I DONT LIKE THIS.Making one more post, I think, maybe.
I ****IN TOLD YOU TO CONDENSE IF POSSIBLE.
Why do you need to have 1 more post, maybe? Because you're only tied for the most right now?
FOS: Xiivi
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I DONT LIKE THIS.Making one more post, I think, maybe.
It's okay, Hilt. We understand.I think I'm gonna have to drop, guys :/
Too much is going on right now irl for me to try to keep my mind on the game. Hopefully you'll be able to find a replacement easily enough, I don't know if there was anyone else in line besides Kevin. Sorry again, it's just a bad time and I know I won't be able to keep myself active much at all (even though I'm rarely that active anyways >.>)
Even though you think I played a good game in Grammys, there are a lot of things I still don't understand. Especially knowing when and when not to look into the possibility of posting restrictions/abilities. Something you were quick to address before.------
Vyse:
131 is a really nice. He goes through and pulls out new information when many others weren't willing to. 134/169/215 don't worry me much, even though you were the one to drop the double voter idea and opened up that whole mess. However, I still have a good feeling about you. This also scares me because of how well you played Grammys, where you played a very pro-town game as non-town. I'd really like to see more out of you because of this.
------
^ exhibit aI'm waiting for more people to respond to my suspicions of Kataefi.
Chibo I think this is risky... it may not have been a good post by anyone's standards but by how you describe it you were essentially trying to set yourself up as bait for mafia. I can't see how this would be good when really we don't know much about everyone yet, so if anyone did respond then it would still be cloudy as to whether they took the bait because they were mafia or because... they just did. I think this would have been better on a later day and had you not have revealed your real intentions behind the post, because now everyone will think twice before replying to these types of messages.However the reason for posting was to specifically see who would reply to such a garbage post and sort of use it as a reason to pin suspicion on me. I wanted to give an easy way for mafia to somewhat find an excuse to pin suspicion on me (since mafia would know that I'm not one of them), and the fact that Xiivi seems ready to jump down that path.
The people I asked had no problem with 48 hours and thought it was a good idea. I'm very light about the prods - of course I'm not going to prod you. I understand there are outside factors.first off: 48 hours is dumb, 72 please | I was freaking busy the past few days and everytime I sat down to write up stuff something just had to happen and prevent me from doing it. I'd really rather not have to make random BS "I'm here don't prod me" posts.
next: want to see more of (in order):
Chaco
Chibo
Kataefi
Vyse
last:
If I get a prod for being 10 minutes late after writing all of that I'm asking for a replacement.
PS: read my "first off" point steel/marshy
I'm like this in all mafia games for some reason. I'm never too sure about placing votes.Air:
185: Liked the first part of the post. Last line not so much, you're acting as if when you throw your vote down it's permanent and seem randomly worried about being wrong. Do you expect all of your votes to be perfectly placed?
I kind of ovethinked that.231: Didn't like how you make the assumption that posting restriction = independent. Especially when you played Grammys where you had a posting restriction as mafia and there was a townie with a posting restriction.
I would've felt a lot more comfortable if you had posted your giant reply in one post, rather than make a whole bunch. It's clear that something is up (or until you calm down with the multi-posting), but I don't really think it's worth pushing too much since posting a zillion miles an hour doesn't really seem to fit a mafia role to me. Easy to spot PR's I woulda thought would be more town oriented.
Once again by clean I mean too well contructed.Also this is like Kataefi's second mafia game and his posts kind of seem a little too clean. In Grammy Mafia he was aided by Kevin on what to post the majority of the time and his posts seem similar to the ones he made in that mafia game.
This struck me as scummy because it's like he didn't want to be noticed/questioned or something.SuSa I'm actually a bit annoyed at you because you've drawn unnecessary attention on me and you've acted like we're somehow affiliated, and we're not.
Lynching inactive players is kind of like trying to shoot a practice target with your eyes closed. In Grammy mafia (once again) I put a vote on Skyler for being inactive and he ended up getting lynched and showed up town. So I'm kind of avoiding voting for inactives because you can never be too sure what they are because you don't have any kind of read on them.air, do you really think it's worth lynching Kat than what it is lynching other less active players?
Actually, in this post I made http://www.smashboards.com/showpost.php?p=8668780&postcount=203 I said I had suspicions of all three of them working together near the earlier stages of the game. Just because I have a vote on Kataefi doesn't mean I'm ignoring these two, I just simply find Kataefi more suspicious in my eyes. Is that bad?Also what about SuSa/Xiivi?
You're willing to look past the events surrounding these two players and go for Kat?
I'm not brushing what you say off I just really get bad vibes from you.In air's case I'm in a total lose lose situation because he'll just brush it off anyways and vote for me... as he seems to have done.
How is that playing dirty? I'm using experience from another mafia game to help me in this.@Air - I don't like how you're playing dirty and bringing up grammy's mafia btw.
My posts weren't anywhere near like yours so I don't really see what you're getting at.and you were involved just as much as me last game with your posts so I could very easily use your excuse in voting me as my excuse to vote for you.
I'm 100% confident in my vote at the present moment.I hope you're 100% confident in that vote especially in the face of Xiivi and Susa, who have been attracted a lot more attention in general.
*shakes head*Gonna read now guys but first and foremost is Xiivi a double voter or was that a miscount on my way down to the post box?
Did I say I was going to guess, I figured if it was something commonly known by town they could give it to me now so I could reread with all the information available that we had at the end.*shakes head*
Really, Kevin? REALLY?
Just for the sake of ending discussion on this: We do not know who the double voter is (and we are assuming there is), and we do not want to know who it is or even guess. Guessing will show the mafia who is NOT the double voter, which is going to be a useful role for us, and it'll help them narrow down their choices. In a game of 12, I can assume around 2 - 3 mafia, so they are at an advantage when narrowing things down.
Why are you getting good vibes from Chibo, it looks like you didn't just want to mention only one person.At a quick glance, I'll take more time to read soon (PROMISE!!!!):
I'm really liking CK's play thus far, getting good vibes from him as well as Chibo.
Xiivi not so much. The first few hours of the game, it was as if he was demanding the spotlight.
Before I'm able to read and comment on everything else, about my post 223...
Obviously I must have had a reason for it.
The fact that it's such a dead obvious joke should really say something. Obviously we are not getting role changes, and yes it would be more than easy to ask Steel. The PMs he sent out to everyone were sent about an hour before my reply on the boards, so yes I knew what was going on. So in that case, why would anyone want to say something about it.
What people should have done is ignore it straight up. Does it offer anything to the game? No. Does it somewhat tell my role at all? No. Did multiple people ignore it? Yes, as they just should have imo.
However the reason for posting was to specifically see who would reply to such a garbage post and sort of use it as a reason to pin suspicion on me. I wanted to give an easy way for mafia to somewhat find an excuse to pin suspicion on me (since mafia would know that I'm not one of them), and the fact that Xiivi seems ready to jump down that path.
And if anyone thinks it was an honest slip up by me, you have greatly underestimated me. Also, if I just flat out revealed that I was mafia after that being said, don't you think Steel would have commented on it somehow?
Liking to type doesn't have anything to do with typing multiple paragraphs about being called out on a stupid post. Anyways.Come back incredibly hard? Sorry I like to type lol, I get caught up in it at times. Every action has a reason. Suspicion started to rise from what I said, so I explained why I said it, simple as that.
How exactly have I been role fishing?
Trying to figure out how it works after you should have realized talking about how the role was bad. That's one instance.This is Susa's first game though right? Of course that crossed my mind, it's just that I really don't expect a new player to try and pull off a lie like that. It doesn't flat out clear Susa in my book so to say, it just does at the moment at least and I'm ready to look at other people.
What are the possibilities for the mystery vote on Susa? The only things I've seen people say so far are like invisible vote and double voter. What's an invisible vote, a power where someone can vote and not have their name revealed? That kind of power would seem like it would be ousted somewhat soon. The only data I've seen on a doublevoter (that being on the wiki) is that they either have their vote count twice or they can secret vote and regular vote. It has to be the second option since from the 1st to 2nd vote count the votes on Susa didn't change and the vote count increased.
However during the period CK voted Xiivi. Is there a chance that the double voter can only work that they get a second vote if they are already voting, hence the term double voter?
Mod: Can you shed light on the double voter conundrum thing?
-_- Though I doubt we can get an answer since it's not a confirmed role and it's a closed setup
---
Susa, you still seemed flustered about unvoting yourself and only did it because everyone yelled at you for doing so. Can you please flat out state why you honestly want to vote yourself? It is 100% bad for you to do so. If your town, you want townies to live. If your scum, your supposed to stay alive. wtf
I just finished a differ mafia game in which someone hammered himself, it was the worst
The first part is absolutely terrible. You gave some wishy washy idea on how you think certain roles would play as if thats the only way they play. For the newer players thats a terrible idea because if a scum was talking a lot at this point and they listened to your post then the newer players would assume there is no way they could be scum. Why else would they post a lot.Part 1 -
Good question... Hmmm. It's a little too early to tell, however it's something good to keep in mind when combining with any future reads on him. Let's take it one step at a time and apply what we know in each confrontation to the situation.
Xiivi is either Town, Mafia, or Independant... obvious
If Xiivi was mafia - would he really want this kind of attention so early on in the game? It did garner a vote from CK afterall.
If Xiivi was independant - pretty much the goal of every single independant (minus Jester) is to stay alive right? I can't think of any that aren't like that. In this case, attracting attention to himself would be bad as an independant.
If Xiivi was town - The attraction would be bad if he was a town power role, as they should be preserved. This follows Xiivi's style as he doesn't want to look into the doublevoter scenario anymore so the mafia doesn't pick up on who it is etc. Vanilla townie on the other hand, where it's obviously not good to get that much attention imo, this is the only possible role where he wouldn't receive any direct backlash.
So the most logical outcome is vanilla townie, but it's still too early to tell. Using what we've seen so far from him will go well when we someday discover what role Susa is, and any various tells or reads we get on Xiivi throughout the game.
Part 2 -
I don't see why we can't discuss how the role actually works, as it would be beneficial to the town to find out more about it, since doublevoters are always town aligned right? It's a power we could eventually use to our advantage. The mafia can discuss by themselves all they want for how they think the role works, but the town can only discuss here.
Scum doesn't want to get lynched, but neither does town?Obviously scum doesn't want attention on them, but neither does Town. You don't want to get mislynched just because of the ridiculous ramblings of Susa on the first 20 pages of the thread. Not a scum tell at all imo.
I've never played regular forum mafia with Xiivi before afaik, is he normally like this? I really couldn't imagine him playing like that tbh.
Thanks for giving us a gigantic piece of WIFOM for later, when you can say.update PMs? u mean im not mafia anymore?