Beat!
Smash Master
Indeed.
Indeed.
Indeed.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Yeah, because we all know **** victims like to shout out the fact that they've been sexually assaulted in the past. Not like it's under-reported on top of that, either.I'm not condoning the use of any terminology, as I think it should be judged on a case-by-case basis (hint: if you're around a **** victim and happen to be playing Smash, think of another word).
I'm not offended, but it does make the community look less attractive to the outside eye. And some of those outside people are potential candidates for entering the scene.I just don't get this pretentious, sanctimonious view people are taking against using the word. You're literally only being offended by the word, not its meaning. It seems entirely absurd to me.
If you're worried about not knowing whether the people around you will be offended, you should pretty much not say anything.Yeah, because we all know **** victims like to shout out the fact that they've been sexually assaulted in the past. Not like it's under-reported on top of that, either.
Yea...this thread goes like this, we basically talk about a little bit, say we shouldn't do it...and then don't give a **** and keep doing it.Oh
It's THIS thread again.
If you can draw a causal relationship between an increase in permissiveness toward the use of a particular word (****), and a decrease in seriousness shown toward the thing itself (actual ****), then I will agree with you. In other words, if you can show that gamers throwing around the word "****" can lead directly to said gaming community (or anyone else that absentmindedly uses it to describe something that isn't actually ****) developing indifference of any kind toward **** itself, then this discussion may not be in vain.All the stuff you said
Does there need to be a causal relationship for it to be wrong that the gaming community has a very apparent indifference to **** itself?If you can draw a causal relationship between an increase in permissiveness toward the use of a particular word (****), and a decrease in seriousness shown toward the thing itself (actual ****), then I will agree with you. In other words, if you can show that gamers throwing around the word "****" can lead directly to said gaming community (or anyone else that absentmindedly uses it to describe something that isn't actually ****) developing indifference of any kind toward **** itself, then this discussion may not be in vain.
You're saying that the actual meaning behind **** has been cheapened (which is debatable due to the vagueness of the word "cheap", and we don't know how cheap it's been the past few millenia) but we'll just roll with it. I'm challenging how the use of a particular word in one context has any bearing over the other contexts of the word. A causal relationship between using '****' to describe a match in Smash and literal **** being "cheapened" is what I'm asking for, because I don't think there is one. You say you're worried about the meaning of **** being cheapened, and this is a thread about the casual use of the word doing just that. If you're saying that Smashers (or other gamers) who say '****' loosely contribute to **** devaluation. I want you to show me how this is true.Does there need to be a causal relationship for it to be wrong that the gaming community has a very apparent indifference to **** itself?
That's not even where I was going with my argument. To the contrary, my point was that, despite the claims that the casual use of the word has not cheapened its meaning, the actual meaning of **** has been cheapened. I don't really care about the way it happened. That it happened at all is what I find worrisome.
So... you bring semantics into the debate to dodge my point and try to trap me in my definitions, then you again bring forth a strawman for me to attempt to support. You must have been a debater in high school.You're saying that the actual meaning behind **** has been cheapened (which is debatable due to the vagueness of the word "cheap", and we don't know how cheap it's been the past few millenia) but we'll just roll with it. I'm challenging how the use of a particular word in one context has any bearing over the other contexts of the word. A causal relationship between using '****' to describe a match in Smash and literal **** being "cheapened" is what I'm asking for, because I don't think there is one. You say you're worried about the meaning of **** being cheapened, and this is a thread about the casual use of the word doing just that. If you're saying that Smashers (or other gamers) who say '****' loosely contribute to **** devaluation. I want you to show me how this is true.
Also, I'd suggest you read the whole thread if you haven't.
Surely you can find a middle ground between saying everything and not saying anything.If you're worried about not knowing whether the people around you will be offended, you should pretty much not say anything.
But they are. It's not just the word ****. When HMW says it was "anal, dry, no spit," that does a lot more to draw a direct connection, and it shows a belief that sexual violence is an acceptable metaphor for defeat in a game. I hear examples of this mindset every time I go to tournaments. If you don't, I have a hard time believing that you're really listening for it.Had a long post, and decided against it. Trends in language come and go, and I don't think that the word in and of itself is enough of a problem, because smashers are not neither consciously nor subconsciously making the drect connection between sexual violence and humiliation in a video game. It'd be a different matter if they did.
Why can't we use a sexual metaphor for defeat? What the hell is wrong with using risque metaphors?But they are. It's not just the word ****. When HMW says it was "anal, dry, no spit," that does a lot more to draw a direct connection, and it shows a belief that sexual violence is an acceptable metaphor for defeat in a game. I hear examples of this mindset every time I go to tournaments. If you don't, I have a hard time believing that you're really listening for it.
It's not off-base. The point is about not dropping vocabulary solely because it might offend people. Not about the likelihood of people being offended by it.Kal, you do realize that your argument about the word *****rdly is totally off-base? *****rdly has a different etymology from ******. ****'s meaning is initially derived from the act of sexual violence. People who are offended by the word *****rdly are just ignorant of the word (probably because most people just use the word miserly). Whereas people who are offended by the word **** are frequently much less ignorant of the word's meaning than the people who use it.
So... you bring semantics into the debate to dodge my point and try to trap me in my definitions, then you again bring forth a strawman for me to attempt to support. You must have been a debater in high school.
I'm trying to say that the whole damn argument of whether the casual use word has lead to the impact of its meaning being lost is neither here nor there. The fact is, it has happened; and rather than acknowledge that, you'd have me dragged into an argument that I have explicitly stated I have no desire to engage in.
Lol don't piss him off.If your argument, that our misuse of the word has led to a dampening of the act itself, made any sense to me, I would follow it. But I call bull ****, because, as said earlier, you haven't shown any causal link between people's appreciation of the act itself and people's callous use of the word.
I agree with this. Like I've said, words themselves hold no more meaning than what we attach to them, so being disapproving of the word rather than the meaning does seem to be absurd.On a separate note, while you can personally be against the use of a word, I think you should avoid being judgmental and sanctimonious towards those who do use it. Using the word "****" doesn't make you a misogynist, so the disapproval seems to be at the word itself, and not its meaning. This seems absurd.
When you put it in that manner, I cannot disagree with you. There are instances in which we associate **** directly with the sexual meaning of it, now that I think about it. However, I don't think that by any means that we are endorsing the actual act of **** (outside of this video game). I will say that the use of the word probably gives some people a negative view of us. I dunno. It didn't bother me when I heard it being used at all. And I'm not sure that we should curtail our speech just because someone may be offended.But they are. It's not just the word ****. When HMW says it was "anal, dry, no spit," that does a lot more to draw a direct connection, and it shows a belief that sexual violence is an acceptable metaphor for defeat in a game. I hear examples of this mindset every time I go to tournaments. If you don't, I have a hard time believing that you're really listening for it.
Essentially this. And to add a bit more, I think that insensitivity to this act comes in the form of things far more pressing than what gamers say about it. I think that it can excused (to some degree, anyways, because you have a salient point) because we aren't actually perpetuating the act, or encouraging it, or making like of the actual act itself (since the context we use it in is different).Why can't we use a sexual metaphor for defeat? What the hell is wrong with using risque metaphors?
Nobody anywhere is trivializing actual **** victims in this, we've simply added an alternate definition and context a word or idea can be used in. You can feel free to disagree based on whatever anecdotal "cheapening" you perceive, but I have yet to see any evidence at all that our hearts have been hardened to their plight. If anything I'd say we're likely more sympathetic than the general population, but that's just my own anecdotal experience speaking.
Most people in this community are more than willing to show empathy and hold their tongues to accommodate people with these issues. But keep in mind this is done out of kindness; not you, nor anyone else has any right to not be offended by the words or actions of others.
It is selfish to expect others to censor themselves because you draw a negative connotation to what they may say. Empathy is one of the most visible signs of maturity in children, but understanding that the world does not revolve around your feelings is a sign of maturity as a person.
I apologize if anyone perceives any of that as offensive as it is not intended as such.
**** is not risque. It is cruel, violent, and one of the worst things you could do to a person.Why can't we use a sexual metaphor for defeat? What the hell is wrong with using risque metaphors?
You just trivialized **** in the paragraph above. If you don't think you have, then you're not at all sympathetic.Nobody anywhere is trivializing actual **** victims in this, we've simply added an alternate definition and context a word or idea can be used in. You can feel free to disagree based on whatever anecdotal "cheapening" you perceive, but I have yet to see any evidence at all that our hearts have been hardened to their plight. If anything I'd say we're likely more sympathetic than the general population, but that's just my own anecdotal experience speaking.
This is a strawman, and you know it. My argument isn't based on my feelings. It's based on the feelings of people who are actually offended by reference to sexual violence in general.It is selfish to expect others to censor themselves because you draw a negative connotation to what they may say. Empathy is one of the most visible signs of maturity in children, but understanding that the world does not revolve around your feelings is a sign of maturity as a person.
But we're perpetuating a culture that elevates and normalizes sexual violence. It may not seem like it, but that's because you're used to the culture. And this culture still does a lot to enable it.Essentially this. And to add a bit more, I think that insensitivity to this act comes in the form of things far more pressing than what gamers say about it. I think that it can excused (to some degree, anyways, because you have a salient point) because we aren't actually perpetuating the act, or encouraging it, or making like of the actual act itself (since the context we use it in is different).
I hope that makes sense.
This is arguable.IMO this argument will never be brought up about the word murder/kill/death even though murder is a more serious crime.
Oh there's definitely a difference in the way **** is viewed depending on the sex of the victim, but that's a problem, too. Underreporting of **** by male victims is higher than by female victims because it's regarded as a joke, and men who have been ***** and do report it are often treated with even less respect than women who report ****.I think their may be a distinction between genders
at least on our state funded radio its socially acceptableto talk/joke about males getting ***** in a domination/literal meaning,but if a word was said/joked about against a female it would be perefectly appropriate to the article, never heardany examples otherwise.
Thank you to you, Kal, and every other linguistic and moral genius who's made this point in this thread.The word "*****rdly" offends virtually every English speaking person in the United States. Should I take it out of my vocabulary to avoid offending people? Perhaps. Is it fair to act like a sanctimonious *** because I don't use the word? No, because the line you choose to draw here is totally arbitrary.
Words change meaning. "Imbecile" used to refer to an individual with a moderate to severe type of mental ***********. Now it's more-or-less synonymous with "idiot" (though you're only allowed to say it if you're old or pretentious). I'm not condoning the use of any terminology, as I think it should be judged on a case-by-case basis (hint: if you're around a **** victim and happen to be playing Smash, think of another word). I just don't get this pretentious, sanctimonious view people are taking against using the word. You're literally only being offended by the word, not its meaning. It seems entirely absurd to me.
Sorry Kage, 'crushed' is reserved solely for Crush's combos.Well I disagree to use **** as a word personally so I made a good effort to say "I owned you, or I destroyed you.. or again I crushed you."
Sorry but I'm from 2006 so i get priority =)Sorry Kage, 'crushed' is reserved solely for Crush's combos.