Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Good luck with Work all the best. I adore Tales of Symphonia if Lloyd is on I'm going to to be stolked.
I don't know if Azura would have helped things that much. two of the reasons that people groaned over Corrin's reveal was the FE fates hadn't even released outside of japan at that point (I think it was out in Japan at that time?), and the fact that people dislike how many characters FE has, neither of which Azura would really address or change.
Dixie Kong is too unique to be a Echo. She would be better suoted as a semi-clone or unique fighter instead. Dixie is not a girl Diddy, because most of ger moves are associated with her hair.
well they could give her DK's up-b like they did with Ike to Chrom and just re-tool the animation to fit Dixie's hair but I guess she could work and would likely work better as a semi-clone to Diddy like Luigi to Mario.
As someone who wants Dixie in Smash, I honestly have no qualms with Dixie being an echo...as long as she gets the ken/Chrom treatment and not the Daisy/Richter treatment
Is this another fake edit again? I don't know if that's the real Sabi or not. Source please.
I have a question: what happened to that C&D? Are they just, like... ignoring it?
It's only Sabi that got C&D so she can't say anything publicly about Nintendo leaks anymore. She can probably still say stuff in private circles but not publicly anymore.
Wasn't that just for E3?
Yes and no. She was about to leak Banjo & Kazooie the night before and Nintendo's lawyers stopped her and gave her a C&D before she could take action. Sabi isn't legally able to leak Nintendo content anymore because of this.
"Don't leak our stuff" isn't exactly something that only stands for a single event.
If that's the case, they wouldn't be saying, on their own Twitter, "don't worry I'll find about Smash stuff soon."
It's probably a fake account. There is a lot of fake Sabi and Vergeben accounts that claim to be them.
Nope, they posted about it on their Twitter.
She can leak PlayStation and Xbox stuff but not Nintendo. Anyways, I'm getting off lunch so I have to go back to work.
I'm noting the wording "in regards to Smash, it'll be shared when I can." Which implies that they intend to leak it themselves, or at least pass the information along to others (which I still think is a Bad Idea, given that you're basically saying, publicly, "yeah I'm still leaking stuff I'm not supposed to but I'm getting other people to say it").
I understand you not wanting Heavy, but you don't need to downplay him like that. Other people here have made a better job explaining than I can, but Heavy and TF2 plenty of merit besides just "lol funny memes xd". As a Waluigi fan, this reminds me of how he's usually dismissed by some people as "just a meme pick" despite, again, having more merit than just that. I don't think it's fair to deem certain characters as just memes when they so clearly have more to them outside of internet culture, is all I'm trying to say.
He really isn't though. Just because you don't like the memes doesn't mean he doesn't have a character outside the class you play. (I refer you once again to the very extensive world building valve has done with tf2) If we're being perfectly realistic, he's far more of a character than Gordon Freeman who, in and of himself isn't a character, as his entire character is at best informed by how people act towards him in universe. Same with chell. They're blank slate silent protagonists that the player puts themselves in the role of. Now I want to pause and say I agree that Gordon is ideal to rep valve. This argument seems mostly based on memes and personal bias.
Fatmanonice
The other day I asked Nintendo's reaction to the Sword / Shield backlash, and you said you couldn't say anything yet aside from pointing out things that Nintendo has already publicly done.
Nobody is consistent with their ideals, and there's definitely a non zero amount of people who bought the game to spite people who were criticizing it. (I know this because I've seen people posting about it) and at the end of the day, it's pokemon, you could play as a piece of poop and it will sell like candy coated crack based on it's pedigree alone.
It's just sadly true what they say: die hard Pokemon fans are gonna buy it regardless. The Pokemon Company doesn't have to adhere to any quality and has no standards and the fans will support that.
you also should count children too, if they are fans of pokemon but parents wish to not buy the game, they have to give in defeat to give their kid the newest entry to their favorite series.
That's also a very big factor
Because as we all know, the quality of a work is a set quantifiable value. The idea of something being good to some people and bad to others is just ridiculous. And the loudest on the internet clearly know this quantified value of all items and thus, anyone who purchases a product are just, as you say, fools.
"quality" might not be a quantifiable value in general, but this is a video game that has to live up to the level of quality of other video games, other Nintendo titles, and most importantly, other Pokemon games. The effort put into this product is objectively less than effort put even into Let's Go Pikachu/Eevee, and before release, you would think that lack of quality had turned some hearts against the games, but the sales numbers reveal a lack of true concern for quality products and a lack of concern for whether or not future products aim higher.
Well, I can agree with the last sentence. Whenever people throw a temper tantrum over a video game and then end up buying it anyway, it's definitely suspect and makes me wonder if they were actually that mad about it in the first place or were just ****ting on the game to get some easy internet brownie points.
i was honestly feeling that way with Fire Emblem: Fates.but i tried to see the positives before judging the negatives, i would say that i find the negatives a lot more apparent.
“The effort put into this product is objectively less than Let’s Go” Cite that. No, really, if you’re gonna say something is an objective fact, show me.
ZelDan
. People who spent so much time and energy complaining about how much they hated the games just to turn around and buy them just to hate play it are pretty dumb.
I can only hope they took some of the non petty criticisms to heart. And I really hope TPC gives them more than a year to crank out another pokemon game... But they won't, not as long as it prints money annually
