Is that Rici?
I dunno all those namechanges make me lose track of who the hell you are.
I dunno all those namechanges make me lose track of who the hell you are.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Pity the gays then.
Also, I don't see why we're even arguing in terms of freedom and rights. These things do not exist, they are arbritrary concepts we made up and don't even follow.
If the majority in a community doesn't want gay marriage, then **** it don't allow it, it's only going to cause trouble.
If gays hate the bigotry in America, move to a country where being gay is accepted. They're at least free to do that.
People are going to fight before they get along, so they might as well just isolate their clashing cultures so that this nonsensical tension doesn't occur.
I like it.We should have said the same thing to women when they couldn't vote.
Or get over it - This is supposed to be a free country.The premise is very simple, act upon your problems rather than sitting there and complaining.
Not according to the constitution.In any case, rights are set by those in power. Ultimately, we are all equally worthless until we have something that THE MAN wants.
Contrary to what the media spoonfed you, it's not a mosque that's being built. It's just a large community center that only has one room repeat, ONE BLOODY ROOM, for Muslim prayer.It's a bit dickish to build a mosque there though. I think I would oppose building one on that specific place, but I don't mind the others.
The constitution is there to pull the wool over your eyes.Or get over it - This is supposed to be a free country.
Not according to the constitution.
Just because the government can doesn't mean they should. It's like saying a corrupt official could label me a dangerous terrorist and have me killed - Sure, they have the ability to take away my life technically, but I'm pretty sure I should have the right to live.The government can take away all you constitutional rights in an instant, which pretty much means they aren't rights to begin with.
I still don't get the concept of why anyone is actually entitled to anything.Oh cut the anti-Existentialism crap. The fact that any old crazy could gun down any person he or she pleases any day of the week doesn't mean we're entitled to nothing.
You or I are not entitled to anything,
Nature doesn't take sides, and it doesn't grant favours. So I don't get why we're entitled to anything. Just saying.
Seems you're either for or against extremely powerful government. Honestly hard to tell. So... Anarchist or fascist?The constitution is there to pull the wool over your eyes. The government can take away all you constitutional rights in an instant, which pretty much means they aren't rights to begin with.
Of course many laws are ineffectual and pointless. For example: people try and legislate stupid crap like an arbitrary distance between a mosque and the location of a terrorist attack ten years ago.Laws are necessary to nurture a much larger population, but tbh so many laws are completely ineffectual.
Well, you are not an American. I tend to have these discussions with Americans most of the time, and the culture seems to be embedded with entitlement. "We hold these truths to be self-evident..."I still don't get the concept of why anyone is actually entitled to anything.
Nature doesn't take sides, and it doesn't grant favours. So I don't get why we're entitled to anything. Just saying.
I think a well run totalitarian regime would be the most effective. Really I do.Seems you're either for or against extremely powerful government. Honestly hard to tell. So... Anarchist or fascist?
Of course many laws are ineffectual and pointless. For example: people try and legislate stupid crap like an arbitrary distance between a mosque and the location of a terrorist attack ten years ago.
Revolutions only occur if oppression is highly obvious, which in our countries it isn't.Well, you are not an American. I tend to have these discussions with Americans most of the time, and the culture seems to be embedded with entitlement. "We hold these truths to be self-evident..."
Nature doesn't take sides, but game theory is applicable to animal behavior. That is, survival strategies are dependent upon various conditions. This also applies to the relationship between the government and the governed. You can only push a people so far, after which enduring their present circumstance is not preferrable to death. At that point, revolutions occur.
At that point, leaders are hanged.
It isn't. And in order to prevent an uprising, it is in the state's interest to recognize individual rights and freedoms and all that blahblahblah.Revolutions only occur if oppression is highly obvious, which in our countries it isn't.
American prejudice is lulzy like that. If you're white and like guns, you get away with being a mere "gun nut," and people will defend your gun ownership as your 2nd Amendment right. But if you're a minority and like guns, you're either a gang member or a terrorist.A Muslim friend of mine knows a lot about weapons and was talking to someone about it in class and a few girls overheard. I heard them saying after class "stay away from him, he's probably a terrorist or something"
I don't remember saying that. I do remember saying that some people tend to overemphasize the role of religion as the chief cause of conflict in modern relations between the West and the Middle East. I do acknowledge that their tendency to overemphasize may be, in itself, an issue to be addressed, but I just find that political forces have stronger pull than religion. In this case, I do think that religious affiliations are being used as political tools.El Nino I find it ironic (and funny) that you say religion has had little influence on society (yet medieval historians will tell you that medieval western society was virtually defined by Christianity)
I don't think I said I "support" the social contract. I just acknowledge that it exists. The idea may have come from a religion (which one, may I ask?), but the contract itself is a social construct derived from the behavior of social animals.and particularly little influence on yourself, yet you support the social contract, which came from religion.
"Mere" is not a word I would use for something that is a product of culture. I find no point in belitting something just because it is a product of human activity.I don't see how you can make the sweeping claim that all religions are just mereproducts of their culture, when religions such as Catholicism were in complete conflict with the cultural ideals of the time, leading to the persecution of countless believers.