Col. Stauffenberg
Smash Lord
Saaaam, you should come down to SD this weekend and chill. We miss you.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
actually I was talking about Lucario vs. Marth, but w/e.Marth is def. winnable for olimar as long as you abuse when marth has to kill.
Recover from below -> Jump + UpAir -> tether wilh olimar or else you will get *****.
Unless your braindead/don't know what an olimar is idk what else you'd need besides that lol.
@phil:Jin nyoro~n is amazing :3
That would be scary.I'm afraid of what would happen if we let Bear know the Falco boards are rediscussing the lucario MU...
And they say they have the advantage.
lolThe debate is hilarious although I feel a lot of players may be lost no matter what the results, although it could be a good chance to get Mew2king to switch to Lucario.
Edit: Off-topic(lolwut?): Is this avatar cute enough?
Man, you poor Lukes really do need PR... bad. Someone should do something random like making "ban lucario" polls next to the mk onesor recruiting m2k. I'm half serious.
it'll be interesting to see how the probable mk ban will affect luke and the metagame tho
Thank youlol
I think its cute :3
I didn't read the posts that might have said that Lucario goes even with MK, but I will have to agree with you that he does not go even. I will also have to say it is not a 55:45 match, and it is a tad steeper in the bellows of the 60:40 numbers. Recently, I have been ignoring the MU numbers, just for the self conflict of if you think about it a bit, it can cripple your game while playing, even if you might not be aware of it. Having a thought that, you might lose the matchup because it was deemed a number that was not pleasant, will always enable a thought that you are at a disadvantage. For this though, we are just using MU numbers just for statistics and to prove simple facts, so no worries of course =]Lucario doesn't really go even with MK imo. It's only 45-55 if the MK is aerially ********. Most MKs can **** Lucario with Dair camping.
As sad to say, this is somewhat true. It will rise in more Marths, D3's and Oli's, but this is one of the reasons why I am doing it. Living on the EC, i get so tired of seeing the same ****, and with him gone, people will grow some variety in their picks. The d3 MU to me now** is not has hard as people deemed it to be at first, with my own self opinion included. Adomsk once said that D3 is very limited on options, which he is, and people lose the matchup not just because it might be bad for them, but they haven't exploited D3's weaknesses in approaching properly. That goes for against most characters too. i was talking to EaZy last night about him also, and he pointed out this:Banning MK will be removing the final barrier that will unleash Snakes olimars marths and D3 in their hundreds. we'll get swamped.
I had a long say in this last night, So I will just Quote what i said in the thread:imo it's very stage dependent vs. MK.
M2K says that his experiences vs. ksizzle make him believe that we ratio-wise have an advantage on places like FD and Yoshi's, which kind of debunks the "MK can't be CPd by stages" thing.
Overall, I'd have to say it's like 60:40-55:45 on other neutrals, I think we really need to bring YI and Lylat back as neutrals in more areas, they really limit MK more if you have characters that do well there.
I did have a talk with one of my friends about this earlier infact. MK does have bad stages, but it is character dependent. Diddy on FD would be a fast and easy example. The thing about C/P is that there is infact a chance to ban a stage, and to also strike one. MK does have a good advantage on most neutrals, and the one's he can lose to because of it being character dependent can simply be striked.There's way more CP'ing in Melee than you think, especially in the fights with top tiers. If a Marth ran into a really good Sheik, you'd best believe he'd CP Fox on Cornerria.
Marth and Fox both arguably have no bad matchups in Melee. Just even ones. Fox's even matchups being Marth and Falco. Marth's being Fox and Sheik.
Granted Brawl is a different game than Melee, they both still follow the same basic principles. The "no bad matchups" argument can easily be said for other games not related to smash at all as well. Just CP to an even matchup if that's the case and pick a stage that isn't as much in Meta Knight's favor. There's your CP. It's not broken.
I saw you vote lol.whatever comes out of the MK thread, you can be sure it was is and probably always will be one of the most controversial threads in the SWF. In all reason, i hate MK to the fullest and want him to be gone. but i am afraid of the consequences more than wanting him to be gone. I fear D3 and Marth and having MK gone will only make them flourish more. Besides that, for those who read the marvel comics, MK is like the kingpin. If he leaves Mass chaos will erupt and new power struggles will result from the new populations ESPECCIALLY in the EC. + my friends, smash crew, and Biggest competitors are all anti ban and will quit if he leaves.. so i voted no.
Holy **** He Is Back!!!Haven't been here in ages!
So...
SURPRISE!
I sure am! Now with 80% more patriotism!Holy **** He Is Back!!!
Ergthyjhtgrehenrgtmkytjhggtyijhreg
Names make it seem unprofessional, lol. If its a guide, then let the name be the guide =]Hey im justing wondering if anyone has brawl+ and if they actually main Lucario in it? The reason I am asking is that the Lucario+ thread has died and we need discussion.
The link to the thread is: http://www.smashboards.com/showthread.php?t=230273
Also I think we should name our Lucario guide something.