I'm just using an emulated Ryu amiibo and a simple mod to tell the game that he's a Kazuya amiibo.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Tbh, even as one of the "LoL people" on the thread, I don't see a LoL rep being CP11. First, it's a western IP, and one that doesn't do that well in Japan compared to the rest of the world, which would be a strange note to end on given past precedent.Ah, that reminds me: If a LoL char ends up being the last DLC, then Terry won't be alone anymore (since SNK is owned by Tencent). So, that makes me a bit more supportive of Ahri as a Smasher. :D
Preach.I don't think you don't get me.
I didn't say K. Rool and Ridley stole slots. Just that, if you consider that Min Min, Isabelle, Pyra and Mythra and other characters are "stealing" slots from classic characters (when they're not, btw), then the same goes for Ridley or K. Rool, no matter how much requested they were or the legacy they have. And I wanted both, to clarify.
If you operate with the logic of "if character 1 gets in, that means a slot less and therefore, less chances, for character 2 to get in" then there are no exceptions. With that logic Ridley is "taking" a slot in the roster as much as Min Min does.
This isn't a old fans vs newer fans thing. You can like both sides of the coin. And a Smash game with only old characters would be just boring, no matter how classic or iconic they are.
And the whole deserving thing is just kinda stupid IMO. Because it's not really an objective thing. What is the criteria behind it? Sales? Popularity? Because if it's the first thing, then Pyra/Mythra or Byleth are more "deserving" of being in Smash than Isaac, and if we talk about popularity Isabelle or Incineroar kinda destroy most of the classic fan requests, if not all of them.
Yeah, I think it’s best to have a mix of both old and new characters. The majority of my personal favorites are older but I have no issues with newer games getting a spot as well. Joker is one of my favorite newcomers to Ultimate and his game was pretty recent.Preach.
The attitude of "new bad, old good" is super dumb, and it's shocking that it's still around as much as it is. Byleth, Min Min, and Pyra/Mythra have just as much of a "right" to be in Smash as the likes of Ridley, K. Rool, and Banjo. A main lord of the most popular entry in a major Nintendo franchise, a fan favorite character from a successful new IP, and a second character for a quickly growing first party franchise. Like, how are those not "worthy" additions? Because they didn't exist before Brawl's release? That was over thirteen years ago. There can now legally be people on this site who weren't even born when Brawl released. "They've been requested since Brawl" isn't the trump card some people think it is.
Having three characters who debuted on the Switch is a good thing, because Nintendo's recent history is still Nintendo's history. And coming from me, someone who wants Nintendo characters old (Muddy, Takamaru), new (Edelgard, Henry Fleming), and evergreen (Waluigi lol), such a divide shouldn't exist.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but is Nintendo even involved with Unite? I always had the idea that it was more of a TPC thing considering that it was announced in a Pokémon Presents and that it's not exclusive to Switch.
- Nintendo is partnered with Tencent, which owns Riot. This partnership so far has resulted in the Switch being sold in China, as well as the development of Pokémon Unite.
- Speaking of, Unite shows that Nintendo is at the very least aware of thepopularity of MOBAs, especially in markets that they're trying to expand to.
There can now legally be people on this site who weren't even born when Brawl released.
They are. TPC might do its own thing, but they still have Nintendo as part of its joint venture, and Nintendo is still the publisher for the Switch version.Correct me if I'm wrong, but is Nintendo even involved with Unite? I always had the idea that it was more of a TPC thing considering that it was announced in a Pokémon Presents and that it's not exclusive to Switch.
It's a bummer because I genuinely feel like some of these characters would make great additions to Smash, but a majority of them would flop hard as the FINAL character.The second Fighter Pass hasn't introduced a character from a new company so far, so I decided to make this.
View attachment 321373
First of all, the whole "stealing slots" came from you. Unless I specifically say "They stole slots" I don't mean exactly that. Blowing it out of context. Summary of what I originally said so I don't have to debate this with you anymore: Older Nintendo characters like Dixie, Waluigi, Isaac, Skull Kid, etc.. are just more deserving in my eyes than these newer not as popular characters. (when new characters are shown off... obviously they have to build popularity from peoples experience playing the game so the love isn't there yet, because they are brand new...that's the gist)I don't think you don't get me.
I didn't say K. Rool and Ridley stole slots. Just that, if you considerar that Min Min, Isabelle, Pyra and Mythra and other characters are "stealing" slots from classic characters (when they're not, btw), then the same goes for Ridley or K. Rool, no matter how much requested they were or the legacy they have. And I wanted both, to clarify.
If you operate with the logic of "if character 1 gets in, that means a slot less and therefore, less chances, for character 2 to get in" then there are no exceptions. With that logic Ridley is "taking" a slot in the roster as much as Min Min does.
This isn't a old fans vs newer fans thing. You can like both sides of the coin. And a Smash game with only old characters would be just boring, no matter how classic or iconic they are.
And the whole deserving thing is just kinda stupid IMO. Because it's not really an objective thing. What is the criteria behind it? Sales? Popularity? Because if it's the first thing, then Pyra/Mythra or Byleth are more "deserving" of being in Smash than Isaac, and if we talk about popularity Isabelle or Incineroar kinda destroy most of the classic fan requests, if not all of them.
Yeah. I wasn't confident in getting a BotW character but after E3, I think it's out of the run.
You already said it but the trailer they had, while cool, was brief and didn't show that much, or at least nothing that could mean something for Smash.
They're not gonna add BotW Link but again even if he has a new arm thingy. We didn't see new character with seemingly big roles. And it's very unlikely we will learn more about the game this year. I doubt it's going to be in the September Direct. Maybe at the Game Awards, but at that point we will be playing with CP11...
SMT V at least feels kinda realizable. The game has been already being developed close to Nintendo due to it's exclusive nature and all the Nintendo marketing behind. And as far as we know DLC fighters take around 6 months. So even if Atlus and Sakurai didn't keep contact that much, I'm pretty sure Atlus already has everything about Nahobino decided when we got the SMT V teaser in August of last year.
Angry Birds was basically already in Smash if you look at Smash 4’s Break the Targets.
The madlad did it…
Yes… it’s all coming together…Angry Birds was basically already in Smash if you look at Smash 4’s Break the Targets.
They seem like perfect candidates for Mii hats. I think that would be pretty cool honestly.Yes… it’s all coming together…
Bro if they get ANY representation I’m popping off
Summary of what I originally said so I don't have to debate this with you anymore: Older Nintendo characters like Dixie, Waluigi, Isaac, Skull Kid, etc.. are just more deserving in my eyes than these newer not as popular characters. Period.
As a general rule, I can’t say I completely disagree with him honestly. I would personally be more hyped for more characters from the SNES or NES era as well as others from the 90’s. Still, I think it is important to represent characters from every era of gaming. There are tons of great characters, both new and old, to choose from that it makes no sense to limit selections to just one or the other.
Gonna feel real sorry for you if this'll be your mentality going forward and there becomes less and less reason to pick those characters, especially business-wise.
Gonna feel real sorry for you if this'll be your mentality going forward and there becomes less and less reason to pick those characters, especially business-wise.
Trust me. I feel sorry for myself somewhat, because even if many people secretly agree with me, this type of statement is a lot harder to say due to the worry of being hated. I don't really care about that part though. Overall, I keep my mentality for Smash intact because it makes the little things like custom rosters I make for the hell of it or modding over whoever I'd rather not be in a juicier experience for my own personal tastes.
Gonna feel real sorry for you if this'll be your mentality going forward and there becomes less and less reason to pick those characters, especially business-wise.
And that's why it's a memeIsn't "Only a Sith deal in absolutes" a absolute tho.
Oh yeah, I know how memetic RotS, General SharkobiAnd that's why it's a meme
Well, that and the fact that everything RotS is inherently memeable by it's nature anyways
Yeah, you make a good point. Inkling and Isabelle are very deserving to be in Smash and I wouldn’t replace them with Geno.Aside from all of this being completely opinionated, "old" and "new" aren't enough to determine whether or not a character is more deserving than another. A character existing for 20 years longer doesn't automatically make them superior.
Case in point, is anyone willing to deny that Inkling and Isabelle have become such notable icons for Nintendo that it'd almost feel odd if they were excluded? Should they be swapped for popular fan requests like Issac or Geno in the next game because both Inkling and Isabelle are less than 20 years old?
There's also this that we can use to debunk that "too many newbies" argument:Aside from all of this being completely opinionated, "old" and "new" aren't enough to determine whether or not a character is more deserving than another. A character existing for 20 years longer doesn't automatically make them superior.
Case in point, is anyone willing to deny that Inkling and Isabelle have become such notable icons for Nintendo that it'd almost feel odd if they were excluded? Should they be swapped for popular fan requests like Issac or Geno in the next game because both Inkling and Isabelle are less than 20 years old?
The real question is would the fans be begging for Inkling as much as they have been for Waluigi ? EVERYONE IS HERE!!! Upon seeing that slogan as well as no prior hints or anything of Splatoon coming to Smash. The one question on everyone's mind would be, "OMG!! Where is Inkling......?" I just don't see it. Sure people can be happy that they are in the game, but if they are a NOTABLE enough character to get everybody screaming WHERE ARE THEY?? WHERE ARE THEY?.. I see that as an issue.Aside from all of this being completely opinionated, "old" and "new" aren't enough to determine whether or not a character is more deserving than another. A character existing for 20 years longer doesn't automatically make them superior.
Case in point, is anyone willing to deny that Inkling and Isabelle have become such notable icons for Nintendo that it'd almost feel odd if they were excluded? Should they be swapped for popular fan requests like Issac or Geno in the next game because both Inkling and Isabelle are less than 20 years old?
That really helps to put things into perspective. One thing I will say is that speculation seems to be heavily favored towards newer characters. I’ve tried to bring up retro characters like Crono, Bill Rizer, and the Battletoads on other sites and I usually either get laughed at or completely ignored. Since we haven’t really had an NES rep as DLC yet, I think Bill or the Battletoads would bring something really interesting to Smash. I think Terry was the only SNES rep so Crono would offer something as well.There's also this that we can use to debunk that "too many newbies" argument:
Old characters (20 years and older):
New characters (less than 20 years):
Not actually all that many "new" characters.
Note: Olimar is technically less than 20 right now, but just barely. Also, the Villager is technically 20. Also, the female Pokemon Trainer did not debut at the same time as the male one, which is why they're in different categories (that, and the fact they one of them is 20+, while the other is less than 20).
Agreed. it's not a bad thing to try out the new characters, even if they aren't as popular.
Gonna feel real sorry for you if this'll be your mentality going forward and there becomes less and less reason to pick those characters, especially business-wise.
Regardless of what the fans want more, we're comparing a Super Mario spinoff regular to the avatars and sole Smash reps of a successful Nintendo franchise that's accumulated nearly 20 M in sales with only two games.The real question is would the fans be begging for Inkling as much as they have been for Waluigi ? EVERYONE IS HERE!!! Upon seeing that slogan as well as no prior hints or anything of Splatoon coming to Smash. The one question on everyone's mind would be, "OMG!! Where is Inkling......?" I just don't see it.
I completely agree for base game. Near perfection. Geno as well as a few more Echo Fighters like Black Shadow, Funky/Dixie Kong, Ms. Pacman, etc, would've got it there for me.Not sure what the discussion is about exactly but I imagine people can get cynical when all three first party newcomers are Switch exclusive and one of them was deliberately picked to be extra recent. Still, as for fan requests, base game Smash 4 combined with base game Ultimate knocked it out of the park between Mega Man, Little Mac, Palutena, Shulk, Ridley, K. Rool, each and every veteran and Inkling and later Banjo-Kazooie. That’s like…the complete Elite 4, its Champion and each revisionist redooie of such a concept. Even the fading Brawl requests have their place as Assists. Trying to rake together what slipped through the net and calling it an untapped molehill of requests is very much stretching it and Geno and Isaac are the ultimate skidmarks in this futile attempt to stop the wagon and drive it back 20 years ago to pick up the spoils of an entitled tantrum-induced diarrhea.
I agree with this as well, but obviously nobody would argue someone like Waluigi is clearly the BIGGER glaring omission is all I'm saying. Spinoffs and stuff really don't matter if they have the fan support. Characters like Geno prove that without question.Regardless of what the fans want more, we're comparing a Super Mario spinoff regular to the avatars and sole Smash reps of a successful Nintendo franchise that's accumulated nearly 20 M in sales with only two games.
Removing Inkling means Splatoon as a whole is absent from the roster, and given how popular the franchise is, yeah, I think people would say it's a glaring omission.
Wait, wasn't Terry exclusive to the Neo Geo during that era?That really helps to put things into perspective. One thing I will say is that speculation seems to be heavily favored towards newer characters. I’ve tried to bring up retro characters like Crono, Bill Rizer, and the Battletoads on other sites and I usually either get laughed at or completely ignored. Since we haven’t really had an NES rep as DLC yet, I think Bill or the Battletoads would bring something really interesting to Smash. I think Terry was the only SNES rep so Crono would offer something as well.
Oh yeah probably. I meant he was from that time period. Poor choice of words on my part. I never really followed Fatal Fury and I was more of a Killer Instinct, Street Fighter and Mortal Kombat fan.Wait, wasn't Terry exclusive to the Neo Geo during that era?
Oh thank god. I thought my getting absolutely bodied by him was just me sucking. Not him being legit broken.So a Kazuya lvl9 CPU just won a game at a local.
Told ya he was a great player, hope to see him in bracket one day.
I can not believe thisSo a Kazuya lvl9 CPU just won a game at a local.
Told ya he was a great player, hope to see him in bracket one day.