SpaceFalcon
Smash Lord
Kirby is worse then pichu, but sure. Okay, yeah. Alright. Cool, fine.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Or Sheik is incredibly unpopular because she's "unfun" and "cheap" whereas Falcon is an incredibly popular character because he's "manly" and "cool"?that doesn't make it dumb. this is a factual representation of who wins with who at tourneys. if sheik is lower than falcon, it's because falcons win in tourney more than sheiks.
or, silent spectre, hax, darkrain and scar **** up the results and make falcon seem better than he is
but sheik players gotta step it up
it wouldn't be much different than mango boosting falco and puff's points.... I agree with you though, i just can't think of a better rule. I figure if someone can actually get wins with a character that low that they are way better than the opponent, which means that the tournament probably has a low entree fee/entrant number so the number of points would be minimal.Hmm... I feel like that would corrupt the meaning of the results though? What if a strong player played against someone he knew he was certain to beat in the first round so he decided to go Pichu for fun? That wouldn't say anything about how tournament viable the character is. Maybe you should go with (a) a weighted average based on the proportion that player uses the characters or (b) for the sake of simplicity just pick the character he used in the furthest round of the tournament he advanced to? (If he used 2 characters in the final round give them equal weight. I.e., if their placing earned 4 pts, credit each character with 2 for the rankings)
Just a thought.
Ally picked Falcon for Melee.A lot of Brawl people who pick up Melee go either Puff or Sheik, at least in NC.
And this lady's and kirbykaze's, is why Falcon is so good.I played falcon in melee when the game came out for 7 years lol then brawl came out
that sounds like the main bias hereOr Sheik is incredibly unpopular because she's "unfun" and "cheap" whereas Falcon is an incredibly popular character because he's "manly" and "cool"?
We do have to step it up though, one way or another...
1: Mango (Falco)Mass Maddness 16 http://www.smashboards.com/showthread.php?t=237703 <-- need characters and total entrants
24+13+9 = 46, not 47. I don't think that changes much (if anything) but I thought I'd mention it.Original Post said:Peach (24 top8, 13 top4, 9 top2, 0 win, 47 total)
Indeed.that sounds like the main bias here
this method heavily skews towards more popular characters
Isn't that the whole point of this list? It's to show which characters are placing well in tournaments the most frequently, so if there are more of a certain character then odds are it will place better. This isn't to show who the best character is, so I don't understand why people are complaining about flaws in the list, when there really aren't any flaws at all. People are just trying to broaden the intended scope of the list, which is an error on their part.that sounds like the main bias here
this method heavily skews towards more popular characters
If you make a statement you should generally back it up. If you just state something without any reasons, it just appears to be a response that has no basis besides your personal dislike for the thread. This thread compiles and displays the ranking of characters based solely off of tournament results. It shows how the game evolves as it only takes into account recent tournaments. Furthermore since it is based entirely off of empirical results, there can be no quarreling about rankings or complaints that the creators of the thread are biased.Stop disrespecting people vanitas. And this should not be stickied.
wisdom from the mouth of (postcount) babes.Isn't that the whole point of this list? It's to show which characters are placing well in tournaments the most frequently, so if there are more of a certain character then odds are it will place better. This isn't to show who the best character is, so I don't understand why people are complaining about flaws in the list, when there really aren't any flaws at all. People are just trying to broaden the intended scope of the list, which is an error on their part.
Fixed the post for you.I think Reneblade should stop being so good. He is raising the expectations people have for falcon mains.
Fixed your post again. Stop being so modest. :3*sigh* every time somebody jokes like that ruby, It makes me sad, 'cause I wish people would hop off my nuts, they're suffocating.
Still <3 you though.
With players as good as Reneblade, who's surprised? :3WOW at Falcon somehow outgunning Marth, sheik and peach for the win.
Never thought I'd see the day.