Because this role in particular is one that is not just flavour.@Shaya: why the hell are you rolefishing?
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Because this role in particular is one that is not just flavour.@Shaya: why the hell are you rolefishing?
Shaya, Swordgard made it clear that he was inflicted with a posting restriction starting on Day 2.Because this role in particular is one that is not just flavour.
Dastrn was pretty inactive and didn't contribute much towards scumhunting. Vig could have killed him for that reason. It's not unheard of for vigilantes to kill off townies that are going to slow them down. Granted, if this is the case, it was an unlucky move. You mention limiting down possibilities but I don't know what you're limiting them down to. Figuring out which faction killed the cop isn't going to get us anywhere, whether it be vig, mafia, or sk lol.Okay, one person, popping off one person, WITHOUT any POSSIBLY helpful information is indeed shooting blindfolded.
wutBecause this role in particular is one that is not just flavour.
Id prefer to leave the question to adumbrodeous for the moment.
I am extremely interested in why adumbrodeous seemed to know that swordgard could not be Cyan.
Well get uncurious because there are answers that you are digging up that could be more beneficial for mafia to uncover than town. Don't be ********.Oh, and by the by? Keep your identity secret. Trust me on that one. Don't give out your character name, ability, nothing.
Hmm,Yeah, more cards on the table, I know he's not Cyan unless there's repetition in roles.
It seems I did misunderstand the context of the situation...I was under the impression that you were contesting that Dastrn was shot by the Vig...apologies.Shadow: First off, I said you implied it, not that you said it. Next, nice try, but the whole thing I said to you about Chibo had nothing to do with the Vig claiming scenerio. It was just something you kind of threw in there though it didn't need to be.
Omni: (And Shadow to a lesser extent) So a vig kills reflex and suddenly the votes that were cast on him have no meaning anymore? That's just ridiculous.
Bardull: You find me one person that doesn't think you were rolefishing in that post, or making it look like a vig might want to consider claiming right now.
As for the question, when did I ever say that I think a vig shot Dastrn?
Shaya: What an odd time to enter the conversation with something you've actually already commented on before. You know I forgot to show you exactly where I got that info from. Did you find it?
I agree with that last statement completely. I totally disagree that you (or "we", as you say) answer my questions specifically and accurately.are you deliberately skirting the issue scamp? you keep responding to us with more questions when we answer your question specifically and accurately.
if the same vig killed someone who wasn't Reflex and there were no votes on that person we would be left in the same situation.
the only scenario that you want to paint that makes the vig have a purpose is shooting Reflex because the town was nearing that decision. that doesnt take into consideration MANY things that deal with flavor such as when they can shoot, how many times they can shoot, the risk involved at performing a shot at night, etc.
i forgot how all this started. just realize that votes that lead to a lynch > vig killing random person off at night.
Well what you quoted is exactly what I was going to quote for you, so why did you bring up point 5 again?Hmm,
Perhaps Ive come in too early with this, but its probably best I do this before Day 2 is over.
Apology accepted. Implications often get confusing.It seems I did misunderstand the context of the situation...I was under the impression that you were contesting that Dastrn was shot by the Vig...apologies.
I answered your question, however. I share SL's sentiments that Vig should not reveal himself, whether or not he has shot already.
Now, answer me this: despite what me and Omni have presented against Chibo, you don't find Chibo's behavior to be suspicious in the slightest. Why do you feel he isn't suspicious? Why do you feel that he is not independent or scum, based on what has been said thus far?
It sounds more like you looked too deeply into my words for a meaning that was not there,Shadow: First off, I said you implied it, not that you said it.
how so?Next, nice try, but the whole thing I said to you about Chibo had nothing to do with the Vig claiming scenerio. It was just something you kind of threw in there though it didn't need to be.
you're going off on a tangent that was not at all implied nor said.Omni: (And Shadow to a lesser extent) So a vig kills reflex and suddenly the votes that were cast on him have no meaning anymore? That's just ridiculous.
You implied it.As for the question, when did I ever say that I think a vig shot Dastrn?
I had a plan?Apology accepted. Implications often get confusing.
But you said you answered my question. I'm confused because I don't remember asking you a question that that can be an answer for. The only question I want answered is how you planned on figuring out who was protected.
To be exact on my Chibo opinion, I feel there is little chance of him being scum but the possibility of him being an independent is more likely. Overall, though, I don't think he is a threat and I think the town should look elsewhere for the time being.
I'm curious as to your opinion on Omni at the moment.
The whole Chibo thing brought up by you that made no sense to me was a reference to this post...Simply making a declaration without an explanation leavesme a bit curious as to what you were referring.
you're going off on a tangent that was not at all implied nor said.
Why are you skirting about it?
And the "tangent that was not at all implied nor said" refers to this one...Nooooooooooooooo.
not that there isn't anything, but that there wasn't enough.
The vigilante would ahave been shooting blindfolded.
It became even more of an issue when Chibo used his ability.
There wouldn't have been anything gained for town if a vigilante had killed Dastrn.
It is a possibilty, but it would have been an awful idea.
You clear now?@scamp: oh gee what do we have here:
1.) paper trail of people who voted Reflex
2.) paper trail of people who didn't vote Reflex
3.) did reflex flip scum? lets look at the late bandwagoners/most likely scum
4.) did reflex flip town? lets look at the early wagoners/most likely scum
5.) did reflex flip scum? lets see if his partners attempted to defend him before bussing him
the point is that i can go on and on. now lets say vig shoots Relfex at night (with Dastrn also dying)
1.) reflex flips vanilla. is there an sk? is there a vig? why are there two deaths?
2.) reflex flips scum. is there an sk? is there a vig? why are there two deaths?
.... that's it. there's nothing information you can get from a vig kill UNLESS vig hits scum which in Day 1 is extremely rare and highly inprobable. hence why i said it's a gamble.
@Shaya: why the hell are you rolefishing?
I don't understand this question. Can you re-phrase it?@.joel: who do you think is the play based on activity and behavior outside of those 3?
Hmm...I am curious to know two things from this.I would just like to point out a few things but first:
Was cyan or w/e his name was evil in ff6?
Also for flavor, I think we do need to pay attention to flavor, but for this we need to figure this out.
Are the evil characters from ff6 the mafia, or has only good roles been given out and some of these just turn out to be mafia? Example, in FF6, pretend A,B,C,D are good and E is evil. Is there an E in this game which is mafia, or only A,B,C,D and OS just made C be mafia? This would help us figure out who is mafia if we happen to lynch one.
Btw sorry for inactiveness, I am trying to rent a venue for my next tourney so I have been busy yesterday night.
unvote
vote: Swordgard
I will give a proper vote this afternoon, atm I'm at school so I don't have that much time to read.
FOS: Edrees
I need some clarification. When you guys say things are based on "flavor" do you mean based on predisposed and assumed roles and alignments, rather than based on activity, behavior and posting patterns? That seems to be the distinction but I'd like full clarification. I thought it would be good to accuse and look for scum based on both of these accounts, but you guys seem to be heavily against it because Mafia gets information. Is that because Mafia gets information on who are the stronger/better ability using town members so if their roles/characters are figured out Mafia would go for them first? I just want to know your reasoning on why doing things on "flavor" is no good - this is to Scamp and Omni, who seem to be against it based on experience. You should explain why it's not a good idea to the rest of us.Talking about flavor needs to stop immediately.
FoS: .joel
Again, nothing is confirmed until it happens. Making assumptions based off the game and its mechanics has no merit. Overswarm could make the best good guys mafia and some of the not so good guys town. Stop debating it because it gets us absolutely no where and we need to move somewhere.
@Scamp: You gettin' on the Chibo wagon or what?
The reason why we can't rely on the flavor is because...well, look at the flavor. Apparently, X number of Heroes from FF6 are now betraying the rest of the Heroes. Knowing someone's identity does not help Town, because Town can not distinguish a character's alignment based on the flavor alone. This is because there is a possibility that the character in question is one of the "betrayers." So, in other words, every character is a candidate for being scum.I"m not gonna touch on the vigilante business seeing as how that issue is set aside since you guys were going nowhere with that.
I need some clarification. When you guys say things are based on "flavor" do you mean based on predisposed and assumed roles and alignments, rather than based on activity, behavior and posting patterns? That seems to be the distinction but I'd like full clarification. I thought it would be good to accuse and look for scum based on both of these accounts, but you guys seem to be heavily against it because Mafia gets information. Is that because Mafia gets information on who are the stronger/better ability using town members so if their roles/characters are figured out Mafia would go for them first? I just want to know your reasoning on why doing things on "flavor" is no good - this is to Scamp and Omni, who seem to be against it based on experience. You should explain why it's not a good idea to the rest of us.
Notice that those of us newer to the game (Shaya and myself) have been trying to figure out rules, and who is what character, but those who have played the game are wanting to avoid the subject. I Just want to make sure it IS because of experience and not because you guys are secretly mafia and it would be to your disadvantage. It seems to be doing things on flavor could expose mafia as much as it could expose townspeople to the Mafia. You guys are saying that we can't make assumptions on the game's mechanics, but its not like we're gonna lynch someone on that assumption, we are just trying to get closer to the truth by discussing it. So we won't act based on that assumption, but I don't see why it's a bad idea to talk about - apparantly its a bad idea because it helps Mafia, so I'm asking why exactly does it help mafia more than it helps town?
To touch another point, I personally think when Chibo used his snare, that it was good for town. If I was against town, I would be way too scared to just throw my ability out there ON someone who appears to be trying to help town (Omni) I honestly think he was sincerely thinking that Omni was getting too much control and power, and letting one person influence the game too much. I felt that way a little bit too initially, so I can see his concerns. I don't like the idea of one or two people leading all discussion and bandwagoning, it could be very dangerous if they turned out to be Mafia. It doesn't mean I think his actions have helped town but I think the motivation and reasoning he gave was in the interests of town.
Unvote
Vote Reflex
Swordgard - Saw you throw the FoS at me, but no explanation as to why?
this is a HUGE warning that normally isn't given by hosts. more than likely scum will be able to do some really nasty things or get really good advantages by learning who we are. this is naturally true in all mafia games but seems to be even more apparent in this game.Oh, and by the by? Keep your identity secret. Trust me on that one. Don't give out your character name, ability, nothing.
...Not finish this up in time? The deadline is a week from today.
A week isn't enough time?