Killstic
Smash Rookie
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2011
- Messages
- 21
It seems like questions have more of a hidden rhetorical agenda in terms of optimal application for you Overswarm. I.e. Narrowing options for scum and preventing them from escaping through backdoors. I tend to assert pressure on a single read with accusations or points rather than use questions. However I see it's advantage in being a subtle way to lead to accusations and apply a different type of pressure on a given slot.Anything that limits their observable options. Continually lower their observable options and as time goes on you'll be able to say "his plan is really stupid" or "that is the opposite of what he has said".
Also, give them more opportunities to lie. The more often they lie, the more they have to remember and the more likely they will be caught.
I agree with Vanderzant's stance though that I am hard pressed to see effective questioning in recent games. I rarely ask questions aside from ones that I believe would have direct relevance towards forming a read on that slot. I have found though that there are passive benefits such as giving people reasons to be active and to try to draw relationships. I generally don't rely on questions though for direct scumhunting and prefer analysis to analysis i.e. this is my read, what are your thoughts on it?