Timotee
Smash Journeyman
You can play with me if you really wanna drive down here to play, I supposes.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I'm gonna try and get a stick from you too, but seeing as Moblin and I are both jobless teenagers with stingy parents, I doubt either of us will be the first 5.YOU
TALK TO ME ABOUT A STICK! WE'RE OPEN FOR BIDNESS, AND ARE THE ONLY ONES YOU'LL BE ABLE TO GET A X360 PS2/3 STICK FROM FOR UNDER $250! ALSO, IT'LL PROLLY BE UNDER $100, SINCE YOU'RE ONE OF THE FIRST 5!
GET
AT
ME
On that subject, Russia pulled the same trick against Hitler that stopped Napoleon. Moving a military through Russia is far more taxing than a battle could be. 'Stop for gas' moving a military is extremely costly in every aspect, maintenance, provisions, this is the larger part of warfare. Russia could have continued this strategy long after Moscow fell. Russia's retreat and destroy supplies strategy could not be match by blitzkrieg. Luck's never a factor, the situation had to get to a point where people couldn't deny it any longer. Most people, when involved, do not support an aggression of that nature. Weaponry is one of many war factors. This is standard stuff.EDIT:
Also, studying WW2 has solidified my belief in God. Seriously, why do we always get lucky when someone tries to take over the world? The world had some serious luckback10ks vs Hitler.
EX:
Britain bombs a random small side base of Germany's. In it is a thermonuclear bomb, as well as all the people who have been working on it. Britain doesn't know this at all.
Better than that is the fact that Germany ****ed up on their v2 rockets.
v2+nuke=goodbye whitehouse from across the world
And this was before anything with Russia went down.
Aaaaaaaand they prolly could have taken Moscow if they didn't stop for gas. They took a 2 month break in the campaign to do a side-trek. Despite that, the German military, without food, reinforcements, air control, or proper supplies managed to make it to 6 miles outside Moscow.
The more you know!
Speak for yourself, *****! It's my first birthday since my parents got divorced! I'm gonna be swimming in it!I'm gonna try and get a stick from you too, but seeing as Moblin and I are both jobless teenagers with stingy parents, I doubt either of us will be the first 5.
this guy....know his ****Terms: CC, OP, cd, OC3, TvC, If someone can bring me up to speed and say what these mean it'd be great. What's with pirates and World War 2?
On that subject, Russia pulled the same trick against Hitler that stopped Napoleon. Moving a military through Russia is far more taxing than a battle could be. 'Stop for gas' moving a military is extremely costly in every aspect, maintenance, provisions, this is the larger part of warfare. Russia could have continued this strategy long after Moscow fell. Russia's retreat and destroy supplies strategy could not be match by blitzkrieg. Luck's never a factor, the situation had to get to a point where people couldn't deny it any longer. Most people, when involved, do not support an aggression of that nature. Weaponry is one of many war factors. This is standard stuff.
'Better than that is the fact that Germany ****ed up on their v2 rockets.
v2+nuke=goodbye whitehouse from across the world'
Where are you getting this timing and technology? The US distanced themselves for some time. Bombing the Whitehouse, if it was possible in the mid 40's, would result in a huge retaliation with little damage to our military strength. 'Bad idea in the middle of a war. It's not smart today, that's why it doesn't happen hardly ever. Pearl Harbor was a smart attack by Japan that devastated a huge part of our naval power and they suffered a crippling retaliating for it.
The defeat of the Axis powers was heavily determined by factors that aren't measured in standards of 1940's traditional warfare. Not luck.
D***, I promised myself I wouldn't get political here. I can get really into debate things, but it's not personal, so no one take it the wrong way.
so i want from level 1 to level 9 by beating a level 61 ragna.....from when i joined the room was 30-1. Bringing hakumen to top tierI approve of intellectual history debates/discussions.
Also, OP is overpowered, CC in melee is crouch cancelling, dunno about other games. and cd is...uh...dunno.
-------------------------so i want from level 1 to level 9 by beating a level 61 ragna.....from when i joined the room was 30-1. Bringing hakumen to top tier
Is all good. Just lemme know if you fall into money.I'm gonna try and get a stick from you too, but seeing as Moblin and I are both jobless teenagers with stingy parents, I doubt either of us will be the first 5.
I'm laaaaazy on SWF nowadays, so Imma reply to this once, and then we should totally debate it whenever you go to a gathering that I'm at.Terms: CC, OP, cd, OC3, TvC, If someone can bring me up to speed and say what these mean it'd be great. What's with pirates and World War 2?
On that subject, Russia pulled the same trick against Hitler that stopped Napoleon. Moving a military through Russia is far more taxing than a battle could be. 'Stop for gas' moving a military is extremely costly in every aspect, maintenance, provisions, this is the larger part of warfare. Russia could have continued this strategy long after Moscow fell. Russia's retreat and destroy supplies strategy could not be match by blitzkrieg. Luck's never a factor, the situation had to get to a point where people couldn't deny it any longer. Most people, when involved, do not support an aggression of that nature. Weaponry is one of many war factors. This is standard stuff.
'Better than that is the fact that Germany ****ed up on their v2 rockets.
v2+nuke=goodbye whitehouse from across the world'
Where are you getting this timing and technology? The US distanced themselves for some time. Bombing the Whitehouse, if it was possible in the mid 40's, would result in a huge retaliation with little damage to our military strength. 'Bad idea in the middle of a war. It's not smart today, that's why it doesn't happen hardly ever. Pearl Harbor was a smart attack by Japan that devastated a huge part of our naval power and they suffered a crippling retaliating for it.
The defeat of the Axis powers was heavily determined by factors that aren't measured in standards of 1940's traditional warfare. Not luck.
D***, I promised myself I wouldn't get political here. I can get really into debate things, but it's not personal, so no one take it the wrong way.
Is all good. Just lemme know if you fall into money.I'm gonna try and get a stick from you too, but seeing as Moblin and I are both jobless teenagers with stingy parents, I doubt either of us will be the first 5.
I'm laaaaazy on SWF nowadays, so Imma reply to this once, and then we should totally debate it whenever you go to a gathering that I'm at.Terms: CC, OP, cd, OC3, TvC, If someone can bring me up to speed and say what these mean it'd be great. What's with pirates and World War 2?
On that subject, Russia pulled the same trick against Hitler that stopped Napoleon. Moving a military through Russia is far more taxing than a battle could be. 'Stop for gas' moving a military is extremely costly in every aspect, maintenance, provisions, this is the larger part of warfare. Russia could have continued this strategy long after Moscow fell. Russia's retreat and destroy supplies strategy could not be match by blitzkrieg. Luck's never a factor, the situation had to get to a point where people couldn't deny it any longer. Most people, when involved, do not support an aggression of that nature. Weaponry is one of many war factors. This is standard stuff.
'Better than that is the fact that Germany ****ed up on their v2 rockets.
v2+nuke=goodbye whitehouse from across the world'
Where are you getting this timing and technology? The US distanced themselves for some time. Bombing the Whitehouse, if it was possible in the mid 40's, would result in a huge retaliation with little damage to our military strength. 'Bad idea in the middle of a war. It's not smart today, that's why it doesn't happen hardly ever. Pearl Harbor was a smart attack by Japan that devastated a huge part of our naval power and they suffered a crippling retaliating for it.
The defeat of the Axis powers was heavily determined by factors that aren't measured in standards of 1940's traditional warfare. Not luck.
D***, I promised myself I wouldn't get political here. I can get really into debate things, but it's not personal, so no one take it the wrong way.
so my buddy made me a combo video!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pADe096MK8s
check it out!!
and yes its for brawl.....so its a montage instead of a combo video
I can do Noel combos now, Meno! Instead of just running around like an idiot, trying to do combos.So my Rachel totally ***** JVDC on Saturday.
Discuss.