Ryker, when I get 41 kills and outscore everyone on the opposing team by 4000 points, I'm definitely not getting outplayed by anybody.
I'm never going to accept that the definition of "good play" has changed to "pick the easy weapon." That's bull****. Why should I consider people who don't work as hard, don't have as much skill as me, and don't understand the fundamental strategies of the game as well as me better than me? Why should I consider people who win because of a single easy weapon that takes no effort or skill to use better than me? I'm not. It's not an excuse. It's a reason. I KNOW that those guys only won because of the SO, not because they're better than me. I AM superior to them, and my stats showed it.
Take a good look at these stats kid:
That's me on a regular basis, and I do not use the SO. But if you look at the last picture, even though my entire team stomped the other team in every way, shape, and form, we still lost. And do you know why? Sawed-offs. I was there. Even though we killed them more than they killed us, even though we didn't let them control the power weapons, even though we were better players than them, we lost because we couldn't take circles from them, because we couldn't approach them, because they had SOs. That's it. They weren't better than us, they just picked the easy gun, and I will never accept that good play in this game is defined by how many SOs are being used on the team. Gears has always been and should remain a game where the team with the most skill, the best tactical ability, and that puts forth the most effort wins. I am not going to accept the watered down gameplay that enables worse players than me to beat my team. You're full of ****, Ryker.