Megamang
Smash Lord
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2015
- Messages
- 1,791
Something Ive been pondering of late; I think Sheik is hurt pretty badly by the 2-stock meta and cant/wont dominate tournaments as long as it remains the norm.
Reasons: Being the first to lose a stock hurts Sheik more than anyone due to her needing rage to kill at reasonable %s. If she falls first then she now needs around 30% more or so, but its now also more difficult to rack that extra damage since the opponent is already past her reliable combo %s. Now when she does take that first stock, the gravy damage shes taken will put her into rage sooner, again causing her combos to break early. All of this makes me think that a Sheik in a hole is in a lot more trouble than most any other character; an uphill battle with her is much steeper. With only 2 lives there isnt as much opportunity to outplay the opponent enough in order to make a comeback, since a comeback with her is made more difficult by the games mechanics.
Just a thought, would love to hear peoples opinions about it, whether theres some thruth there or Im just crazy.
Thank god for the bair nerf, it actually gives her this weakness. As someone else said though, I think lucario has a worse problem with this than shiek, although she certainly suffers as well. He has the same problems (kill power greatly diminished, and if he does take damage he can't combo next stock as effectively) except they are exaggerated because he has rage and aura to worry about.
Really I think its just a characteristic of the game more than shiek. In smash, especially post melee, being down a stock sucks. You are hunting for a kill to even things out; they are simply trying to get damage any way they can. AND they have time on their side, meaning they not only know the above strategy, but you have to eventually come to them unless your character can kill with projectiles. It does feel worse in 2stock simply because you die once and suddenly you are on your last stock.