I'm not saying that the Vector sucks though, but the UZI definitely earns the number three spot. I just don't know why its so underrated.
First off its more accurate then the MP5K so you can say its not powerful, but I find its power to be that of a P90 vector hybrid. And if your basing it off of stats then of course there wrong because I mean look at the ACR lol.
And also all SMG's dominate at close range. I don't know how your getting the long range kills with the vector. I admit it dominates and mid but LONG range? I think that's where the UZI shines is the fact that its one of the few all around good SMG's, and that's why I think its underrated is because its basically a really horrid UMP 45. It shines in close range while doing ok in medium and meh in long.
Also again, the vector is better then the UZI, I'm just saying the UZI is slightly better/tied with the P90 and way better then the MP5K.
Though that's just me.
The UMP does not dominate at close range. Someone find my long post on why the Uzi is the worst SMG.
Also, Leafy you're crazy, MP5k is definitely 2nd best SMG, MAYBE tied for 2nd with Vector, but the thing is complete ****. Never compare it to the crappy Uzi again please.
EDIT: Here is my post on the subject from before.
"The Mini-Uzi has the slowest TTK out of all the SMGs outside of the P90 (which is probably the second-worst SMG), and it also shares the most similar stats to this gun, so I'll just compare these two if thats okay. I don't think I really need to explain why the UMP and MP5k beast all over the Mini-Uzi, but I can address the Vector if you want me to. Basically the MP5k and Vector fill the spray use of the SMG much better than the Mini-Uzi.
Both the P90 and Mini-Uzi are 30-20 guns, and both have the same exact range. The P90 shoots at 925 RPM, while the Mini-Uzi shoots at 950 RPM. The 25 RPM difference is negligible, and in the absolute worst case (max range with no Stopping Power), only adds an extra hundredth of a second (.27 vs .28 respectively). In all other cases, the difference is only in the thousandths, and you really shouldn't be running into the former situation often enough for it to matter anyways. If you do, the more manageable recoil on the P90 still should still give it an easier time at range, but that's not the point of an SMG anyways.
So that brings us to clip size. The P90 holds 50 bullets while the Uzi is stuck at a paltry 32. Having nearly double the size of the clip of the Uzi is what really makes the P90 better, and not just because the P90 doesn't have to reload often, but because it can be used more effectively with perks like Marathon since you have way more ammo at your disposal, unlike the Uzi which basically requires Scav to be effective. Uzi has a better reload time barely, but if you combine the total time to empty plus reload time, P90 is faster by almost half a second for each time you run through a clip.
The P90 also has less recoil, which doesn't matter that much given that these are close-range guns, but will still come in handy. One could argue that the Uzi's recoil leads to "more headshots" being that it's vertical, but you can't really argue for more recoil ever being a better thing. The Uzi dose have a better raise/drop time than the P90, but this is pretty irrelevant as you shouldn't need a secondary often when using an SMG.
Anyways, it's not really that the Mini-Uzi is bad, it's just that all the other SMGs are more useful. You can still absolutely do well with it (just like you can with the F2k), but that doesn't make it a good gun."