because of the madness that it caused with
actual companies.
While I personally find the "7 more unannounced characters, or however many they claimed it to be." suspicious from the beginning, I can understand why some believed in it, based on... "potential circumstantial evidence".
Idk if anyone else was in my shoes, but outside of wanting to be super optimistic of getting BK and Geno, it was just more or less that actual companies (I can't remember which, but I also think Nintendo was involved?) were looking for who did it and whatnot, despite it being fake in the first place. Sakurai also did say they went a bit trigger-happy way too soon, so it made a lot more sense for the end to be lacking (but man I never expected it to be
that weak); having BK and Geno out of nowhere, alongside Isaac, Shadow, and a few others was obviously too good to be true, and did go against what Sakurai was saying.
Meanwhile, the evidence/leaks in Geno's favor is just for one character, and again, they do come from a wide array of circumstantial and speculative evidence. CacoMallow, Mii Costume Leaker, Nintendo being aware of (and even calling out) both Geno and Waluigi's fan demand, etc. Even if one or two pieces turn out to be false (such as CacoMallow if Caco costume doesn't come, and Mii Costume Leaker if Smith doesn't for example), other ones can still be true. It's not an all-or-nothing like Grinch Leak from a single source.
I want to be optimistic Geno bros, but I have a hard time imagining Geno being a character Nintendo would willing reveal at E3 specifically? Do fans want him? Yes. Would it generate a lot of hype? Yes. Does Nintendo see Geno as worth it at that time.... I am not sure.
If a dead character like BK can be an E3 reveal, I don't see why Geno couldn't, especially after they were extremely surprised that BK had such an insanely positive reception.
Unless they have a bigger-and-still-relevant character that is also heavily fan-demanded coming in FP2, I don't see anyone else that would fit. If someone like Sora or MC are actually coming, then yeah they'd probably take this spot. That said, Geno can be used to celebrate Mario's 35th, esp if the rumors of all the Mario games coming this year are true. He can be used further to also advertise for the upcoming rumored Paper Mario game, especially in the Sakurai video when he explains the history of the character (something like "Paper Mario is the spiritual successor of SMRPG, speaking of which, there's a new Paper Mario game coming, isn't there?"
*gives his sly smirk to the camera as the (would be)
people in the background chuckle*).